| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| Adoption of Secure Pork Supply Plan Biosecurity by U.S. Swine Producers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
| Analyzing Voting Outcomes in Recent Animal Welfare and GM Food Labeling Ballot Initiatives |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
| Assessing Impact of Packing Plant Utilization on Livestock Prices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
41 |
| Assessment of the economic impacts of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| BEEF SPECIES SYMPOSIUM: Economic considerations related to U.S. beef herd expansion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
| Balancing Beef Processing Efficiency and Resiliency Post-COVID-19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| Beef-Cattle Industry & Market Situation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Building Individual Brands with Place-of-Origin Information: Implications for the Food Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
107 |
| CALENDAR VS. WEEKS TO EXPIRATION LIVESTOCK BASIS FORECASTS: WHICH IS BETTER? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
| Changing Impacts of Beef Demand on Cattle Producers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
34 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
74 |
| Comparing Forecasting Ability of Demand System Using Different Data Sources: the Case of U.S. Meat Demand with Food Safety Recalls |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
| Comparing Heterogeneous Consumption in US and Japanese Meat and Fish Demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
330 |
| Comparing Willingness to Supply and Willingness to Pay for Cattle Traceability: A Novel Assessment of Both Supply and Demand Factors Driving Provision of Production Practice Information in Modern Food Systems |
0 |
0 |
3 |
40 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
279 |
| Consumer Food Safety Perceptions: Do they Differ across Products, Species, and Specific Risks? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
48 |
| Consumer Meat Safety Concerns: Impacts of Beef E. coli O157: H7 Recalls on Meat Consumption |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
119 |
| Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Best-Worst Scenario |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
84 |
| Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: Case of Gestation Crates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
76 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
260 |
| Consumers Valuations and Choice Processes of Food Safety Enhancement Attributes: An International Study of Beef Consumers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
139 |
| Consumers’ Willingness-to-Pay for Retail Branded Beef Products with Bundled Attributes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
74 |
| Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
| Cow-Calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
| Dairy Farmer Preferences for 2012 Farm Bill |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
| Dairy Farmer Willingness to Supply Animal Welfare Related Practices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
| Discrete Choice Modeling of Consumer Preferences for Sustainably Produced Steak and Apples |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
190 |
| EUROPEAN CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR U.S. AND DOMESTIC BEEF: WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR SOURCE VERIFICATION, HORMONE-FREE, AND GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM-FREE BEEF |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
267 |
| Economically Optimal Distiller Grain Inclusion in Beef Feedlot Rations: Recognition of Omitted Factors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
55 |
| Economically Optimal Distiller Grain Inclusion in Beef Feedlot Rations: Recognition of Omitted Factors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
107 |
| Effect of Price Expectations and Market Volatility on Sale Rates at Superior Livestock Video Auctions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
| Effect of government quality grade labels on consumer demand for pork chops in the short and long run |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
| Eliciting Expert Opinion on Components of USDA Market Livestock Information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
| End User Preferences for USDA Market Information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
58 |
| Evaluation of Bovine Respiratory Disease Morbidity in the Feedlot and its Effect on Net Return Distributions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
| Expert Views on Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Implementation of Biosecurity Measures for Mitigating Tier 1 Disease Risks in the U.S. Swine, Beef Cattle, and Dairy Industries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
| Facilitating appropriate compensation of electric energy and reserve through standardized contracts with swing |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
| Factors Affecting 2014 Farm Bill Commodity Program Enrollment for Kansas Farmers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| Fed Cattle Flows: Demonstrative Scenario Examples |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Feedlot Risk Management and Benchmarking Survey Summary |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
| Feedlot operators’ decision making regarding price and animal health risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
| Hedging in Presence of Market Access Risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
114 |
| Heterogeneous Production Efficiency of Specialized Swine Producers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
| How Much Do Starting Values Really Matter? An Empirical Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Traditional Approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
44 |
| Is Climate Change Likely to Affect the Geographic Movement of Cattle Production within the U.S.? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| LIVESTOCK BASIS FORECASTS: HOW BENEFICIAL IS THE INCLUSION OF CURRENT INFORMATION? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
80 |
| Management of Multiple Sources of Risk in Livestock Production |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
| Market Impacts of the 2012 Lean Finely Textured Beef Controversy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
96 |
| Meat Availability and Shortages Overview |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
38 |
| Media Coverage of Animal Handling and Welfare: Influence on Meat Demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
199 |
| Pass-through in the United States Beef Industry: An Update and Expansion |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
| Producer Technology Use and the Value of Autonomy: The Case of rbST |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
| Similarities and Differences of Animal Welfare Perceptions between U.S. Cow-Calf Producers and the Public |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
197 |
| Similarities and Differences of Animal Welfare Perceptions between U.S. Cow-Calf Producers and the Public |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
77 |
| Step One to Understanding the Vote-Buy Gap: A look at county level outcomes in recent ballot initiatives |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
58 |
| Swine producer willingness to pay for Tier 1 disease risk mitigation under ambiguity |
0 |
1 |
2 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
22 |
| The Effects of Contracting on Biosecurity Effort by U.S. Swine Producers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
| The Impacts of Food Safety Incidents on U.S. Beef Trade: A Gravity Model Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| The Role of Consumer Risk Perceptions and Attitudes in Cross Cultural Beef Consumption Changes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
76 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
401 |
| The U.S. Gestation Stall Debate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| The US Gestation Stall Debate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
62 |
| U.S. Consumer Appetite for Climate Claims on Beef Products |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
| U.S. Dairy Farmer Welfare Perceptions and Attitudes: Survey Summary |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
92 |
| U.S. Public Dairy Cattle Welfare Perceptions and Attitudes: Survey Summary |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
48 |
| USDA ERS Meat Price Spread Data Product Review |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
21 |
| Using Expert Knowledge to Understand Biosecurity Adoption Aimed at Reducing Tier 1 Disease Risks in the U.S. Livestock Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Valuation of New Products in the Face of Consumer Income Disparity |
0 |
1 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
120 |
| Webinar: COVID-19's impact on the pork industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
| Webinar: COVID-19's impact on the pork industry (Pt. 2) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
| What do you think? Participant Survey Results: 2004 K-State Risk & Profit Conference |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
33 |
| Who Provides Information Matters: The Role of Source Credibility on US Consumers’ Beef Brand Choices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
| Willingness to Pay for Sustainably Labeled Foods: A Measurement Comparison |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
| “Animal Welfare” Practices along the Food Chain: How Does Negative and Positive Information Affect Consumers? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
117 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
5 |
23 |
1,097 |
4 |
37 |
116 |
4,792 |
| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| ANIMAL WELFARE PERCEPTIONS OF THE U.S. PUBLIC AND COW-CALF PRODUCERS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
| An alternative approach to measuring demand changes in meat markets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
23 |
| An experiment on the vote-buy gap with application to cage-free eggs |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
87 |
| An experimental approach to valuing information |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
52 |
| Animal Identification and Tracing in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
93 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
240 |
| Beef and Pork Marketing Margins and Price Spreads during COVID‐19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
52 |
| Benchmarking US consumption and perceptions of beef and plant‐based proteins |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
| Brand Information Mitigating Negative Shocks on Animal Welfare: Is It More Effective to “Distract” Consumers or Make Them Aware? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
86 |
| CONTEMPORANEOUS AND LAGGED CAUSAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG NEGOTIATED LIVE CATTLE CASH MARKETS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
| COVID-19 Federal Aid and Household Food Expenditures |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
| Cheap Talk Scripts and Online Choice Experiments: "Looking Beyond the Mean" |
1 |
2 |
2 |
46 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
157 |
| Choosing quantities impacts individuals choice, rationality, and willingness to pay estimates |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
| Commodity futures with thinly traded cash markets: The case of live cattle |
0 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
60 |
| Conditional feeder cattle hedge ratios: Cross hedging with fluctuating corn prices |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
| Consulting Activities of Agricultural Economists and Response to University Policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
| Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries |
0 |
1 |
3 |
146 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
509 |
| Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Best-Worst Scenario |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
129 |
| Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Best-Worst Scenario |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
40 |
| Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
311 |
| Consumer Valuation of Alternative Meat Origin Labels |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
80 |
| Consumer Valuations of Beef Steak Food Safety Enhancement in Canada, Japan, Mexico, and the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
126 |
| Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
260 |
| Consumer inferences of food safety and quality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
| Consumer voting and demand behavior regarding swine gestation crates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
221 |
| Cow Welfare in the U.S. Dairy Industry: Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Supply |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
78 |
| Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
| Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
| Cow‐Calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
| DIFFERENTIATING “SUSTAINABLE” FROM “ORGANIC” AND “LOCAL” FOOD CHOICES: DOES INFORMATION ABOUT CERTIFICATION CRITERIA HELP CONSUMERS? |
1 |
4 |
6 |
22 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
65 |
| Dairy Farmer Policy Preferences |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
75 |
| Demand Dashboards: Interactive Tools to Communicate Consumer Behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
| Describing Variation in Formula Base Prices for U.S.-Fed Cattle: A Hedonic Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
| Do Consumers Really Know What Cage-Free Is and What It Entails? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
| Do starting values really matter? Development of a genetic algorithm approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
| Drivers of Resident Support for Animal Care Oriented Ballot Initiatives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
93 |
| Drivers of Resident Support for Animal Care Oriented Ballot Initiatives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| E.coli Recalls and Meat Demand: An Updated Assessment |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
38 |
| Economic Impacts of Zilmax(R) Adoption in Cattle Feeding |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
21 |
| Editor's choice Distinguishing beliefs from preferences in food choice |
0 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
69 |
| Effect of Video Information on Consumers: Milk Production Attributes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
104 |
| Effect of government quality grade labels on consumer demand for pork chops in the short and long run |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
77 |
| European Preferences for Beef Steak Attributes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
245 |
| Evaluation of Educational Offerings Associated with the 2014 Farm Bill |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
| Evolving beef export market access requirements for age and source verification |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
68 |
| Factor Demand Analysis for Ethanol in the U.S. Refinery Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
115 |
| Factors Impacting Food Safety Risk Perceptions |
1 |
1 |
3 |
43 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
168 |
| Fed dairy cattle market reporting: Changing marketing methods, regional variation, and hedonic modeling |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
| Feeder Cattle Basis Risk and Determinants |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| Few Journal Article Organizational Structure Characteristics Affect Article Citation Rate: A Look at Agricultural Economics Articles Using Regression Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
| Food safety recall effects across meat products and regions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
74 |
| Hedonic modeling to facilitate price reporting and fed cattle market transparency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| How Choice Experiment Design Affects Estimated Valuation of Use of Gestation Crates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
76 |
| How Do E. coli. Recalls Impact Cattle and Beef Prices? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
159 |
| How Do Students Allocate Their Time? An Application of Prospect Theory to Trade‐offs between Time Spent to Improve GPA Versus Time Spent on Other Activities |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
79 |
| How Meat Demand Elasticities Vary with Price, Income, and Product Category |
0 |
0 |
8 |
44 |
2 |
4 |
26 |
132 |
| How can reporting on foreign animal diseases affect meat purchases? The case of African swine fever |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
| I Will Give You My Vote but Not My Money: Preferences for Public versus Private Action in Addressing Social Issues |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
19 |
| Impact of Extension Education on Kansas Producers’ 2014 Farm Bill Enrollment Decisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
35 |
| Impact of Mandatory Price Reporting on Hog Market Integration |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
76 |
| Impact of Mandatory Price Reporting on Hog Market Integration |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Impact of weather on cow-calf industry locations and production in the United States |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
17 |
| Impacts of Animal Well‐Being and Welfare Media on Meat Demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
132 |
| Impacts of Changes in Market Fundamentals and Price Momentum on Hedging Live Cattle |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
43 |
| Impacts of Retail and Export Demand on United States Cattle Producers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
63 |
| Improving Cattle Basis Forecasting |
0 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
91 |
| International cattle ID and traceability: Competitive implications for the US |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
262 |
| Is it Good to Have Options? The 2014 Farm Bill Program Decisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
| Management of Multiple Sources of Risk in Livestock Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
| Market impacts of E. Coli vaccination in U.S. Feedlot cattle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
| Market potential of new plant‐based protein alternatives: Insights from four US consumer experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
20 |
| Multivariate forecasting of a commodity portfolio: application to cattle feeding margins and risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
61 |
| No Beef with Increased Media: The Impacts of Fitness Media on Meat Demand |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
7 |
| On mandatory labeling of animal welfare attributes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
118 |
| Price Relationships between Calves and Yearlings: An Updated Structural Change Assessment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
| Price pass‐through in the U.S. beef industry: Implications of feedlot capacity utilization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Producer Decision Making under Uncertainty: Role of Past Experiences and Question Framing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
56 |
| Production Efficiency of Specialized Swine Producers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
115 |
| Production Efficiency of Specialized Swine Producers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
23 |
| Production technology option value: the case of rbST in Michigan |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
| Regional and plant-size impacts of COVID-19 on beef processing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Revealed Demand for Country-of-Origin Labeling of Meat in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
108 |
| Structural Change in Forward Contracting Costs for Kansas Wheat |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
| Swine producer willingness to pay for Tier 1 disease risk mitigation under multifaceted ambiguity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
| The Direct and Indirect Effects of ‘Locally Grown’ on Consumers’ Attitudes towards Agri-Food Products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| The Direct and Indirect Effects of ‘Locally Grown’ on Consumers’ Attitudes towards Agri-Food Products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
| The Impact of Ethanol Production on Spatial Grain Market Relationships |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
| The U.S. gestation stall debate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
51 |
| The market for traceability with applications to U.S. feeder cattle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
21 |
| U.S. Meat Demand: Household Dynamics and Media Information Impacts |
0 |
0 |
1 |
117 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
437 |
| USDA Long-Term Meat Trade Projections: A Comprehensive Evaluation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Understanding U.S. Consumer Demand for Milk Production Attributes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
279 |
| Using Expert Knowledge to Guide Commodity Promotion and Research Program Investments: A U.S. Beef Industry Example |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
| Using Expert Knowledge to Understand Biosecurity Adoption Aimed at Reducing Tier 1 Disease Risks in the U.S. Livestock Industry |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Valuations of ‘Sustainably Produced’ Labels on Beef, Tomato, and Apple Products |
0 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
85 |
| Valuations of ‘Sustainably Produced’ Labels on Beef, Tomato, and Apple Products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Verifying Credence Attributes in Livestock Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
133 |
| Verifying Credence Attributes in Livestock Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| Weather effects on U.S. cow‐calf production: A long‐term panel analysis |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
14 |
| Wholesale pork demand: Understanding primal-level heterogeneity |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
| Willingness-to-Pay for Calf Health Programs and Certification Agents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
| Willingness-to-Pay for Calf Health Programs and Certification Agents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
85 |
| Total Journal Articles |
3 |
18 |
73 |
1,610 |
31 |
108 |
330 |
7,445 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.