Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Deterrence, Lawsuits and Litigation Outcomes under Agency Problems and Court Errors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
410 |
Effective Labor Relations Laws and Social Welfare |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
80 |
Exclusionary Vertical Restraints and Antitrust: Experimental Law and Economics Contributions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
238 |
Exclusive Dealing and Market Foreclosure: Further Experimental Results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
82 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
118 |
Financially-Constrained Lawyers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
58 |
Financially-Constrained Lawyers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
Financially-Constrained Lawyers: An Economic Theory of Legal Disputes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
69 |
Incentive Contracts for Teams: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
90 |
Incentive Contracts for Teams: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
42 |
Irreconcilable Differences: Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
104 |
Law and Economics and Tort Litigation Institutions: Theory and Experiments |
0 |
0 |
1 |
47 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
89 |
Naked Exclusion: An Experimental Study of Contracts with Externalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
224 |
Naked Exclusion: An Experimental Study of Contracts with Externalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
278 |
Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
63 |
Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
46 |
Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
40 |
Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
37 |
Playing against an Apparent Opponent: Incentives for Care, Litigation, and Damage Caps under Self-Serving Bias |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
189 |
Playing against an Apparent Opponent: Incentives for Care, Litigation, and Damage Caps under Self-Serving Bias |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
138 |
Shotgun Mechanisms for Common-Value Partnerships: The Unassigned-Offeror Problem |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
129 |
Shotguns and Deadlocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
115 |
Split-Award Tort Reform and Settlement Outcomes: An Experimental Investigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
304 |
Split-Award Tort Reform, Firm's Level of Care and Litigation Outcomes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
345 |
Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
69 |
Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
243 |
Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
165 |
Trigger Happy or Gun Shy? Dissolving Common-Value Partnerships with Texas Shootouts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
525 |
Total Working Papers |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1,032 |
3 |
22 |
53 |
4,288 |