Access Statistics for Enriqueta Aragones

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Dynamic Model of Multiparty Competition 0 0 0 31 2 3 3 169
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Understanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 0 0 381 3 5 7 1,676
A Model of Participatory Democracy: Undestanding the Case of Porto Alegre 0 0 1 17 0 2 4 100
A Solution to the Envy-Free Selection Problem in Economies with Indivisible Goods 0 0 0 35 0 0 2 383
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 18 1 3 4 198
Accuracy vs. Simplicity: A Complex Trade-Off 0 0 0 446 2 7 8 4,395
Ambiguity in election games 0 1 1 165 1 4 4 1,125
Approval Voting 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 37
Campaign rhetoric: A model of reputation 1 1 1 92 2 2 5 347
Candidate quality in a Downsian Model with a Continuous Policy Space 0 0 0 50 0 2 2 192
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 19 4 8 9 81
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 36 2 6 7 94
Electoral Competition through Issue Selection 0 0 0 38 1 5 7 137
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 77 0 5 8 468
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 21 1 2 4 209
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 52
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 200 1 5 6 623
Imperfectly Informed Voters and Strategic Extremism 0 0 0 28 2 2 5 80
Imperfectly informed voters and strategic extremism 0 0 0 39 1 1 2 65
Incumbency (dis)advantage when citizens can propose Abstract:This paper analyses the problem that an incumbent faces during the legislature when deciding how to react to citizen proposals such as the outcome of referenda or popular initiatives. We argue that these proposals constitute a potential source of electoral disadvantage when citizens factor in their evaluation of the incumbent his reaction to these proposals. This is because an incumbent politician may jeopardize his re-election by implementing policies close to his preferred ones but unpopular among the electorate. We characterize conditions under which this potential disadvantage becomes in fact an electoral advantage for the incumbent. We fi nd that the choices of the incumbent during the legislature will be closest to citizens policy proposals when the intensity of electoral competition is neither too soft nor too tough. Finally, we use our results to discuss some implications of the use of mechanisms such as referenda and popular assemblies on electoral competition and on the incumbency advantage phenomenon 0 0 0 8 2 3 5 106
Making Statements and Approval Voting 0 0 0 66 1 2 3 400
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 33
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model With a Favored Candidate 0 0 0 120 1 3 4 707
Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate 0 0 0 91 4 7 10 422
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 0 0 0 20 2 5 7 314
Negativity effect and the emergence of ideologies 0 0 0 330 2 3 6 5,670
Negativity effect in multiparty electoral competition 0 0 0 79 1 1 1 559
Political reputations and campaign promises 0 0 1 106 1 1 3 243
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 45 1 5 5 194
Reputation and Rhetoric in Elections 0 0 0 81 1 2 4 185
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 35 2 3 4 82
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 687
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 12 2 4 8 118
Rhetoric and Analogies 0 0 0 68 1 2 3 92
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 0 3 5 5 48
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 1 1 167 2 6 6 727
Spatial Competition Between Two Candidates of Different Quality: The Effects of Candidate Ideology and Private Information 0 0 0 79 2 4 5 289
Strategic Ambiguity in Electoral Competition 0 1 2 65 3 4 7 391
Strategic ambiguity in electoral competition 0 0 0 226 1 3 5 1,180
The Disadvantage of Winning an Election 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 118
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 35 1 2 2 142
The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 88 1 1 3 262
The Key Party in the Catalan Government 0 0 0 49 3 6 6 275
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 24 3 5 5 547
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 3 1 1 2 75
The disadvantage of winning an election 0 0 0 59 0 7 17 328
Total Working Papers 1 5 8 3,556 67 157 229 24,625
7 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A theory of participatory democracy based on the real case of Porto Alegre 1 2 5 205 4 9 19 1,111
Candidate quality in a Downsian model with a continuous policy space 0 0 0 42 5 13 13 169
Fact-Free Learning 0 0 0 197 2 2 5 838
Government formation in a two dimensional policy space 0 0 0 31 2 3 3 125
Making statements and approval voting 0 0 0 8 1 5 5 93
Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate 0 0 0 146 16 17 27 499
Negativity Effect and the Emergence of Ideologies 1 1 2 13 4 6 9 58
Political Reputations and Campaign Promises 1 1 2 68 1 4 7 282
Rhetoric and analogies 0 0 0 14 1 2 5 96
The key party in the Catalan government 0 0 0 9 0 1 2 66
Total Journal Articles 3 4 9 733 36 62 95 3,337

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
approval voting 0 0 0 13 0 0 4 101
Total Chapters 0 0 0 13 0 0 4 101

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Statistics updated 2026-01-09