| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Tale of Three Watersheds: Non-point Source Pollution and Conservation Practices Across Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
16 |
| Adoption Subsidies and Environmental Impacts of Alternative Energy Crops |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
3 |
5 |
70 |
250 |
| Agricultural Policy and Conservation Programs in the United States: New Futures, New Benefits |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
42 |
| Agriculture and Water Quality in the Cornbelt: Overview of Issues and Approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
19 |
| Alternative Green Payment Policies under Heterogeneity When Multiple Benefits Matter |
0 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
98 |
| Alternative Green Payment Policies under Heterogeneity When Multiple Benefits Matter |
0 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
54 |
| Analysis of Policy Options for the Control of Agricultural Pollution in California's San Joaquin River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
40 |
| Ask a Hypothetical Question, Get a Valuable Answer? |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
1 |
7 |
32 |
146 |
| Ask a Hypothetical Question, Get a Valuable Answer? |
0 |
0 |
5 |
55 |
1 |
10 |
34 |
479 |
| Assessing the Costs and Environmental Consequences of Agricultural Land Use Changes: A Site-Specific, Policy-Scale Modeling Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
9 |
21 |
179 |
| Assessing the Costs and Environmental Consequences of Agricultural Land Use Changes: A Site-Specific, Policy-Scale Modeling Approach |
0 |
0 |
5 |
30 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
113 |
| Assessment of the Empirical Magnitude of Option Values for Environmental Goods (An) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
| Avoiding biases from data-dependent specification search: an application to a tillage choice model |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
9 |
17 |
17 |
| Bootstrapping in Applied Welfare Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
24 |
| CAC versus Incentive0Based Instruments in Agriculture: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
1 |
2 |
8 |
69 |
3 |
6 |
35 |
243 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: Value and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
2 |
63 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
201 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: Value and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
11 |
31 |
2 |
3 |
30 |
101 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: an Offset Program versus Other Conservation Programs |
0 |
1 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
38 |
38 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
6 |
19 |
3 |
7 |
36 |
94 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
97 |
| Combining Revealed and Stated Preferences: Consistency Tests and Their Interpretations |
5 |
8 |
30 |
102 |
18 |
28 |
109 |
457 |
| Common Property and Public Goods: Discussion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
27 |
27 |
| Confidence Intervals for Elasticities and Flexibilities: Re-evaluating the Ratios of Normals Case |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
15 |
56 |
| Consequences of Co-benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
75 |
| Consequences of Co-benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
4 |
25 |
5 |
7 |
24 |
86 |
| Conservation Payments: Challenges in Design and Implementation |
1 |
1 |
3 |
14 |
6 |
9 |
21 |
88 |
| Conservation Payments: Challenges in Design and Implementation |
1 |
2 |
6 |
18 |
3 |
7 |
19 |
88 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
3 |
5 |
7 |
37 |
7 |
14 |
46 |
170 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
129 |
| Conservation and Welfare Effects of Information in a Time-of-Day Pricing Experiment (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
79 |
| Corner Solution Models of Recreation Demand: A Comparison of Competing Frameworks |
5 |
15 |
40 |
181 |
25 |
68 |
201 |
992 |
| Corner Solution Models of Recreation Demand: A Comparison of Competing Frameworks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
18 |
145 |
| DESIGNING CONSERVATION PROGRAMS TO MITIGATE CLIMATE CHANGE (PowerPoint Presentation) |
1 |
1 |
11 |
11 |
5 |
12 |
61 |
61 |
| Designation of Co-benefits and Its Implication for Policy: Water Quality versus Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, The |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
97 |
| Designation of Co-benefits and Its Implication for Policy: Water Quality versus Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, The |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
7 |
19 |
84 |
| Dynamic Formation of Willingness to Pay: An Empirical Specification and Test, The |
0 |
1 |
8 |
24 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
90 |
| Dynamic Willingness to Pay: An Empirical Specification and Test |
0 |
0 |
1 |
66 |
0 |
4 |
20 |
176 |
| Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
1 |
35 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
127 |
| Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
3 |
5 |
15 |
206 |
| Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
3 |
3 |
10 |
27 |
13 |
19 |
84 |
224 |
| Efficiency of Sequestering Carbon in Agricultural Soils (The) |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
3 |
9 |
32 |
186 |
| Efficiency of Sequestering Carbon in Agricultural Soils, The |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
65 |
| Emission Saved is an Emission Earned: An Empirical Study of Emission Banking (An) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
71 |
| Emission Trading vs. Rigid Regulations in the Control of Vehicle Emissions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
86 |
| Empirical Assessment of Baseline Conservation Tillage Adoption Rates and Soil Carbon Sequestration in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
1 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
14 |
14 |
| Empirical Investigation of the Consistency of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization (An) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
31 |
134 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
1 |
6 |
27 |
68 |
5 |
30 |
111 |
249 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
4 |
32 |
254 |
| Environmental Regulation Under Policy Persistence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
57 |
| Environmental Valuation under Dynamic |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
32 |
| Environmental Valuation under Dynamic Consumer Behavior |
0 |
0 |
6 |
104 |
3 |
9 |
30 |
446 |
| Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
66 |
205 |
| Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand |
1 |
3 |
7 |
30 |
3 |
6 |
22 |
81 |
| Estimation and Welfare Calculations in a Generalized Corner Solution Model with an Application to Recreation Demand |
1 |
3 |
20 |
67 |
12 |
22 |
62 |
355 |
| Evaluating Estimates of Environmental Benefits Based on Multiple Site Recreation Demand Models: A Simulation Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
51 |
| Evaluation of the Gains from Combining Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Data to Value Nonmarket Goods (An) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
24 |
124 |
| From Microlevel Decisions to Landscape Changes: An Assessment of Agricultural Conservation Policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
106 |
| Green Subsidies in Agriculture: Estimating the Adoption Costs of Conservation Tillage from Observed Behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
32 |
188 |
| Green Subsidies in Agriculture: Estimating the Adoption Costs of Conservation Tillage from Observed Behavior |
1 |
6 |
14 |
95 |
4 |
12 |
52 |
352 |
| Green Subsidies in Agriculture: Estimating the Adoption Costs of Conservation Tillage from Observed Behavior (Revised) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
56 |
| Heartland Environmental and Resource Economics Workshop |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
20 |
84 |
| Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
32 |
| Implications of Model Specification for Welfare Estimation in Nested Logit Models (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
47 |
185 |
| Importance of Functional Form in the Estimation of Welfare (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
69 |
| Incentives to Boost Conservation Tillage Adoption |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
49 |
| Institutions and the Value of Nonpoint Source Measurement Technology: Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils |
0 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
68 |
| Institutions and the Value of Nonpoint Source Measurement Technology: Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
99 |
| Introduction to Land Use Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
37 |
124 |
| Iowa Wetlands: Perceptions and Values |
2 |
3 |
7 |
18 |
11 |
17 |
40 |
103 |
| Iowa Wetlands: Perceptions and Values |
0 |
0 |
4 |
47 |
3 |
7 |
22 |
238 |
| Iowa's Wetlands: Who Will Pay for Preservation? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
37 |
| Iowa’s Land and Environment - Serving Competing Needs |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
2 |
6 |
35 |
197 |
| Kuhn-Tucker Estimation of Recreation Demand â A Study of Temporal Stability |
2 |
3 |
13 |
13 |
10 |
16 |
22 |
22 |
| LINKING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCES TO TEST EXTERNAL VALIDITY |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
| Linking Revealed and Stated Preferences to Test External Validity |
1 |
1 |
2 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
19 |
94 |
| Market Integration, Efficiency of Arbitrage, and Imperfect Competition: Methodology and Application to U.S. Celery |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
24 |
65 |
152 |
| Model Performance of Nested Logit Models when Welfare Estimation is the Goal, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
18 |
86 |
| Multiple Benefits of Carbon-Friendly Agricultural Practices: Empirical Assessment of Conservation Tillage |
0 |
0 |
6 |
26 |
21 |
49 |
112 |
222 |
| Multiple Benefits of Carbon-Friendly Agricultural Practices: Empirical Assessment of Conservation Tillage in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
3 |
6 |
28 |
240 |
| New Explanation for the WTP/WTA Disparity (A) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
71 |
| Nonparametric Bounds on Welfare Measures: A New Tool for Nonmarket Valuation |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
40 |
| Nonparametric Bounds on Welfare Measures: A New Tool for Nonmarket Valuation |
1 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
2 |
5 |
19 |
90 |
| Note on the Welfare Effects of Omitting Substitute Prices and Qualities from Travel Cost Models (A) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
37 |
| On the Long-Run Efficiency of Auctioned vs. Free Permits |
1 |
1 |
15 |
39 |
4 |
5 |
29 |
170 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an Ex Ante Pollution Target |
1 |
3 |
6 |
15 |
3 |
6 |
17 |
65 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an Ex Ante Pollution Target |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4 |
4 |
12 |
92 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an ex ante Pollution Target |
0 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
24 |
24 |
| Performance of Nested Logit Models when Welfare Estimation Is the Goal (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
4 |
12 |
38 |
161 |
| Policy Persistence in Environmental Regulation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
154 |
| Policy Persistence in Environmental Regulation |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
59 |
| Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
30 |
| RECREATION DEMAND USING PHYSICAL MEASURES OF WATER QUALITY |
2 |
4 |
8 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
12 |
12 |
| Real Options and the WTP/WTA Disparity |
0 |
0 |
2 |
71 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
300 |
| Real Options and the WTP/WTA Disparity |
0 |
2 |
5 |
17 |
2 |
6 |
15 |
59 |
| Recreation Demand Models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
130 |
| Recreation Demand Models for Environmental Valuation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
54 |
| Recreation Demand Using Physical Measures of Water Quality |
1 |
5 |
10 |
46 |
7 |
20 |
75 |
214 |
| Recreation Demand Using Physical Measures of Water Quality |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
101 |
| Recreational Uses for Iowa's Wetlands |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
134 |
| Reliability of Estimates of Environmental Benefits from Recreation Demand Models (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
156 |
| Revealed Preference Approaches to Environmental Valuation, Volumes I and II |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
37 |
134 |
| Searching for Efficiency: Least Cost Nonpoint Source Pollution Control with Multiple Pollutants, Practices, and Targets |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
11 |
| Simulation Approach to Comparing Multiple Site Recreation Demand Models Using Chesapeake Bay Survey Data (A) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
65 |
| Sny Magill Watershed Modeling Project: Final Report |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
13 |
50 |
| Sny Magill Watershed Modeling Project: Final Report |
0 |
0 |
2 |
34 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
213 |
| Subsidies! The Other Incentive-Based Instrument: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
1 |
2 |
8 |
26 |
3 |
8 |
28 |
142 |
| Subsidy for Adopting Conservation Tillage: Estimation from Observed Behavior (The) |
0 |
0 |
3 |
52 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
247 |
| TARGETING AND THE ECONOMICS OF CUMULATIVE WATERSHED EFFECTS |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
10 |
| THE SUBSIDY FOR ADOPTING CONSERVATION TILLAGE: ESTIMATION FROM OBSERVED BEHAVIOR |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
20 |
20 |
| Testing the Consistency of Nested Logit Models with Utility Maximization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
5 |
9 |
47 |
251 |
| The Cost of Cleaner Water: Assessing Agricultural Pollution Reduction at the Watershed Scale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
98 |
| The Economic Value of Iowa’s Natural Resources |
0 |
1 |
10 |
48 |
3 |
11 |
52 |
109 |
| The Role of Water Quality Perceptions in Modeling Lake Recreation Demand |
2 |
3 |
14 |
61 |
3 |
5 |
44 |
203 |
| The Status of Women of Environmental Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
43 |
158 |
| Time Path and Implementation of Carbon Sequestration (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
93 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
1 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
135 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
58 |
| Uncoordinated Agricultural and Environmental Policy-Making: An Application to Irrigated Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
28 |
| Uncoordinated Agricultural and Environmental Policy-Making: An Application to Irrigated Agriculture in the West |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
15 |
| Undersatnding American Agriculture: Challenges for the Agricultural Resource Management Survey |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
33 |
53 |
| Upper Mississippi River Basin Modeling System Part 3: Conservation Practice Scenario Results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
25 |
107 |
| Value of Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Measurement Technology: Assessment from a Policy Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
69 |
213 |
| Valuing Environmental Quality Changes when Quality is a Weak Complement to a Set of Goods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
39 |
| Valuing Preservation and Improvements of Water Quality in Clear Lake |
1 |
2 |
6 |
70 |
4 |
15 |
45 |
292 |
| Valuing Preservation and Improvements of Water Quality in Clear Lake |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
55 |
| Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice, New Horizons in Environmental Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
12 |
71 |
323 |
| Valuing Water Quality Improvements Using Revealed Preference Methods When Corner Solutions Are Present |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
30 |
| Valuing Water Quality Improvements Using Revealed Preference Methods when Corner Solutions are Prevalent |
1 |
2 |
7 |
69 |
3 |
5 |
14 |
192 |
| WTP/WTA Disparity: Have We Been Observing Dynamic Values but Interpreting Them as Static? (The) |
0 |
0 |
7 |
100 |
2 |
5 |
31 |
376 |
| WTP/WTA Disparity: Have We Been Observing Dynamic Values but Interpreting Them as Static?, The |
0 |
0 |
5 |
33 |
6 |
13 |
59 |
216 |
| Water Markets and Water Quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
31 |
67 |
| Water Quality: Issues and Alternative Policies for Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
93 |
| Welfare Effects of Omitting Substitute Prices and Qualities from Travel Cost Models: Reply (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
52 |
| Welfare Measures When Agents Can Learn: A Unifying Theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
19 |
19 |
| What are the Consequences of Consequentiality? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
35 |
35 |
| What's the Use? Welfare Estimates from Revealed Preference Models When Weak Complementarity Does Not Hold |
1 |
2 |
3 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
87 |
| What's the Use? Welfare Estimates from Revealed Preference Models when Weak Complementarity Does Not Hold |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
9 |
27 |
337 |
| Willingness to Pay for Clear Lake Cleanup |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
65 |
| Willingness-to-Pay, Compensating Variation, and the Cost of Commitment |
2 |
5 |
19 |
48 |
3 |
10 |
45 |
154 |
| Willingness-to-Pay, Compensating Variation, and the Cost of Commitment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89 |
16 |
22 |
62 |
649 |
| Total Working Papers |
46 |
108 |
475 |
2,849 |
379 |
913 |
3,700 |
18,622 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Swedish Business School at Örebro University.