| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A New Family of Cumulative Indexes for Measuring Scientific Performance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
| A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
| A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
63 |
| A multilevel meta-analysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
98 |
| A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
103 |
| A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses |
0 |
0 |
2 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
117 |
| A proposal for a First-Citation-Speed-Index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
| Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| Allegation of scientific misconduct increases Twitter attention |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
| Alternative metrics in scientometrics: a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
50 |
| An empirical look at the nature index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
| Applying the CSS method to bibliometric indicators used in (university) rankings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
34 |
| Are there any frontiers of research performance? Efficiency measurement of funded research projects with the Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis for count data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
10 |
32 |
| Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
| Are there really two types of h index variants? A validation study by using molecular life sciences data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
| At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
60 |
| BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
37 |
| Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
32 |
| Bibliometrics-based decision tree (BBDT) for deciding whether two universities in the Leiden ranking differ substantially in their performance |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
28 |
| Calculating the excellence shift: How efficiently do institutions produce highly cited papers? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
| Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
49 |
| Change of perspective: bibliometrics from the point of view of cited references—a literature overview on approaches to the evaluation of cited references in bibliometrics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
44 |
| Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
30 |
| Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
| Citation score normalized by cited references (CSNCR): The introduction of a new citation impact indicator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
90 |
| Citation speed as a measure to predict the attention an article receives: An investigation of the validity of editorial decisions at Angewandte Chemie International Edition |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
| Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
30 |
| Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use? |
1 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
4 |
7 |
22 |
151 |
| Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| Complex tasks and simple solutions: The use of heuristics in the evaluation of research |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Confidence intervals for Journal Impact Factors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
34 |
| Convergent validation of peer review decisions using the h index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Convergent validity of bibliometric Google Scholar data in the field of chemistry—Citation counts for papers that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition or rejected but published elsewhere, using Google Scholar, Science Citation Index, Scopus, and Chemical Abstracts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
70 |
| Core elements in the process of citing publications: Conceptual overview of the literature |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
54 |
| Correction to: Normalisation of citation impact in economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
57 |
| Creativity in science and the link to cited references: Is the creative potential of papers reflected in their cited references? |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
41 |
| Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
34 |
| Cross-disciplinary research: What configurations of fields of science are found in grant proposals today? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
| Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
38 |
| Detecting the historical roots of tribology research: a bibliometric analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
42 |
| Die Normierung von Zitaten in der Volkswirtschaftslehre |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
27 |
| Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Discussion about the new Nature Index |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
74 |
| Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
54 |
| Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics: meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019) |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
32 |
| Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
42 |
| Distributions instead of single numbers: Percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
19 |
| Do Universities or Research Institutions With a Specific Subject Profile Have an Advantage or a Disadvantage in Institutional Rankings? A Latent Class Analysis With Data From the SCImago Ranking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
| Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
69 |
| Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics |
0 |
1 |
2 |
25 |
2 |
5 |
10 |
174 |
| Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
18 |
| Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
| Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
27 |
| Do we need the E-index in addition to the h-index and its variants? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
| Do we need the E‐index in addition to the h‐index and its variants? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
| Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
| Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
22 |
| Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
58 |
| Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
34 |
| Does the normalized citation impact of universities profit from certain properties of their published documents – such as the number of authors and the impact factor of the publishing journals? A multilevel modeling approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
46 |
| Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
| Ein Meta-Ranking volkswirtschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
45 |
| Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
| Excellence networks in science: A Web-based application based on Bayesian multilevel logistic regression (BMLR) for the identification of institutions collaborating successfully |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
| Extent of type I and type II errors in editorial decisions: A case study on Angewandte Chemie International Edition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| Field classification of publications in Dimensions: a first case study testing its reliability and validity |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
45 |
| Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
| Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Field‐normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
| From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
| From black box to white box at open access journals: predictive validity of manuscript reviewing and editorial decisions at Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
| Gatekeepers of science—Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
| Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis |
1 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
79 |
| Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Gould, T.H.P. ( 2013 ). Do we still need peer review? An argument for change. Scarecrow Press: Plymouth, UK |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references |
1 |
2 |
7 |
70 |
5 |
11 |
29 |
337 |
| Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
| Heuristics as conceptual lens for understanding and studying the usage of bibliometrics in research evaluation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
29 |
| Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
| HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
65 |
| Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan’s research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| How Efficiently Do Elite US Universities Produce Highly Cited Papers? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| How accurately does Thomas Kuhn’s model of paradigm change describe the transition from the static view of the universe to the big bang theory in cosmology? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
59 |
| How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
31 |
| How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
| How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
| How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
33 |
| How much does the expected number of citations for a publication change if it contains the address of a specific scientific institute? A new approach for the analysis of citation data on the institutional level based on regression models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A proposal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons |
0 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
70 |
| How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
29 |
| How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top‐cited papers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
27 |
| How to calculate the practical significance of citation impact differences? An empirical example from evaluative institutional bibliometrics using adjusted predictions and marginal effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
66 |
| How to detect indications of potential sources of bias in peer review: A generalized latent variable modeling approach exemplified by a gender study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
34 |
| How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations |
0 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
69 |
| How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
40 |
| How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
102 |
| How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
21 |
| How well does a university perform in comparison with its peers? The use of odds, and odds ratios, for the comparison of institutional citation impact using the Leiden Rankings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| Identifying single influential publications in a research field: new analysis opportunities of the CRExplorer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
37 |
| Identifying “hot papers” and papers with “delayed recognition” in large-scale datasets by using dynamically normalized citation impact scores |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| In public peer review of submitted manuscripts, how do reviewer comments differ from comments written by interested members of the scientific community? A content analysis of comments written for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
18 |
| Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
68 |
| Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
19 |
| Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient |
0 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
102 |
| Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
35 |
| Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization |
0 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
113 |
| Is collaboration among scientists related to the citation impact of papers because their quality increases with collaboration? An analysis based on data from F1000Prime and normalized citation scores |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high‐impact submissions? A study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
| Is the h index related to (standard) bibliometric measures and to the assessments by peers? An investigation of the h index by using molecular life sciences data |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
36 |
| Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
40 |
| Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
| Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
24 |
| Letter to the Editor: On the conceptualisation and theorisation of the impact caused by publications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
38 |
| Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
| Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data |
1 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
37 |
| Measuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
| Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
75 |
| Metrics to evaluate research performance in academic institutions: a critique of ERA 2010 as applied in forestry and the indirect H2 index as a possible alternative |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| Mimicry in science? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
| Multilevel-statistical reformulation of citation-based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
| Multilevel‐statistical reformulation of citation‐based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
| Multiple publication on a single research study: Does it pay? The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
| Nature's top 100 revisited |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
| New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
44 |
| Normalisation of citation impact in economics |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
63 |
| Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
43 |
| Normalization of Mendeley reader impact on the reader- and paper-side: A comparison of the mean discipline normalized reader score (MDNRS) with the mean normalized reader score (MNRS) and bare reader counts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
57 |
| Normalization of zero-inflated data: An empirical analysis of a new indicator family and its use with altmetrics data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
56 |
| On scientific misconduct |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
| On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| On the function of university rankings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
| Overlay maps based on Mendeley data: The use of altmetrics for readership networks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Panel peer review of grant applications: what do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision-making in groups? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
27 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
63 |
| Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| Philosophy of science viewed through the lense of “Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy” (RPYS) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
| Plots for visualizing paper impact and journal impact of single researchers in a single graph |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
| Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: how often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
38 |
| Potential sources of bias in research fellowship assessments: effects of university prestige and field of study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
29 |
| Productivity does not equal usefulness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45 |
| Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
49 |
| Quality and impact considerations in bibliometrics: a reply to Ricker (in press) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
| R package for producing beamplots as a preferred alternative to the h index when assessing single researchers (based on downloads from Web of Science) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
46 |
| Ranking institutions by the handicap principle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS) with publications in the area of academic efficiency studies: what are the historical roots of this research topic? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
34 |
| Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
55 |
| Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
| Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field-normalized bibliometric indicator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
| Replicability and the public/private divide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
| Research Misconduct—Definitions, Manifestations and Extent |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
| Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
55 |
| Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
| Sampling issues in bibliometric analysis |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
50 |
| Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
| Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
| Sequence analysis of annually normalized citation counts: an empirical analysis based on the characteristic scores and scales (CSS) method |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
59 |
| Slow reception and under-citedness in climate change research: A case study of Charles David Keeling, discoverer of the risk of global warming |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
39 |
| Social origin and gender of doctoral degree holders |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| Stata commands for importing bibliometric data and processing author address information |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
159 |
| Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
| Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
| Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
| Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
42 |
| The Anna Karenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
71 |
| The Anna Karenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
43 |
| The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
44 |
| The Hawthorne effect in journal peer review |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
42 |
| The Normalization of Citation Counts Based on Classification Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
| The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
| The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
35 |
| The citation speed index: A useful bibliometric indicator to add to the h index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
35 |
| The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science—A visualization approach by using density maps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
| The effect of a two-stage publication process on the Journal Impact Factor: a case study on the interactive open access journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
| The effect of several versions of one and the same manuscript published by a journal on its journal impact factor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| The emergence of plate tectonics and the Kuhnian model of paradigm shift: a bibliometric case study based on the Anna Karenina principle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
32 |
| The graduation shift of German universities of applied sciences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
| The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
54 |
| The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
| The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
40 |
| The interest of the scientific community in expert opinions from journal peer review procedures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
| The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
27 |
| The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
| The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies” |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
43 |
| The problem of citation impact assessments for recent publication years in institutional evaluations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
| The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
| The problem of percentile rank scores used with small reference sets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
| The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
43 |
| The reception of publications by scientists in the early days of modern science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
21 |
| The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
44 |
| The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits |
0 |
1 |
3 |
34 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
843 |
| The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
| The validity of staff editors’ initial evaluations of manuscripts: a case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| The value and credits of n-authors publications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
32 |
| The wisdom of citing scientists |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
| Thomas theorem in research evaluation |
0 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
3 |
11 |
53 |
179 |
| Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
23 |
| Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): the legend of the Darwin finches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
24 |
| Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
27 |
| Types of research output profiles: A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund's final project report data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
| Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
54 |
| Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
29 |
| What are the top five journals in economics? A new meta-ranking |
0 |
1 |
7 |
46 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
171 |
| What do altmetrics counts mean? A plea for content analyses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
32 |
| What do citation counts measure? An updated review of studies on citations in scientific documents published between 2006 and 2018 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
59 |
| What do we know about the h index? |
0 |
1 |
7 |
20 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
72 |
| What factors determine citation counts of publications in chemistry besides their quality? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
110 |
| What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey |
0 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
1 |
2 |
26 |
119 |
| What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
15 |
69 |
| What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
41 |
| What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
21 |
| Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
| Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
| Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
27 |
| Which differences can be expected when two universities in the Leiden Ranking are compared? Some benchmarks for institutional research evaluations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
| Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
| Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
53 |
| Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
| Zur Effizienz deutscher Universitäten und deren Entwicklung zwischen 2004 und 2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
40 |
| Zur Messung von Forschungsleistungen in der Effizienzanalyse: Drittmittel versus Publikationen |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
| hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
| “Smart girls†versus “sleeping beauties†in the sciences: The identification of instant and delayed recognition by using the citation angle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
| Total Journal Articles |
7 |
18 |
99 |
1,202 |
92 |
202 |
769 |
9,462 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.