| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| Choix de localisation, coûts de transport et asymétries régionales |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
| Credence goods, experts and risk aversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
| Credence goods, experts and risk aversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Credence goods, experts and risk aversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
106 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
332 |
| Credence goods, experts and risk aversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Do broad patents deter research cooperation ? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
150 |
| Do patents deter open access ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Do patents deter open access ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
| Echange d'informations, disparites regionales et croissance: le role des couts de transport |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
340 |
| Effets de voisinage et localisation: la ségrégation urbaine est-elle inéluctable ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
150 |
| Effets de voisinage et localisation: la ségrégation urbaine est-elle inéluctable ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
151 |
| Effets de voisinage et localisation: la ségrégation urbaine est-elle inéluctable ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Effets de voisinage et localisation: la ségrégation urbaine est-elle inéluctable ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
19 |
| Effets de voisinage et localisation: la ségrégation urbaine est-elle inéluctable ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
| Ex ante or Ex post? When the timing of merger assessment is up to the merging firms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
28 |
| Ex ante or Ex post? When the timing of merger assessment is up to the merging firms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
192 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
442 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
14 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
162 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
184 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
1 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
125 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Learning by Litigation:An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
41 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
230 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
59 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
167 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
398 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
33 |
| Nouveaux regards en économie et politique de la concurrence + Introduction |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
99 |
| Nouveaux regards en économie et politique de la concurrence + Introduction |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
85 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
103 |
| On the Impact of Labor Market Matching of Regional Disparities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| On the Impact of Labor Market Matching of Regional Disparities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
| On the effective design of the efficiency defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
165 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
583 |
| On the impact of labor market matching on regional disparities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
| On the impact of labor market matching on regional disparities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
183 |
| On the impact of labor market matching on regional disparities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
70 |
| On the impact of labor market matching on regional disparities (CORE Discussion Paper 2008/46) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
61 |
| Politique d'infrastructure et choix de localisation dans un modele de signal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
361 |
| Politique d’infrastructure et choix de localisation dans un modèle de signal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
60 |
| Substantive Law and Antitrust Liability Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| Why are Technological Spillovers Spatially Bounded ? A Theoretical Approach |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
21 |
| Why are technological spillovers spatially bounded ? A market orientated approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
87 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1,387 |
9 |
14 |
84 |
4,905 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.