Access Statistics for Antoinette Baujard

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
"Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12
"Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice 0 0 0 53 1 2 16 175
"Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice 0 0 0 25 0 2 10 29
2022 French Presidential Election: Different Voting Methods, Different Outcomes? 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 20
2022 French presidential election: different voting methods, different outcomes? 0 0 1 3 0 2 25 35
A Framed-field experiment on Approval voting and Evaluation voting 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 31
A possible social choice. Democracy and positional judgments 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20
A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 44
A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 24
A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 30
A return to Bentham's felicific calculus: From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 38
A review of Adler's "Measuring social Welfare" 0 0 1 35 0 1 12 62
A review of M. Adler's 'Wellbeing and fair distribution. Beyond costbenefit analysis' 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14
A review of Wulf Gaertner's 'A primer in Social Choice Theory' 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26
A review of “Beyond GDP: Measuring welfare and assessing sustainability", Marc Fleurbaey and Didier Blanchet. Oxford University Press, 2013, xvi+306 pages 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 26
A utility reading for the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 58
Abram Bergson 0 0 0 12 0 1 9 86
Abram Bergson 0 0 1 35 0 0 9 61
An History of Welfare Economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 40
An History of Welfare Economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 37
An History of Welfare Economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 39
An History of Welfare Economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 36
An epistemological reading of the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 43
An inquiry into Sen's concept of positional judgments for a possible democracy 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19
Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 18
Bergson 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23
Beyond the Consent Dilemma in Libertarian Paternalism, a Normative Void 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 25
Bien-être individuel et justice sociale: fondement, caractérisation formelle et analyse normative 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 51
CBA, Sen's capabilities and other economic theories of justice 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 27
CITIZENS. Implication des citoyens dans la décision publique locale 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 11
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 35
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 8 0 1 8 59
Citizen Knowledge & the debate on information in welfare economics in perspective. Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements 0 0 1 7 0 1 13 20
Citizen Knowledge and the Debate on Information in Welfare Economics in Perspective: Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8
Citizen Knowledge and the debate on information in welfare economics in perspective. Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Citizen Participation in Experiments on Voting Rules 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Citizen Participation in Experiments on Voting Rules 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Citizen participation in experiments on voting rules 0 0 1 1 0 2 14 14
Collective interest vs. individual interest in Bentham's Felicific Calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness 0 0 0 11 0 0 10 269
Collective interest vs. individual interest in Bentham's felicific calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 64
Commensurable freedoms in the capability approach 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 23
Commensurable freedoms in the capability approach 0 0 1 52 0 2 12 234
Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-­Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 14 0 1 8 58
Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 15 0 1 8 57
Conceptions of freedom and ranking opportunity sets. A typology 0 0 0 81 0 3 13 413
Conceptions of freedom and ranking opportunity sets. A typology 0 0 0 47 0 0 8 184
Conclusion 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21
Critères éthiques et évaluation des politiques publiques: Liberté, égalité, efficacité ? 0 0 3 3 0 1 8 8
De l'économie du bien-être à la théorie de l'équité 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 495
Do Grades Have Absolute Meaning ? An Experiment on Majority Judgment 0 0 1 1 2 3 7 7
Don't reduce Amartya Sen to a single identity! 0 0 0 84 1 2 15 172
Don't reduce Amartya Sen to a single identity! 0 0 0 37 2 2 10 21
Economie du bien-être, théorie du choix social, théories économiques de la justice: l'histoire de l'économie normative 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 53
Electoral results and voting rules. Evidences from an in situ voting experiment during the 2012 French Presidential Elections 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 22
Entrevue avec Antoinette Baujard, Jean-Sébastine Gharbi, Christophe Salvat 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 28
Equity in transportation: guidelines for stakeholders and practitioners 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24
Ethical criteria and evaluation of public policy: Freedom, equality, efficiency? 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 3
Ethics and Technique in Welfare Economics: How Welfarism Evolves in the Making 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 9
Ethics and technique in welfare economics: How welfarism evolves in the making 0 0 0 20 0 0 8 25
Ethics and technique in welfare economics: How welfarism evolves in the making 0 0 0 17 0 1 13 18
Experimentation and voting theory 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 26
Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 27
Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 13
Framed-field experiments on approval voting in political contexts. Some teachings 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31
From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism: A step back to Bentham’s felicific calculus of its members 0 0 0 89 0 1 17 523
Home in the World: A Memoir 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6
How People Understand Voting Rules 0 0 2 10 1 2 23 54
How People Understand Voting Rules 0 0 13 13 0 1 14 14
How people understand voting rules 0 0 6 6 0 1 8 8
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 54
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 2 2 8 47
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 14
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 1 1 1 22 4 5 18 52
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 16 0 1 9 60
Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 38
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 11
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 67
Individual behavior under evaluative voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ Experiment 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 30
Individual behaviors facing different scales in evaluation voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23
Individual judgments and social choice in Sen's idea of justice and democracy 0 0 0 79 0 2 11 155
Individual judgments and social choice in Sen's idea of justice and democracy 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 43
Introduction: Revisiting the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32
Is Evaluative Voting Empirically Stable under Different Grading Scales? 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 21
Is there a link between Saint-Simonian ability and the capability approach to social justice? 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21
L'estimation des préférences individuelles pour la décision publique. Problèmes, paradoxes, enjeux 0 0 0 48 0 2 12 225
L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l' économie du bien-être ! 0 0 1 134 1 2 15 507
L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l'économie du bien-être ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 61
L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l'économie du bien-être ! 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 44
L'économie, une science normative ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27
La démocratie dans l’expertise économique. Yes, we can! 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13
La participation des citoyens aux expérimentations sur les modes de scrutin 0 0 2 2 0 1 13 13
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 27
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 1 1 15 23
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 4 1 2 9 66
Les modes de scrutin en débat 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 42
Les théories économiques de la justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27
L’invisibilisation du commun Le rôle et les enseignements de la théorie du choix social et de l’économie du bien-être 0 0 2 6 0 0 12 25
Making commons (in-)visible 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 6
Making what's common invisible 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 4
Matthew D. Adler, Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 16
Methodological challenges in Experimental Political Sciences. A review of “Experimental Political Science. Principles and Practices”, Edited by Bernhard Kittel, Wolfgang J. Luhan and Rebecca B. Morton, Palgrave Macmillan, ECPR, 2012, 280+xiv p 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 27
Normative Criteria of Social Choice 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 63
Normes et normativité en économie 0 0 0 7 0 1 6 26
Normes et normativité en économie 0 0 0 3 0 1 9 11
Normes et normativité en économie 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12
Not-so-strategic Voters 0 0 0 30 0 1 10 47
Not-so-strategic voters. Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 9 0 2 12 48
Not-so-strategic voters.Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12
Penser l’aide à la décision publique autrement. Amartya Sen et le débat sur l’information 0 0 0 4 1 1 7 27
Positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 32
Positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 40
Quatre cadres d’analyse pour la normativité et la légitimité dans les prescriptions économiques de politiques publiques 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 19
Quatre modèles pour penser à la normativité des recommandations de politique par les économistes 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 17
Quels cadres d'analyse de la normativité des évaluations économiques de politiques publiques? 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23
Re-evaluating the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 25
Reconciling agency and impartiality: positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 10
Reconciling agency and impartiality: positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice 0 0 2 33 0 1 16 56
Reconstructing preferences in a voting context 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 31
Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 21
Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting 0 0 0 18 0 0 13 47
Revisiting the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 111 0 1 20 255
Revisiting the history of welfare economics 0 1 4 80 0 3 36 204
Revisiting the history of welfare economics 0 0 1 86 1 1 14 81
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 34 0 1 13 44
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 0 0 2 15 57
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 37 0 0 13 74
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 0 1 2 12 42
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 3 0 0 8 34
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 1 1 80 0 2 17 88
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 15
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 27
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 12 0 0 9 61
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 27 0 2 8 26
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 27 1 3 16 69
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 49
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13
Some Annoying Grading Scale Effects under Different Versions of Evaluative Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 23
Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting 0 0 0 16 1 2 19 65
Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting 0 0 0 1 1 1 16 33
Statement on the vote and the election 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 53
Subjective wellbeing and welfare analysis: Problems and solutions for adaptive preferences 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22
The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 31
The birth of the capability approach in the context of the welfarist criticism 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 25
The birth of the capability approach in the context of the welfarist criticism 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 27
The capacity to confuse: rescuing the Saint-Simonian notion of ability from modern capability theories of social justice 0 0 0 34 1 1 19 96
The capacity to confuse: rescuing the Saint-Simonian notion of ability from modern capability theories of social justice 0 0 0 14 0 0 13 42
The internal inconsistency of welfarism 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 30
The sense of the act of voting depends on rules. A teaching from in situ voting experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27
The sense of the act of voting depends on rules. A teaching from in situ voting experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 28
The value of choice: Experimental approaches 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 36
Thinking the help of public decision making differently. Amartya K. Sen and the debate on information 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 12
Thinkinking the help of public decision making differently. Amartya K. Sen and the debate on information 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5
Une critique opérationnelle du welfarisme dans la prise de décision publique 0 0 0 8 0 0 11 104
Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism 0 0 2 125 0 0 13 668
Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 68
Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism 0 0 0 148 0 0 27 445
Utilité et liberté de choix dans les classements d'ensembles d'opportunités 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 32
Value judgment and economics expertise 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 39
Value judgment and economics expertise 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 35
Value judgment and economics expertise 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 64
Value judgments and economics expertise 0 0 1 15 0 0 18 117
Value judgments and economics expertise 0 0 1 21 0 1 13 67
Value judgments and economics expertise 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 36
Value judgments and economics expertise 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 38
Value judgments in economic expertise 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 31
Values in Welfare Economics 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 8
Values in Welfare economics 0 0 2 33 0 1 15 59
Values in Welfare economics 0 0 1 18 1 1 14 41
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 17
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33
Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 24
Vote, pouvoir et modes de scrutin dans les sociétés cotées. L'éclairage des théories mathématiques du vote 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 50
Vote, pouvoir et modes de scrutin dans les sociétés cotées: l'éclairage des théories mathématiques du vote 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 49
Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election 0 1 1 26 0 2 7 51
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 42
Voting Experiments 0 0 3 27 0 0 26 38
Welfare Theory, Public Action and Ethical Values: Revisiting the history of welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 50
Welfare and the consistency of welfarism 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21
Welfare economics 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 129
Welfare economics 1 1 5 100 1 3 28 330
Welfare economics 0 1 1 157 0 1 10 226
Welfarism, an historical perspective 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 29
Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 0 1 1 11 13
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 23 5 6 19 69
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 28 1 2 27 192
Élection présidentielle 2022: Autres modes de scrutin, autres résultats ? 0 0 1 2 1 2 12 15
Total Working Papers 2 6 64 2,407 39 134 1,740 11,576
17 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A return to Bentham's felicific calculus: From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism 0 1 2 20 0 2 16 189
Bernhard Kittel, Wolfgang J. Luhan and Rebecca B. Morton: Experimental political science: principles and practices 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 28
Beyond GDP: Measuring Welfare and Assessing Sustainability, Marc Fleurbaey and Didier Blanchet. Oxford University Press, 2013, xvi+306 pages 0 0 0 20 0 1 5 56
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 4 2 2 15 45
Collective interest versus individual interest in Bentham's felicific calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness 0 0 1 30 1 1 14 383
Ethics and Technique in Welfare Economics: How Welfarism Evolves in the Making 0 0 0 2 0 1 13 20
Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 60
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 1 1 8 0 2 14 68
Is there a link between Saint-Simonian ability and the capability approach to social justice? 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 24
L'estimation des préférences individuelles en vue de la décision publique. Problèmes, paradoxes, enjeux 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 29
L'estimation des préférences individuelles en vue de la décision publique.. Problèmes, paradoxes, enjeux 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 18
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 1 1 2 20 52
Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 3
Sen is not a capability theorist 0 1 1 7 0 1 9 46
Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting 0 0 0 2 0 2 11 21
The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data 0 0 0 11 0 0 8 38
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une expérimentation lors de l'élection présidentielle du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 9 1 3 10 70
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d'Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 62
Wulf Gaertner: A primer in social choice theory 0 0 0 93 0 0 4 241
Total Journal Articles 0 3 6 225 8 20 198 1,453

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Abram Bergson [Abram Burk] (1914–2003) 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 17
Framed Field Experiments on Approval Voting: Lessons from the 2002 and 2007 French Presidential Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 24
Framed-field Experiment on Approval Voting and Evaluation Voting. Some Teachings to Reform the French Presidential Electoral System 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23
Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism 0 0 1 19 0 0 31 100
Welfare economics 0 0 3 33 0 2 20 135
Total Chapters 0 0 4 52 0 2 86 299

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-08-07