Access Statistics for Randall Bluffstone

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Biogas: clean energy access with low-cost mitigation of climate change 0 0 0 45 3 4 17 64
Can improved biomass cookstoves contribute to REDD+ in low-income countries ? evidence from a controlled cooking test trial with randomized behavioral treatments 0 0 0 39 1 8 20 107
Challenges in assessing the costs of household cooking energy in lower-income countries 0 0 0 9 4 5 9 41
Child Labor, the Wealth Paradox, and Common Forest Management in Bolivia 0 0 0 73 1 4 21 166
Community Controlled Forests, Carbon Sequestration and REDD+: Some Evidence from Ethiopia 0 0 0 35 4 4 7 128
Community managed forest groups and preferences for REDD contract attributes: a choice experiment survey of communities in Nepal 0 0 0 25 1 2 12 68
Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal 0 0 0 84 8 8 12 83
Corporate environmental management in transition economies: The case of Central and Eastern Europe 0 0 0 32 1 1 26 142
Deforestation and forest degradation are estimated to account for between 12 percent and 20 percent of annual greenhouse gas emissions. These activities, largely in the developing world, released about 5.8 Gt per year in the 1990s, which was more than all forms of transport combined. The idea behind REDD+ is that payments for sequestering carbon can tip the economic balance away from loss of forests and in the process yield climate benefits. Recent analysis has suggested that developing country carbon sequestration can effectively compete with other climate investments as part of a cost-effective climate policy. This paper focuses on opportunities and complications associated with bringing community-controlled forests into REDD+. About 25 percent of developing country forests are community controlled; therefore, it is difficult to envision a successful REDD+ program without coming to terms with community controlled forests. It is widely agreed that REDD+ offers opportunities to bring value to developing country forests, but there are also concerns related to insecure and poorly defined community forest tenure, informed by often long histories of government unwillingness to meaningfully devolve ownership rights to communities. Further, because communities are complicated systems, there is also concern that REDD+ could destabilize existing well-functioning community forestry systems 0 0 1 9 0 0 11 118
Do Improved Biomass Cookstoves Reduce PM2.5 Concentrations ? If So, for Whom ? Empirical Evidence from Rural Ethiopia 0 0 0 45 0 0 6 55
Do improved biomass cookstoves reduce fuelwood consumption and carbon emissions ? evidence from rural Ethiopia using a randomized treatment trial with electronic monitoring 0 0 0 79 3 6 15 96
Does Participatory Forest Management Increase Forest Resource Use to Cope with Shocks? Empirical Evidence from Ethiopia 0 1 1 3 4 5 19 27
Does collective action sequester carbon ? the case of the Nepal community forestry program 0 0 0 54 4 4 11 51
Economics of Soil Conservation Adoption in High-Rainfall Areas of the Ethiopian Highlands 0 0 0 7 1 3 11 68
Economics of Soil Conservation Adoption in High-Rainfall Areas of the Ethiopian Highlands 0 0 0 58 2 3 13 229
Estimated Values of Carbon Sequestration Resulting from Forest Management Scenarios 0 0 0 17 1 5 9 36
Forest Carbon Supply in Nepal: Evidence from a Choice Experiment 0 0 0 9 3 4 10 50
Impact of soil conservation on crop production in the Northern Ethiopian Highlands 0 0 0 69 0 4 10 439
Impacts of Improved Biomass Cookstoves on Child and Adult Health: Experimental Evidence from Rural Ethiopia 0 0 0 11 0 0 7 50
Improved Biomass Cookstove Use in the Longer Run: Results from a Field Experiment in Rural Ethiopia 0 0 0 6 4 5 11 29
Improved cook stoves for climate change mitigation ? evidence of values, preferences and carbon savings from a choice experiment in Ethiopia 0 0 0 18 4 7 14 77
Is There a Link between Common Property Forest Management and Private Tree Growing? Evidence of Behavioral Effects from Highland Ethiopia 0 0 0 18 2 2 6 74
Measuring risk preferences in rural Ethiopia: Risk tolerance and exogenous income proxies 0 0 0 58 1 2 10 96
Measuring risk preferences in rural Ethiopia: risk tolerance and exogenous income proxies 0 0 0 22 0 0 4 114
OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY POLICY FOR CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 13
Preferences for REDD+ contract attributes in low-income countries: a choice experiment in Ethiopia 0 0 0 32 3 5 11 63
REDUCING DEGRADATION OF FORESTS IN POOR COUNTRIES WHEN PERMANENT SOLUTIONS ELUDE US: WHAT INSTRUMENTS DO WE REALLY HAVE? 0 0 1 6 2 4 10 34
Reducing Degradation of Forests in Poor Countries When Permanent Solutions Elude Us: What Instruments Do we Really Have? 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 1,070
Risk aversion in low-income countries: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia 0 1 3 178 4 9 26 539
Risk aversion in low-income countries: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia [in Amharic] 0 0 1 15 2 2 8 109
Rural Livelihoods, Poverty, and the Millennium Development Goals: Evidence from Ethiopian Survey Data 0 0 1 41 4 6 18 206
Stability and Evolution of Preferences for Improved Cookstoves -- A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of a Choice Experiment from Ethiopia 0 0 0 29 1 1 12 61
The improved biomass stove saves wood, but how often do people use it ? evidence from a randomized treatment trial in Ethiopia 0 0 1 79 4 4 17 130
Wealth and Time Preference in Rural Ethiopia 0 0 3 206 5 9 41 620
Total Working Papers 0 2 12 1,411 78 129 445 5,253

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Combined Energy and Geoengineering Optimization Model (CEAGOM) for climate and energy policy analysis 0 0 0 3 4 4 10 31
An assessment of collective action drivers of carbon storage in Nepalese forest commons 0 0 0 2 1 1 7 24
Are soil conservation technologies “win‐win?” A case study of Anjeni in the north‐western Ethiopian highlands 0 0 0 2 2 3 9 34
Are the costs of pollution abatement lower in Central and Eastern Europe? Evidence from Lithuania 0 0 0 16 3 3 11 130
Biogas: Clean Energy Access with Low-Cost Mitigation of Climate Change 0 0 0 13 2 6 12 99
Community forests, carbon sequestration and REDD+: evidence from Ethiopia 0 0 0 7 0 1 6 44
Consumption Discount Rates, Risk Aversion and Wealth in Low-Income Countries: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Ethiopia 0 0 0 13 1 2 6 41
Cooperative behavior and common pool resources: Experimental evidence from community forest user groups in Nepal 0 0 0 4 4 6 15 44
Corporate Environmental Management in Transition Economies: The Case of Central and Eastern Europe 0 0 0 25 3 3 12 143
Does Collective Action Sequester Carbon? Evidence from the Nepal Community Forestry Program 0 0 0 2 1 4 10 40
Does Community Forest Collective Action Promote Private Tree Planting? Evidence from Ethiopia 0 0 0 3 3 4 7 34
Does better common property forest management promote behavioral change? On-farm tree planting in the Bolivian Andes1 0 0 0 19 1 2 7 84
Environmental Liability and Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: Toward an Optimal Policy 0 0 0 29 3 3 7 120
Estimating the Present Value of Carbon Sequestration in U.S. Forests, 2015–2050, for Evaluating Federal Climate Change Mitigation Policies 0 0 1 6 1 1 3 23
Explaining Environmental Management in Central and Eastern Europe 0 0 0 13 0 2 13 80
Fuel savings, cooking time and user satisfaction with improved biomass cookstoves: Evidence from controlled cooking tests in Ethiopia 1 1 3 70 1 4 13 251
HOUSING, SPRAWL, AND THE USE OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES: THE CASE OF THE INLAND EMPIRE 0 0 0 28 2 3 15 135
How Much Will It Cost to Join the Club? The Extra Costs of Approximating Lithuanian Environmental Laws with Those of the European Union 0 0 0 5 3 3 7 142
Livestock and Private Tree Holdings in Rural Ethiopia: The Effects of Collective Action Institutions, Tenure Security and Market Access 0 0 0 2 1 1 8 28
Measuring Risk Preferences in Rural Ethiopia 0 0 0 19 4 6 13 78
Mixing economic and administrative instruments: the case of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand 0 0 0 45 3 4 11 191
Optimal energy resource mix for the US and China to meet emissions pledges 0 0 0 4 4 4 7 45
Poverty, Risk Aversion, and Path Dependence in Low-Income Countries: Experimental Evidence from Ethiopia 0 0 7 191 2 9 33 463
Privatization and contaminated site remediation in Central and Eastern Europe: Do environmental liability policies matter? 0 0 0 18 4 4 8 82
REDD+and community-controlled forests in low-income countries: Any hope for a linkage? 0 0 0 15 4 5 12 87
Randall Bluffstone and Bruce A. Larson (eds), Controlling Pollution in Transition Economies: Theories and Methods, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, 1997. ISBN 1 85898 452 1 0 0 0 16 1 1 7 71
Reducing degradation of forests in poor countries when permanent solutions elude us: what instruments do we really have? 0 0 0 47 3 3 10 154
The Economics of Household Air Pollution 0 1 1 50 1 4 11 218
The Effect of Labor Market Performance on Deforestation in Developing Countries under Open Access: An Example from Rural Nepal 1 1 1 105 1 1 11 291
Upgrading municipal environmental services to European Union levels: a case study of household willingness to pay in Lithuania 0 0 0 43 1 3 9 172
WAREHOUSES, TRUCKS, AND PM2.5: HUMAN HEALTH AND LOGISTICS INDUSTRY GROWTH IN THE EASTERN INLAND EMPIRE 0 2 4 51 4 10 15 136
Total Journal Articles 2 5 17 866 68 110 325 3,515

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-05-06