Access Statistics for Enriqueta Aragones

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Dynamic Model of Multiparty Competition 0 0 1 32 2 3 10 176
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Understanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 2 2 383 7 9 18 1,688
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Undestanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 0 1 17 1 4 12 108
A Solution to the Envy-Free Selection Problem in Economies with Indivisible Goods 0 0 0 35 4 7 9 392
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 446 4 11 22 4,409
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 18 4 7 15 209
Ambiguity in election games 0 0 1 165 2 2 6 1,127
Approval Voting 0 0 1 2 5 8 11 47
Campaign rhetoric: A model of reputation 0 1 2 93 3 6 15 359
Candidate quality in a Downsian Model with a Continuous Policy Space 0 1 1 51 4 13 20 210
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 19 1 2 13 86
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 36 2 3 12 99
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 38 1 3 11 143
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 77 0 0 8 470
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 200 0 2 11 629
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 21 5 5 12 218
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 0 2 3 10 57
Imperfectly Informed Voters and Strategic Extremism 0 0 0 28 4 7 17 93
Imperfectly informed voters and strategic extremism 0 1 1 40 3 6 16 80
Incumbency (dis)advantage when citizens can propose Abstract:This paper analyses the problem that an incumbent faces during the legislature when deciding how to react to citizen proposals such as the outcome of referenda or popular initiatives. We argue that these proposals constitute a potential source of electoral disadvantage when citizens factor in their evaluation of the incumbent his reaction to these proposals. This is because an incumbent politician may jeopardize his re-election by implementing policies close to his preferred ones but unpopular among the electorate. We characterize conditions under which this potential disadvantage becomes in fact an electoral advantage for the incumbent. We fi nd that the choices of the incumbent during the legislature will be closest to citizens policy proposals when the intensity of electoral competition is neither too soft nor too tough. Finally, we use our results to discuss some implications of the use of mechanisms such as referenda and popular assemblies on electoral competition and on the incumbency advantage phenomenon 0 0 0 8 1 3 10 112
Making Statements and Approval Voting 0 0 0 66 0 1 4 402
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 0 3 4 8 40
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model With a Favored Candidate 0 0 1 121 4 7 15 718
Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate 1 1 1 92 3 4 14 427
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 0 0 0 20 1 1 10 319
Negativity effect and the emergence of ideologies 0 0 0 330 3 6 12 5,677
Negativity effect in multiparty electoral competition 0 0 0 79 1 1 4 562
Political reputations and campaign promises 0 0 1 106 1 3 9 249
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 45 3 3 12 201
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 81 0 2 10 192
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 12 2 2 11 122
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 35 1 2 7 86
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 68 1 3 5 95
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 0 1 3 13 695
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 53
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 0 0 79 1 3 12 297
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 0 1 167 6 7 16 737
Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition 0 0 2 65 4 9 20 404
Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition 0 0 0 226 4 4 12 1,188
The Disadvantage of Winning an Election 0 0 0 5 4 6 13 131
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 1 2 90 3 6 12 271
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 35 0 0 5 145
The Key Party in the Catalan Government 0 0 0 49 3 4 13 282
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 59 1 7 27 341
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 78
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 24 3 7 15 557
Total Working Papers 1 7 18 3,566 108 201 552 24,981
7 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre 0 1 6 206 6 11 33 1,127
Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space 0 1 1 43 2 5 19 175
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 197 1 7 19 855
Government formation in a two dimensional policy space 0 0 0 31 1 3 6 128
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 8 0 1 13 101
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate 0 0 1 147 5 8 42 518
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 0 1 3 14 0 1 13 62
Political Reputations and Campaign Promises 0 1 3 69 2 6 13 288
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 14 3 6 14 106
The key party in the Catalan government 0 0 0 9 4 5 8 73
Total Journal Articles 0 4 14 738 24 53 180 3,433

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
approval voting 0 0 0 13 1 3 8 108
Total Chapters 0 0 0 13 1 3 8 108

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-05-06