| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Framed-field experiment on Approval voting and Evaluation voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
| A new methodology for the history of economic thought |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| A.K. Sen and J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| A.K. Sen et J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
72 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
191 |
| A.K. Sen et J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
1 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
12 |
| Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
| Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
50 |
| Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
49 |
| Consumption externality and Pigovian taxation: A comparison between Rawls and Bentham |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
| Dis moi ce que tu penses de la propriété intellectuelle, je te dirai qui tu es |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
| Disentangling distributional motives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
97 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
347 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
95 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
| Experimentation and voting theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
| Extending Xu's results to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Extending Xu's results to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Framed-field experiments on approval voting in political contexts. Some teachings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
27 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
39 |
| Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
| Invoking a Cartesian Product Structure on Social States: New Resolutions of Sen's and Gibbard's Impossibility Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
339 |
| La question de l’Autre en économie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
| Le paradoxe libéral-parétien: un second théorème d'impossibilité dû aux effets d'indépendance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Le paradoxe libéral-parétien: un second théorème d'impossibilité dû aux « effets d'indépendance » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| Liberalism of Freedom Versus Liberalism of Happiness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
| Libéralisme de la liberté versus libéralisme du bonheur - Le cas du paradoxe libéral-parétien |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| Measuring Success: Women Leaders in Industry in Nineteenth Century France: The Case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
| Par-delà le transcendantal et le comparatif. Deux arguments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
| Political philosophy and economics: freedom and labour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
84 |
| Rawls and the economists: the (im)possible dialogue |
0 |
0 |
4 |
142 |
2 |
3 |
15 |
241 |
| Rawls with Hegel: The concept of liberalism freedom |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
| Reconstructing preferences in a voting context |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
| Review of “Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values: Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics” edited by Roger E. Backhouse, Antoinette Baujard and Tamatsu Nishizawa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
26 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
50 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
52 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
45 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
126 |
| The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
| The death of welfare economics: history of a controversy |
0 |
0 |
1 |
57 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
| Transcendental vs. Comparative Approaches to Justice: A Reappraisal of Sen’s Dichotomy |
0 |
0 |
1 |
96 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
253 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
| Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
43 |
| Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
47 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
2 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
164 |
| Women Leaders in Industry in Nineteenth Century France: The Case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
2 |
45 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
86 |
| Women leaders in industry in nineteenth-century France: The case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
3 |
15 |
894 |
12 |
23 |
99 |
3,384 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.