Access Statistics for Enriqueta Aragones

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Dynamic Model of Multiparty Competition 0 0 0 31 1 1 1 167
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Understanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 0 0 381 1 2 4 1,673
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Undestanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 0 1 17 2 2 4 100
A Solution to the Envy-Free Selection Problem in Economies with Indivisible Goods 0 0 0 35 0 0 2 383
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 18 2 2 4 197
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 446 3 6 6 4,393
Ambiguity in election games 1 1 1 165 3 3 4 1,124
Approval Voting 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 37
Campaign rhetoric: A model of reputation 0 0 0 91 0 1 3 345
Candidate quality in a Downsian Model with a Continuous Policy Space 0 0 0 50 2 2 2 192
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 38 4 4 6 136
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 36 4 4 5 92
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 19 3 4 5 77
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 77 4 5 8 468
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 0 2 3 7 51
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 21 1 2 3 208
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 200 2 4 5 622
Imperfectly Informed Voters and Strategic Extremism 0 0 0 28 0 1 3 78
Imperfectly informed voters and strategic extremism 0 0 0 39 0 0 1 64
Incumbency (dis)advantage when citizens can propose Abstract:This paper analyses the problem that an incumbent faces during the legislature when deciding how to react to citizen proposals such as the outcome of referenda or popular initiatives. We argue that these proposals constitute a potential source of electoral disadvantage when citizens factor in their evaluation of the incumbent his reaction to these proposals. This is because an incumbent politician may jeopardize his re-election by implementing policies close to his preferred ones but unpopular among the electorate. We characterize conditions under which this potential disadvantage becomes in fact an electoral advantage for the incumbent. We fi nd that the choices of the incumbent during the legislature will be closest to citizens policy proposals when the intensity of electoral competition is neither too soft nor too tough. Finally, we use our results to discuss some implications of the use of mechanisms such as referenda and popular assemblies on electoral competition and on the incumbency advantage phenomenon 0 0 0 8 1 1 3 104
Making Statements and Approval Voting 0 0 0 66 1 1 2 399
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model With a Favored Candidate 0 0 0 120 2 2 3 706
Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate 0 0 0 91 1 5 6 418
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 0 0 0 20 3 3 5 312
Negativity effect and the emergence of ideologies 0 0 0 330 1 1 4 5,668
Negativity effect in multiparty electoral competition 0 0 0 79 0 0 0 558
Political reputations and campaign promises 0 0 1 106 0 0 2 242
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 81 1 1 3 184
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 45 2 4 4 193
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 686
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 35 1 1 2 80
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 12 2 2 6 116
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 68 0 1 2 91
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 45
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 0 0 79 2 2 3 287
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 1 1 167 1 4 4 725
Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition 0 1 2 65 0 1 4 388
Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition 0 0 0 226 1 2 4 1,179
The Disadvantage of Winning an Election 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 118
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 88 0 0 2 261
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 35 1 1 1 141
The Key Party in the Catalan Government 0 0 0 49 2 3 4 272
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 24 2 2 2 544
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 59 3 8 18 328
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 74
Total Working Papers 2 4 7 3,555 66 97 169 24,558
7 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre 1 3 5 204 2 7 17 1,107
Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space 0 0 0 42 7 8 8 164
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 197 0 0 3 836
Government formation in a two dimensional policy space 0 0 0 31 0 1 1 123
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 8 1 4 4 92
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate 0 0 0 146 1 2 12 483
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 0 0 1 12 0 2 5 54
Political Reputations and Campaign Promises 0 0 1 67 0 3 6 281
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 14 1 1 4 95
The key party in the Catalan government 0 0 0 9 0 1 2 66
Total Journal Articles 1 3 7 730 12 29 62 3,301

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
approval voting 0 0 0 13 0 0 4 101
Total Chapters 0 0 0 13 0 0 4 101

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Statistics updated 2025-12-06