| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| "Eviter le mal ou… faire le bien": gestion des biens environnementaux et politiques de développement durable |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
12 |
| "Eviter le mal ou… faire le bien": gestion des biens environnementaux et politiques de développement durable |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
9 |
12 |
| A Choice Experiment To Test Commitment Flexibility And Peer-learning In Agrienvironmental Schemes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
| A structural estimation of French farmers’ risk preferences: an artefactual field experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
16 |
50 |
| A structural estimation of French farmers’ risk preferences: an artefactual field experiment |
1 |
1 |
1 |
94 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
258 |
| Accounting for spatially heterogeneous preferences while managing invasive species: a choice experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
42 |
| Accounting for spatially heterogeneous preferences while managing invasive species: a choice experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
| Agri-environmental contracts and improving sequences of payments: A choice experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| Améliorer les outils numériques d’aide à la décision pour la protection phytosanitaire des cultures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
| An online experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
| Are consumers willing to pay for farmers’ Use of carbon offsets ? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
| Atouts et limites des politiques de préservation de l'environnement par les consommateurs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
16 |
| Benefiting from a clean environment versus undertaking efforts to protect the environment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
26 |
| Buy local, pollute less: What drives households to join a community supported farm? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
176 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
542 |
| Buy local, pollute less: What drives households to join a community supported farm? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
58 |
| Buy local, pollute less: what drives households to join a community supported farm? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
36 |
| Can Positional Concerns Enhance the Private provision of Public Goods? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
166 |
| Can ecolabeling mitigate market failures ? An analysis applied to agro-food products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| Can labelling policies do more harm than good ? An analysis applied to environmental labelling schemes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
17 |
| Community Supported Agriculture and Preferences for Risk and Fairness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
69 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
135 |
| Conditions d’efficacité d’un éco-étiquetage sur les produits alimentaires |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
7 |
| Consolidated report on case studies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
12 |
| Consumer Inequality Aversion and Risk Preferences in Community Supported Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
34 |
| Consumers' valuation of environmental attributes: an experimental study applied to orange juice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
| Cooperation and framing effects in provision point mechanisms: Experimental evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
44 |
| Creating versus maintaining threshold public goods in conservation policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
| Creating vs maintaining threshold public goods in conservation contracts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
33 |
| Creating vs. maintaining threshold public goods in conservation policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
23 |
| Creating vs. maintaining threshold public goods in conservation policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
29 |
| Creating vs. maintaining threshold public goods in conservation policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
28 |
| Dealing with aversion to the sucker's payoff in public goods games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
23 |
| Dealing with the aversion to the sucker’s payoff in public goods game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
157 |
| Des mesures agro-environnementales innovantes pour sortir des pesticide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
| Designing Agri-Environmental Schemes to cope with uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
| Designing Agri-Environmental Schemes to cope with uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
23 |
| Designing Agri-Environmental Schemes to cope with uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
| Designing Agri-Environmental Schemes to cope with uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
12 |
| Designing Agri-Environmental Schemes to cope with uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
49 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
15 |
| Designing ecolabels in order to mitigate market failures: an application to agrofood products |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
26 |
| Do Risk Preferences Really Matter? The Case of Input Use in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
| Do Risk Preferences Really Matter? The Case of Pesticide Use in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
3 |
30 |
88 |
| Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
21 |
| Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
35 |
| Do farmers prefer increasing, decreasing, or stable payments in Agri-Environmental Schemes? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
35 |
| Do positional preferences cause welfare gains? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
32 |
| Do risk preferences really matter? the case of pesticide use in agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
27 |
| Do risk preferences really matter? the case of pesticide use in agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
11 |
| Does aversion to the sucker's payoff matter in public goods games? |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
40 |
| Does aversion to the sucker's payoff matter in public goods games? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
71 |
0 |
6 |
14 |
635 |
| Développement durable: conservation et création de biens environnementaux. Une étude expérimentale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
| Développement durable: conservation et création de biens environnementaux. Une étude expérimentale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
24 |
| ESNIE 2005 Project: Analysis of agro-environmental schemes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
18 |
| Eco-Labeled Food Products: What are Consumers Paying for ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
49 |
| Eco-labelled food products: what are consumers paying for? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
78 |
| Economic performance in organic farming in France: incentive or disincentive to convert? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
52 |
| Efficacité des marchés avec coûts d'information sur la qualité: une application aux produits écolabellisés |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
32 |
| Eliciting Preferences for Sequences of Payment in Agri-Environmental Schemes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Eliciting Risk Preferences: A Field Experiment on a Sample of French Farmers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
83 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
235 |
| Expériences économiques en économie agricole: état des lieux et dynamiques de recherche |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
32 |
| Fairness Preferences in Risk: Evidence from an Online Experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
| Farmers' risk preferences in eleven European farming systems: A multi-country replication of Bocquého et al. (2014) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
64 |
| Farmers’ preferences over conservation contract flexibility and duration: an estimation of the effect of transaction costs using choice experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
76 |
| Fertilizer use and risk: New evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
12 |
| Fertilizer use and risk: New evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
44 |
| Fertilizer use and risk: New evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
9 |
| Flat cross country comparison of WP3 individual reports |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
| Follow-up of farmers in Basse-Normandie: qualitative information (technical organisation of the follow-up) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
12 |
| Gestion et environnement: anatomie d'une relation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
| How Well Can Experts Predict Farmers' Choices in Risky Gambles? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
11 |
| How Well Can Experts Predict Farmers' Risk Preferences ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
22 |
| How Well Can Experts Predict Farmers' Risk Preferences ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
14 |
| How Well Can Experts Predict Farmers’ Choices in Risky Gambles? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
117 |
| How can transaction cost economics help regulators choose between environmental policy instruments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
| How laboratory experiments could help disentangle the influences of production risk and risk preferences on input decisions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
4 |
22 |
129 |
| How to design AES to cope with uncertainty? Insights from the option value |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
| How to make promises without having to fulfill them? An application to the food stamp program (SNAP) and rebate schemes |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
24 |
| How well can experts predict farmers’ risk preferences? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
35 |
| Impact of decoupled payments and cross-compliance on decisions to withdraw land from production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
| Impact of private labels and information campaigns on organic and fair trade food demand |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
30 |
| Impact of private labels and information campaigns on organic and fair trade food demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
28 |
| Impact of private labels and information campaigns on organic and fair trade food demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
36 |
| Impact of private labels and information campaigns onorganic and fair trade food demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
30 |
| Impact of private labels and promotion on ecolabeled food |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
32 |
| Innovativeness, innovation adoption and priming: Nudging farmers in a large-scale randomized experiment in France |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
18 |
| Innovativeness, innovation adoption and priming: Nudging farmers in a large-scale randomized experiment in France |
0 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
69 |
| Is decentralization of agri-environmental policy welfare enhancing ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
| L'exclusion des produits agroalimentaires du dispositif d'écolabellisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
12 |
| L'éco-labellisation: comment viser l'efficacité de l'étiquetage ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
| L'éco-étiquetage des produits est-il crédible ? Proposition d'un cadre d'analyse |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
39 |
| L'écolabellisation des produits agro-alimentaires: un complément aux autres instruments des politiques environnementales ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
30 |
| Le mode de faire valoir influence-t-il la mise en œuvre de la politique agro-environnementale ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
39 |
| Les outils numériques d’aide à la décision pour la réduction des pesticides: une perspective économique |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
| L’agriculture locale sous contrat direct: une opportunité de développement durable pour les territoires périurbains ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
16 |
| L’utilisation de l’économie expérimentale en économie agricole |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
10 |
| Making or buying environmental public goods: do consumers care? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
19 |
| Making or buying environmental public goods: do consumers care? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
162 |
| Marchés avec coûts d'information sur la qualité des biens: une application aux produits écolabellisés |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
32 |
| Marchés avec coûts d'information sur la qualité des biens: une application aux produits écolabellisés |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
9 |
30 |
| Mesure de l'attitude des agriculteurs vis-à-vis du risque |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
| Mesure de l'aversion au risque des agriculteurs de Vivescia. Premiers résultats de l’enquête commune INRA-Arvalis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
47 |
| Mieux comprendre la demande et l'offre dans les AMAP (Associations de Maintien de l'Agriculture Paysanne), Bilan du projet Métaprogramme DID'IT « Déterminants et impact de la diète, interactions et transitions » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Mise en perspective et discussion de l'exclusion des produits agro-alimentaires du dispositif d'écolabellisation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
| Nudger les agriculteurs innovants: une application à l’adoption du label bas-carbone |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
31 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
3 |
44 |
76 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
37 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
35 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
1 |
5 |
21 |
122 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
47 |
| On the role of probability weighting on WTP for crop insurance with and without yield skewness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
26 |
| Performance économique des exploitations biologiques et conventionnelles: levier économique à la conversion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
| Potential impact of Single Farm Payments on French landowners’ decisions to withdraw land from production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
19 |
| Promoting crop pest control by plant diversification in agricultural landscapes: A conceptual framework for analysing feedback loops between agro-ecological and socio-economic effects |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
11 |
60 |
| Protecting crops with plant diversity: Agroecological promises, socioeconomic lock-in, and political levers |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
43 |
47 |
| Préférences vis-à-vis du risque et choix d'intrants: le cas des pesticides |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
| Risk Taking and Skewness Seeking Behavior in a Demographically Diverse Population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
1 |
7 |
23 |
37 |
| Risk Taking and Skewness Seeking Behavior in a Demographically Diverse Population* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
31 |
| Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries |
0 |
0 |
1 |
35 |
0 |
3 |
15 |
56 |
| Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries |
0 |
0 |
1 |
35 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
34 |
| Risk Taking with Left- and Right-Skewed Lotteries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| Risk Taking with Left-and Right-Skewed Lotteries * |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
11 |
| Risk-Taking and Skewness-Seeking Behavior in a Demographically Diverse Population* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
10 |
| Risk-taking and skewness-seeking behavior in a demographically diverse population |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
20 |
| Réputation environnementale en agro-alimentaire: "milieu de production" versus "processus de production" |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
| Rôle de l’aversion au risque des agriculteurs dans l’utilisation de pesticides et implications pour la régulation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
20 |
| Self-protection and self-insurance in pest management: The role of risk preferences and beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
8 |
| Self-protection and self-insurance in pest management: The role of risk preferences and beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
| Spatial preferences for invasion management: a choice experiment on the control of Ludwigia grandiflora in a French regional park |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
19 |
| The 'Make or Buy' Decision in Private Environmental Transactions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
57 |
| The Impact of Farmers’ Risk Preferences on the Design of an Individual Yield Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
2 |
41 |
0 |
4 |
17 |
108 |
| The impact of farmers' risk preferences on the design of an individual yield crop insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
100 |
| The impact of farmers' risk preferences on the design of an individual yield crop insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
70 |
| The ‘Make or Buy’ decision in private environmental transactions |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
76 |
| Using choice experiment to estimate the magnitude of transaction costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
41 |
| Who Can Predict Farmers' Choices in Risky Gambles? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
13 |
| « Éviter le mal ou... faire le bien »: gestion des biens environnementaux et politiques de développement durable Une étude expérimentale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
31 |
| Total Working Papers |
3 |
5 |
21 |
1,386 |
27 |
327 |
1,225 |
6,048 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.