Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
20th Symposium on Monetary and Financial Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
A Comment on The Dynamic Macroeconomic Effects of Public Capital |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
A DARE for VaR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment of the Bank Lending Channel and Loan Market Disequilibrium in Poland |
0 |
0 |
2 |
118 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
419 |
A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Systemic Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
156 |
A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Systemic Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
2 |
263 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
638 |
A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Systemic Risk Measures: MES versus CoVaR |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
112 |
Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for both duration and severity with bivariate orthogonal polynomials |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
18 |
Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
45 |
Backtesting Marginal Expected Shortfall and Related Systemic Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
85 |
Backtesting VaR Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
2 |
221 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
620 |
Backtesting VaR Accuracy: A Simple and Powerful Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
Backtesting Value at Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
87 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
118 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test |
1 |
1 |
4 |
165 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
361 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-Based-Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A GMM Duration-based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: From Dynamic Quantile to Dynamic Binary Tests |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
Backtesting Value-at-Risk: From Dynamic Quantile to Dynamic Binary Tests |
0 |
0 |
2 |
258 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
602 |
Backtesting marginal expected shortfalland related systemic risk measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
Backtesting value-at-risk: a GMM duration-based test |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
16 |
Bactesting Var Accuracy: A New Simple Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
Certify reproducibility with confidential data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
CoMargin |
0 |
0 |
1 |
159 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
447 |
CoMargin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Computational Reproducibility in Finance: Evidence from 1,000 Tests |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
Credit Market Disequilibrium in Poland: Can We Find What We Expect? Non-Stationarity and the “Min”Condition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
155 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
479 |
Credit Market Disequilibrium in Poland: Can we find what we expect? Non Stationarity and the Min Condition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
Credit Market Disequilibrium in Poland: Can we find what we expect? Non stationarity and the Short Side Rule |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
Cross-country-heterogeneous and Time-varying Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policies in AEs on Portfolio Inflows to EMEs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
40 |
Currency Crises Early Warning Systems: Why They Should Be Dynamic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
35 |
Currency Crises Early Warning Systems: why they should be Dynamic |
0 |
1 |
3 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
94 |
Currency Crisis Early Warning Systems: Why They should be Dynamic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
92 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
161 |
Currency crises early warning systems: why they should be dynamic |
0 |
0 |
2 |
323 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
712 |
Do We Need High Frequency Data to Forecast Variances? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
75 |
Do We Need Ultra-High Frequency Data to Forecast Variances? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
35 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
121 |
Does soft information matter for financial analysts' forecasts? A gravity model approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
44 |
Does the firm-analyst relationship matter in explaining analysts' earnings forecast errors? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
93 |
Does the firm-analyst relationship matter in explaining analysts' earnings forecast errors? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
Downgrading in the First Job: Who and Why |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
Economic Development and Energy Intensity: a Panel Data Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
Economic Development and Energy Intensity: a Panel Data Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
Energy Demand Models: A Threshold Panel Specification of the "Kuznets Curve" |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
Energy demand models: a threshold panel specification of the 'Kuznets curve' |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 26 Developing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 26 Developing Countries, 1970-2002 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
Estimates of government net capital stocks for 26 developing countries, 1970-2002 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
215 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
458 |
Explainable Performance |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
22 |
Explainable Performance |
1 |
1 |
12 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
Extreme Financial Cycles |
0 |
0 |
0 |
136 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
215 |
Financial Development and Growth: A Re-Examination using a Panel Granger Causality Test |
0 |
0 |
6 |
641 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1,091 |
Forecasting High-Frequency Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
High-Frequency Risk Measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
232 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
620 |
How did the Japanese Employment System Change?Investigating the Heterogeneity of Downsizing Practices across Firms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
71 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
214 |
How to Estimate Public Capital Productivity? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
74 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
154 |
How to Evaluate an Early Warning System? Towards a Unified Statistical Framework for Assessing Financial Crises Forecasting Methods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
66 |
How to evaluate an Early Warning System ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
429 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
777 |
How to evaluate an early warning system? Towards a united statistical framework for assessing financial crises forecasting methods |
0 |
0 |
1 |
182 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
384 |
Implied Risk Exposures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
Implied Risk Exposures |
0 |
0 |
1 |
179 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
378 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value at Risk (ISIVaR) Models Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value at Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value at Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
199 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value-at-Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value-at-Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
Irregularly Spaced Intraday Value-at-Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
Irregularly Spaces Intraday Value-at-Risk (ISIVaR) Models: Forecasting and Predictive Abilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
Is Public Capital Really Productive? A Methodological Reappraisal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
172 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
341 |
Is public capital really productive? A methodological reappraisal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
La methode d'estimation des moindres carres modifies ou fully modified |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
41 |
3,748 |
La relation firme-analyste explique-t-elle les erreurs de prévision des analystes ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
Loss Functions for LGD Models Comparison |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
79 |
Loss functions for LGD model comparison |
0 |
0 |
2 |
147 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
342 |
Machine Learning and IRB Capital Requirements |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
10 |
Machine Learning and IRB Capital Requirements: Advantages, Risks, and Recommendations |
0 |
0 |
13 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
Machine Learning and IRB Capital Requirements: Advantages, Risks, and Recommendations |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
Machine Learning et nouvelles sources de données pour le scoring de crédit |
0 |
0 |
2 |
51 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
39 |
Machine Learning et nouvelles sources de données pour le scoring de crédit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
42 |
Machine Learning for Credit Scoring: Improving Logistic Regression with Non Linear Decision Tree Effects |
0 |
1 |
4 |
65 |
1 |
5 |
33 |
163 |
Machine Learning or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let's Get the Best of Both Worlds |
1 |
1 |
3 |
130 |
3 |
6 |
13 |
250 |
Machine Learning or Econometrics for Credit Scoring: Let’s Get the Best of Both Worlds |
0 |
0 |
2 |
37 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
106 |
Machine learning et nouvelles sources de données pour le scoring de crédit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Margin Backtesting |
0 |
0 |
1 |
116 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
221 |
Measuring the Driving Forces of Predictive Performance: Application to Credit Scoring |
0 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
15 |
Modelling Financial Crises Mutation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
68 |
Modèles Non Linéaires et Prévisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
131 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
343 |
Modèles internes des banques pour le calcul du capital réglementaire (IRB) et intelligence artificielle |
1 |
3 |
11 |
11 |
15 |
20 |
50 |
50 |
Modèles non linéaires et prévisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
Modèles non linéaires et prévisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
Modèles à Changement de Régimes et Macro-économiques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
Modèles à changement de régimes et macro-économiques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
Multivariate Dynamic Probit Models: An Application to Financial Crises Mutation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
41 |
Multivariate Dynamic Probit Models: An Application to Financial Crises Mutation |
0 |
0 |
3 |
398 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
799 |
Network Effects and Infrastructure Productivity in Developing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
42 |
Network effects and infrastructure productivity in developing countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
208 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
417 |
Network effects of the productivity of infrastructure in developing countries |
0 |
1 |
4 |
937 |
2 |
4 |
14 |
1,858 |
Networks Effects in the Productivity of Infrastructures in Developing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
Non-Standard Errors |
0 |
0 |
1 |
42 |
6 |
12 |
56 |
432 |
Non-Standard Errors |
0 |
1 |
4 |
27 |
4 |
16 |
81 |
143 |
Nonstandard Errors |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
14 |
14 |
Nonstandard errors |
0 |
1 |
11 |
11 |
4 |
11 |
43 |
43 |
Pitfalls in Systemic-Risk Scoring |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
67 |
Pitfalls in systemic-risk scoring |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
Public Spending Efficiency: an Empirical Analysis for Seven Fast Growing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
Reproducibility Certification in Economics Research |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
30 |
Reproducibility Certification in Economics Research |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Reproducibility of Empirical Results: Evidence from 1,000 Tests in Finance |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
Risk Measure Inference |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
38 |
Risk Measure Inference |
0 |
0 |
0 |
181 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
369 |
RunMyCode.org: a novel dissemination and collaboration platform for executing published computational results |
0 |
1 |
2 |
81 |
2 |
6 |
17 |
349 |
Sampling Error and Double Shrinkage Estimation of Minimum Variance Portfolios |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
21 |
Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios |
0 |
0 |
0 |
101 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
304 |
Second Generation Panel Unit Root Tests |
5 |
10 |
30 |
525 |
14 |
26 |
105 |
1,572 |
Statistique et probabilités en économie-gestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
53 |
Statistique et probabilités en économie-gestion (2e édition) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
Systemic Risk Score: A Suggestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
Systemic Risk Score: A Suggestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
57 |
Systemic Risk Score: A Suggestion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
Taux d'actualisation public, distorsions fiscales et croissance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,001 |
Testing Convergence: A Panel Data Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Testing Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Model with Fixed Coefficients |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
Testing Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
Testing Granger Non-Causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
Testing Granger causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
46 |
Testing Granger causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
54 |
Testing Granger causality in Heterogeneous panel data models with fixed coefficients |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
77 |
Testing Interval Forecasts: A New GMM-based Test |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
40 |
Testing Interval Forecasts: a GMM-Based Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels |
2 |
5 |
17 |
1,683 |
7 |
16 |
53 |
4,093 |
Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
222 |
Testing interval forecasts: a GMM-based approach |
1 |
1 |
4 |
219 |
1 |
1 |
42 |
513 |
The Collateral Risk of ETFs |
1 |
1 |
2 |
80 |
5 |
5 |
17 |
291 |
The Counterparty Risk Exposure of ETF Investors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
175 |
The Economics of Computational Reproducibility |
3 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
The Economics of Computational Reproducibility |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
15 |
31 |
The Fairness of Credit Scoring Models |
0 |
1 |
4 |
37 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
46 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
34 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
39 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
45 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
79 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
158 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
68 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: a Panel SmoothTransition Regression Approach |
0 |
1 |
3 |
547 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
1,120 |
The Heterogeneity of Employment Adjustment Accross Japanese Firms. A study Using Panel Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
The Risk Map: A New Tool for Validating Risk Models |
1 |
1 |
8 |
431 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
652 |
The counterparty risk exposure of ETF investors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
The heterogeneity of employment adjustment across Japanese firms. A study using panel data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
103 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
411 |
The productivy Effects of Public Capital in Developing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
Threshold Effects in the Public Capital Productivity: An International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
1 |
2 |
77 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
270 |
Threshold Effects in the Public Capital Productivity: An International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
Threshold Effects in the Public Capital Productivity: An International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
49 |
Threshold Effects in the Public Capital Productivity: an International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
Threshold Effects in the Public Capital Productivity: an International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
39 |
Threshold Effects of the Public Capital Productivity: An International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
2 |
57 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
216 |
Threshold Effects of the Public Capital Productivity: An International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
1 |
3 |
12 |
746 |
3 |
12 |
60 |
1,961 |
Threshold Effects of the Public Capital Productivity: an International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
70 |
Threshold Effects of the Public Capital Productivity: an International Panel Smooth Transition Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
Un MEDAF à plusieurs moments réalisés |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
Un MEDAF à plusieurs moments réalisés |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
157 |
Un MEDAF à plusieurs moments réalisés |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
162 |
Un Test Simple de l'Hypothèse de Non Causalité dans un Modèle de Panel Hétérogène |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
Un Test de Validité de la Value-at-Risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
32 |
Un test de Validité de la Value-at-risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
Un test simple de l'hypothèse de non causalité dans un modèle de panel hétérogène |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
Une Evaluation des Procédures de Backtesting |
0 |
1 |
5 |
178 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
472 |
Une Synthèse des Tests de Cointégration sur Données de Panel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
57 |
Une Synthèse des Tests de Racine Unitaire en sur Données de Panel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
44 |
Une Synthèse des Tests de Racine Unitaire sur Données de Panel |
0 |
0 |
1 |
484 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1,161 |
Une synthèse des tests de co-intégration sur données de panel |
0 |
2 |
5 |
32 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
226 |
Une synthèse des tests de cointégration sur données de panel |
0 |
0 |
1 |
269 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
805 |
Une évaluation des procédures de Backtesting |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
46 |
Une évaluation des procédures de Backtesting: Tout va pour le mieux dans le meilleur des mondes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
Une évaluation des procédures de Backtesting: Tout va pour le mieux dans le meilleur des mondes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
28 |
Une évaluation des procédures de Backtesting: Tout va pour le mieux dans le meilleur des mondes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
What would Nelson and Plosser find had they used panel unit root tests? |
0 |
0 |
3 |
176 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
393 |
What would Nelson and Plosser find had they used panel unit root tests? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
292 |
Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
18 |
210 |
Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
119 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
367 |
Why don't banks lend to Egypt's private sector ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
240 |
Total Working Papers |
18 |
58 |
244 |
13,280 |
107 |
288 |
1,220 |
41,119 |