| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| "Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
| "Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
4 |
9 |
10 |
168 |
| "Positional Views" as the Cornerstone of Sen's Idea of Justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
23 |
| 2022 French Presidential Election: Different Voting Methods, Different Outcomes? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
| 2022 French presidential election: different voting methods, different outcomes? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
16 |
| A Framed-field experiment on Approval voting and Evaluation voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
29 |
| A possible social choice. Democracy and positional judgments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
19 |
| A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
41 |
| A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
| A retrospective history of the new economic theories of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
21 |
| A return to Bentham's felicific calculus: From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
35 |
| A review of Adler's "Measuring social Welfare" |
0 |
0 |
1 |
34 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
57 |
| A review of M. Adler's 'Wellbeing and fair distribution. Beyond costbenefit analysis' |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| A review of Wulf Gaertner's 'A primer in Social Choice Theory' |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
23 |
| A review of “Beyond GDP: Measuring welfare and assessing sustainability", Marc Fleurbaey and Didier Blanchet. Oxford University Press, 2013, xvi+306 pages |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| A utility reading for the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
58 |
| Abram Bergson |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
81 |
| Abram Bergson |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
57 |
| An History of Welfare Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
39 |
| An History of Welfare Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
36 |
| An History of Welfare Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
35 |
| An History of Welfare Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
35 |
| An epistemological reading of the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
41 |
| An inquiry into Sen's concept of positional judgments for a possible democracy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
| Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
15 |
| Bergson |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
21 |
| Beyond the Consent Dilemma in Libertarian Paternalism, a Normative Void |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
24 |
| Bien-être individuel et justice sociale: fondement, caractérisation formelle et analyse normative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
50 |
| CBA, Sen's capabilities and other economic theories of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
26 |
| CITIZENS. Implication des citoyens dans la décision publique locale |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
29 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
57 |
| Citizen Knowledge & the debate on information in welfare economics in perspective. Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
15 |
| Citizen Knowledge and the Debate on Information in Welfare Economics in Perspective: Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
| Citizen Knowledge and the debate on information in welfare economics in perspective. Beyond the True-False and the Positive-Normative Entanglements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Collective interest vs. individual interest in Bentham's Felicific Calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
2 |
6 |
9 |
267 |
| Collective interest vs. individual interest in Bentham's felicific calculus. Questioning welfarism and fairness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
59 |
| Commensurable freedoms in the capability approach |
0 |
0 |
1 |
52 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
231 |
| Commensurable freedoms in the capability approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
21 |
| Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
52 |
| Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
53 |
| Conceptions of freedom and ranking opportunity sets. A typology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
181 |
| Conceptions of freedom and ranking opportunity sets. A typology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
404 |
| Conclusion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
21 |
| De l'économie du bien-être à la théorie de l'équité |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
38 |
484 |
| Do Grades Have Absolute Meaning? An Experiment on Majority Judgment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Don't reduce Amartya Sen to a single identity! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
17 |
| Don't reduce Amartya Sen to a single identity! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
84 |
7 |
9 |
9 |
166 |
| Economie du bien-être, théorie du choix social, théories économiques de la justice: l'histoire de l'économie normative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
51 |
| Electoral results and voting rules. Evidences from an in situ voting experiment during the 2012 French Presidential Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
19 |
| Entrevue avec Antoinette Baujard, Jean-Sébastine Gharbi, Christophe Salvat |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
| Equity in transportation: guidelines for stakeholders and practitioners |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
18 |
| Ethics and Technique in Welfare Economics: How Welfarism Evolves in the Making |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
| Ethics and technique in welfare economics: How welfarism evolves in the making |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
23 |
| Ethics and technique in welfare economics: How welfarism evolves in the making |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
| Experimentation and voting theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
| Framed-field experiments on approval voting in political contexts. Some teachings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
29 |
| From moral welfarism to technical non-welfarism: A step back to Bentham’s felicific calculus of its members |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89 |
6 |
10 |
10 |
516 |
| Home in the World: A Memoir |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
| How People Understand Voting Rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
| How People Understand Voting Rules |
0 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
3 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
| How People Understand Voting Rules |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
8 |
19 |
46 |
| How people understand voting rules |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
5 |
9 |
10 |
43 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
45 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
58 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
13 |
53 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
11 |
| Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
35 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
9 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
66 |
| Individual behavior under evaluative voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ Experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
27 |
| Individual behaviors facing different scales in evaluation voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
| Individual judgments and social choice in Sen's idea of justice and democracy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
152 |
| Individual judgments and social choice in Sen's idea of justice and democracy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
39 |
| Introduction: Revisiting the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
30 |
| Is Evaluative Voting Empirically Stable under Different Grading Scales? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
| Is there a link between Saint-Simonian ability and the capability approach to social justice? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
21 |
| L'estimation des préférences individuelles pour la décision publique. Problèmes, paradoxes, enjeux |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
218 |
| L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l' économie du bien-être ! |
0 |
1 |
3 |
134 |
4 |
9 |
17 |
503 |
| L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l'économie du bien-être ! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
43 |
| L'économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l'économie du bien-être ! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
59 |
| L'économie, une science normative ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
23 |
| La démocratie dans l’expertise économique. Yes, we can! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
| La participation des citoyens aux expérimentations sur les modes de scrutin |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
61 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
17 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
24 |
| Les modes de scrutin en débat |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
41 |
| Les théories économiques de la justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
24 |
| L’invisibilisation du commun Le rôle et les enseignements de la théorie du choix social et de l’économie du bien-être |
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
20 |
| Making commons (in-)visible |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Making what's common invisible |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Matthew D. Adler, Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| Methodological challenges in Experimental Political Sciences. A review of “Experimental Political Science. Principles and Practices”, Edited by Bernhard Kittel, Wolfgang J. Luhan and Rebecca B. Morton, Palgrave Macmillan, ECPR, 2012, 280+xiv p |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
| Normative Criteria of Social Choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
8 |
60 |
| Normes et normativité en économie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
| Normes et normativité en économie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
| Normes et normativité en économie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
11 |
| Not-so-strategic Voters |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
41 |
| Not-so-strategic voters. Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
44 |
| Not-so-strategic voters.Evidence from an in situ experiment during the 2017 French presidential election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
| Penser l’aide à la décision publique autrement. Amartya Sen et le débat sur l’information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
22 |
| Positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
28 |
| Positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
35 |
| Quatre cadres d’analyse pour la normativité et la légitimité dans les prescriptions économiques de politiques publiques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
18 |
| Quatre modèles pour penser à la normativité des recommandations de politique par les économistes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
14 |
| Quels cadres d'analyse de la normativité des évaluations économiques de politiques publiques? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
| Re-evaluating the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
23 |
| Reconciling agency and impartiality: positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice |
0 |
2 |
3 |
33 |
0 |
13 |
14 |
53 |
| Reconciling agency and impartiality: positional views as the cornerstone of Sen’s idea of justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
| Reconstructing preferences in a voting context |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
29 |
| Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
16 |
| Retelling the Story of the 2017 French Presidential Election: The contribution of Approval Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
10 |
11 |
44 |
| Revisiting the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
111 |
5 |
11 |
14 |
248 |
| Revisiting the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
4 |
9 |
10 |
77 |
| Revisiting the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
3 |
78 |
5 |
8 |
20 |
183 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
49 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
9 |
35 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
7 |
11 |
12 |
72 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
9 |
38 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
33 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
37 |
| Sen is not a capability theorist |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
5 |
10 |
12 |
82 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
23 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
13 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
22 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
4 |
8 |
13 |
62 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
58 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
48 |
| Some Annoying Grading Scale Effects under Different Versions of Evaluative Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
6 |
15 |
18 |
63 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
10 |
27 |
| Statement on the vote and the election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
| Subjective wellbeing and welfare analysis: Problems and solutions for adaptive preferences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
16 |
| The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
27 |
| The birth of the capability approach in the context of the welfarist criticism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
24 |
| The birth of the capability approach in the context of the welfarist criticism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
27 |
| The capacity to confuse: rescuing the Saint-Simonian notion of ability from modern capability theories of social justice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
34 |
| The capacity to confuse: rescuing the Saint-Simonian notion of ability from modern capability theories of social justice |
0 |
0 |
1 |
34 |
2 |
5 |
11 |
86 |
| The internal inconsistency of welfarism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
24 |
| The sense of the act of voting depends on rules. A teaching from in situ voting experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
26 |
| The sense of the act of voting depends on rules. A teaching from in situ voting experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
| The value of choice: Experimental approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
35 |
| Thinking the help of public decision making differently. Amartya K. Sen and the debate on information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| Thinkinking the help of public decision making differently. Amartya K. Sen and the debate on information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
| Une critique opérationnelle du welfarisme dans la prise de décision publique |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
99 |
| Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
6 |
12 |
21 |
438 |
| Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
66 |
| Utilitarianism and anti-utilitarianism |
0 |
1 |
2 |
125 |
5 |
8 |
11 |
665 |
| Utilité et liberté de choix dans les classements d'ensembles d'opportunités |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
28 |
| Value judgment and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
57 |
| Value judgment and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
31 |
| Value judgment and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
7 |
10 |
35 |
| Value judgments and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
31 |
| Value judgments and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
33 |
| Value judgments and economics expertise |
1 |
1 |
3 |
21 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
59 |
| Value judgments and economics expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
3 |
9 |
15 |
112 |
| Value judgments in economic expertise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
29 |
| Values in Welfare Economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
| Values in Welfare economics |
0 |
1 |
2 |
33 |
6 |
7 |
11 |
54 |
| Values in Welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
7 |
8 |
14 |
39 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
29 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
20 |
| Vote, pouvoir et modes de scrutin dans les sociétés cotées. L'éclairage des théories mathématiques du vote |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
47 |
| Vote, pouvoir et modes de scrutin dans les sociétés cotées: l'éclairage des théories mathématiques du vote |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
46 |
| Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
48 |
| Voting Experiments |
2 |
2 |
5 |
27 |
12 |
15 |
20 |
29 |
| Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
36 |
36 |
36 |
| Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Welfare Theory, Public Action and Ethical Values: Revisiting the history of welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
46 |
| Welfare and the consistency of welfarism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
17 |
| Welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
156 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
220 |
| Welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
5 |
99 |
3 |
9 |
24 |
324 |
| Welfare economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
126 |
| Welfarism, an historical perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
28 |
| Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
9 |
14 |
19 |
183 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
57 |
| Élection présidentielle 2022: Autres modes de scrutin, autres résultats ? |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
9 |
| Total Working Papers |
6 |
25 |
56 |
2,382 |
434 |
803 |
1,176 |
10,823 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.