| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Natural Resource Theory of U.S. Crop Insurance Contract Choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
77 |
| A Recent Trend in Ecological Economic Research: Quantifying the Benefits and Costs of Improving Ecosystem Services |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
88 |
| A Recent Trend in Ecological Economic Research: Quantifying the Benefits and Costs of Improving Ecosystem Services |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
| A test of the gambler’s and hot hand fallacies in farmers’ weather and market predictions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
| Allocating Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Implications of Different Principles |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
72 |
| Alternative Intertemporal Permit Trading Regimes with Stochastic Abatement Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
201 |
| Alternative Intertemporal Permit Trading Regimes with Stochastic Abatement Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
132 |
| Alternative intertemporal permit trading regimes with stochastic abatement costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| An Analysis of Farmers' Insurance Choices and Federal Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
138 |
| Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of the Conservation Reserve Program and its Interaction with Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
47 |
| Assessing Peer Effects and Subsidy Impacts in Technology Adoption: Application to Grazing Management Choices with Farm Survey Data |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
| Bt Corn, Insecticide Use, and Resistance Time Trend in the US |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
26 |
| Cac Versus Incentive-Based Instruments in Agriculture: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
0 |
99 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
413 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: Value and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
182 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: an Offset Program versus Other Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
123 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
1 |
1 |
1 |
32 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
208 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
49 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
151 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
| Carbon: The Next Big Cash Crop? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
| Characterizing and Comprehending Land Use Change in the Loess Hills Region |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Characterizing the Determinants of Seeding Rate Choices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| Consequences of Co-Benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
| Consequences of Co-benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
160 |
| Conservation Payments: Challenges in Design and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
249 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
175 |
| Crop Competitiveness and Future Climate Change in the Northern Great Plains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
83 |
| Crop Insurance Rate Making, Land Quality and Adverse Selection |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
| Crop Yield and Acreage Adaptation to Climate Changes: Empirical Evidence in Recent Decades |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
| Cropland Reflux: Trends In and Locations of Land Use Change in the Dakotas, 2007 to 2012 and 2012 to 2017 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
| Designation of Co-benefits and Its Implication for Policy: Water Quality versus Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
149 |
| Determinants of Motives for Land Use Decisions at the Margins of the Corn Belt |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Does permit trading minimize cost under an average pollution target? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
| Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Alternative Carbon Accounting, with an Application to the Upper Mississippi River Basin, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
285 |
| Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Measures of Cost-Effectiveness, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
249 |
| Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
452 |
| Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Sodsaver on Land Use Change, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
76 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement Versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
331 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
95 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
507 |
| Environmental conservation in agriculture: Land retirement vs. changing practices on working land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Evidence on the Private-Excess Fertilization Hypothesis |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
| Factors influencing CDM locations in China |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
| Farmers’ Crop Insurance Choices in Iowa and Michigan: Survey Summary |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
33 |
| Farmers’ Rankings of the Determinants of Land Use Decisions at the Margins of the Corn Belt |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
127 |
| Farmers’ valuation of changes to crop insurance coverage level – a test of third generation prospect theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
60 |
| Farmland Use Decisions and Grassland Conversion in the Dakotas: 2015 Survey and Analysis |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
| GREEN PAYMENTS AND DUAL POLICY GOALS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
59 |
| Geographic Determinants of Preferences along U.S. Crop Insurance Subsidy Schedule |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
| Grassland Easement Acquisition: Conversion Hazard Rate, Additionality, and Spatial Spillover |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
16 |
| Grassland Easement Acquisition: Conversion Hazard Rate, Additionality, and Spatial Spillover |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
| Grassland Easement Evaluation and Acquisition: an Integrated Framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Grassland Easement Evaluation and Acquisition: an Integrated Framework |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
47 |
| Green Payments and Dual Policy Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
416 |
| Green Payments and Dual Policy Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
| Green payments and dual policy goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
159 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis Versus System-Wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
117 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
596 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis versus System-wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
203 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis versus System-wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
290 |
| Greenhouse gas impacts of ethanol from Iowa corn: Life cycle assessment versus system wide approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| How Beliefs about Climate Change Adapt? An Assessment with a Natural Experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
152 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
371 |
| Implications of WTP-AFP Discrepancy, Premium Subsidy Reduction and Program Changes in U.S. Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
| Land Resilience and Tail Dependence among Crop Yield Distributions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
| Land Retirement Program Design and Empirical Assessments In the Presence of Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
73 |
| Land Use Change and Policy in Iowa's Loess Hills |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
42 |
| Land Use Change and Policy in Iowa’s Loess Hills |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
| Land Use Consequences of Crop Insurance Subsidies |
1 |
1 |
1 |
39 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
118 |
| Land Use Consequences of Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Least Cost Control of Agricultural Nutrient Contributions to the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
90 |
| Least-Cost Tradeable Risk Permit Scheme for Controlling Risk of Introducing Invasive Alien Species by Shipping |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
| Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Native Grassland Conversion: the Roles of Risk Intervention and Switching Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
| Native Grassland Conversion: the Roles of Risk Intervention and Switching Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
39 |
| Nonpoint Source Needs Assessment for Iowa Part II: the Cost of Improving Iowa’s Water Quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Nonpoint Source Needs Assessment for Iowa Part III: Economic and Environmental Outcomes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an Ex Ante Pollution Target |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
126 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an ex ante Pollution Target |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
129 |
| Over-perception about Land Use Changes: Assessing Empirical Evidence and Linkage with Decisions and Motivated Beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
27 |
| Over-perception about Land Use Changes: Assessing Empirical Evidence and Linkage with Decisions and Motivated Beliefs |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
| Past and future weather: Farmers’ perceptions and their roles in land use decisions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
| Perception Biases and Land Use Decisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
35 |
| Perspectives on Addressing Global Climate Change Issues: Case of U.S. And China |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
77 |
| Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
| Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Production and Abatement Distortions under Noisy Green Taxes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Production and Abatement Distortions under Noisy Green Taxes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
| Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
137 |
| Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
| Recent Events and Participation in U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Risk Management Subsidies, Production System Switching Costs, and Native Grassland Conversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
| Role of Ethanol Plants in Dakotas Land Use Change: Incorporating Flexible Trends in the Difference-in-Difference Framework with Remotely-Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
52 |
| Role of Ethanol Plants in Dakotas’ Land Use Change: Analysis Using Remotely Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
61 |
| Role of Ethanol Plants in Dakotas’ Land Use Change: Analysis Using Remotely Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
173 |
| Role of regret in farmers’ land conversion choices: results from a dynamic economic experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
30 |
| Roles of Systemic Risk and Premium Subsidies in Choices Between Area and Individual Insurance Contracts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| Searching for Efficiency: Least Cost Nonpoint Source Pollution Control with Multiple Pollutants, Practices, and Targets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
62 |
| Strategic Grasslands Conversions and Conservation Easement Acquisitions in the Dakotas: Analysis using Remotely Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
44 |
| Subsidies! The Other Incentive-Based Instrument: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
202 |
| Subsidies! The Other Incentive‐Based Instrument: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
| Systemic Risk, Geography and Area Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
61 |
| TEST OR TREAT? UNDERSTANDING DEMAND FOR ANTIBIOTICS IN DAIRYING |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
| Tail Dependence is to be Expected Among Crop Yields |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
57 |
| The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction Across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients As an Implementation Tool |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
247 |
| The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients as an Implementation Tool |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| The Consequences of Cobenefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
| The Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| The Cost of Cleaner Water: Assessing Agricultural Pollution Reduction at the Watershed Scale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
182 |
| The Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Alternative Carbon Accounting, with an Application to the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
123 |
| The Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Alternative Carbon Accounting, with an Application to the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
| The Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Sodsaver on Land-Use Change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| The Effects of Government Payments on Cropland Acreage, CRP Enrollment, and Grassland Conversion in the Dakotas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
52 |
| The Effects of Government Payments on Native Grassland Conversion, the Crp, and Corn Acreage Changes in the Dakotas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
76 |
| The Geography and Psychology of Participation in U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
33 |
| The Provision of Public Goods from Agriculture: Observations from |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
61 |
| Three essays on environmental incentives: dynamics, asymmetric information, and dual policy goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| Time Path and Implementation of Carbon Sequestration (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
174 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
98 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
164 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
31 |
| Transfers and Environmental Co-Benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
263 |
| Transfers and environmental co-benefits of carbon sequestration in agricultural soils: retiring agricultural land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
| Understanding Grazing Intensity Choices on the U.S. Great Plains |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
| Upper Mississippi River Basin Modeling System Part 3: Conservation Practice Scenario Results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
184 |
| Utility-scale Wind and Solar Development in Iowa: Trends, Prospects, and the Land Factor |
0 |
1 |
3 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
41 |
| What Drives Dairy Farmer Antibiotic Treatment Decisions? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions Be Penalized in a Trading Program? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
114 |
| When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions be Penalized in a Trading Program? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
65 |
| Willingness to Pay for Surplus Sugar in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
153 |
| Total Working Papers |
2 |
4 |
18 |
2,407 |
24 |
52 |
207 |
12,214 |
| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Natural Resource Theory of U.S. Crop Insurance Contract Choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
64 |
| Alternative intertemporal permit trading regimes with stochastic abatement costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
49 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
162 |
| America's Dairy Industry Facing Difficulties from Long-Running Structural Changes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Assessing Cost-effectiveness of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and Interactions between the CRP and Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
37 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
68 |
| Carbon: The next big cash crop? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
55 |
| Dairy Sector Consolidation, Scale, Automation and Factor Biased Technical Change: Working through “Get Big or Get Out” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
| Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
51 |
| Determinants of Motives for Land Use Decisions at the Margins of the Corn Belt |
0 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
74 |
| Environmental conservation in agriculture: Land retirement vs. changing practices on working land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
170 |
| Evidence of climate change impacts on crop comparative advantage and land use |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
58 |
| Grassland easement acquisition: Conversion hazard rate, additionality, spatial spillover, and heuristics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
| Grassland easement evaluation and acquisition with uncertain conversion and conservation returns |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
17 |
| Green payments and dual policy goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
85 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
71 |
| Land Resilience and Tail Dependence among Crop Yield Distributions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
43 |
| Land Use Change and Policy in Iowa’s Loess Hills |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Least-cost tradeable risk permit scheme for controlling risk of introducing invasive alien species by shipping |
0 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
47 |
| On the generalized stacking energy, core structure and Peierls stress of the $$\frac{1} {2}\left\langle {110} \right\rangle \left\{ {110} \right\}$$ dislocations in alkali halide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| Over-Perception about Land Use Changes: Assessing Empirical Evidence and Linkage with Decisions and Motivated Beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
15 |
| Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
43 |
| Production and Abatement Distortions under Noisy Green Taxes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
47 |
| Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
73 |
| Rationality of weather predictions and insurance purchases: testing the gambler’s and hot hand fallacies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
31 |
| Recency effects and participation at the extensive and intensive margins in the U.S. Federal Crop Insurance Program |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
86 |
| STRUCTURE AND PHOTOCATALYTIC PROPERTIES OFN-DOPEDTiO2-xFILMS PREPARED BYN-ION IMPLANTATION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Sodbusting, Crop Insurance, and Sunk Conversion Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Systemic risk, relative subsidy rates, and area yield insurance choice |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
9 |
| The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients as an Implementation Tool |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
| The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients as an Implementation Tool |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| The Consequences of Cobenefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
99 |
| The Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
83 |
| The Effects Of Government Payments On Cropland Acreage, Conservation Reserve Program Enrollment, And Grassland Conversion In The Dakotas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
78 |
| The Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Sodsaver on Land-Use Change |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
92 |
| The dynamics of carbon sequestration and alternative carbon accounting, with an application to the upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
107 |
| The impact of production network economies on spatially-contiguous conservation– Theoretical model with evidence from the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
44 |
| WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SURPLUS SUGAR IN THE UNITED STATES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
| When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions Be Penalized in a Trading Program? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
67 |
| Will adoption occur if a practice is win-win for profit and the environment? An application to a rancher's grazing practice choices |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
15 |
| Total Journal Articles |
1 |
3 |
15 |
402 |
19 |
42 |
109 |
2,151 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.