| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
24 |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
12 |
| Cournot Competition on the Hotelling Line Yields at Most Three Varieties |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
13 |
15 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
24 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
63 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
2 |
3 |
25 |
542 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
26 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
22 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
11 |
23 |
| Endogenous market structures, product liability, and the scope of product differentiation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
54 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
95 |
| Endogenous market structures, product liability, and the scope of product differentiation |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
18 |
| Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design |
0 |
0 |
1 |
78 |
2 |
3 |
17 |
111 |
| Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
10 |
| Enforcement of merger control: theoretical insights for its procedural design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
33 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
17 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
10 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
37 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
13 |
52 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
92 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
123 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
19 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
84 |
| Environmental liability and product customization choices: strict liability vs negligence revisited |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
10 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
192 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
455 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
26 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
1 |
1 |
163 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
194 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
20 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
21 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
0 |
12 |
20 |
30 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
11 |
29 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
124 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
306 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
34 |
| Horizontal mergers in the circular city: a note |
0 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
347 |
| Horizontal mergers on platform markets: cost savings v. cross-group network effects? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
94 |
4 |
6 |
21 |
219 |
| Horizontal mergers, cost savings, and network effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
21 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
27 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
29 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
20 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
22 |
| Incentives to differentiate under environmental liability laws: Product customization and precautionary effort |
0 |
0 |
2 |
31 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
60 |
| Incentives to differentiate under environmental liability laws: Product customization and precautionary effort |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
19 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
12 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
139 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
21 |
| Learning by Litigation:An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
34 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
2 |
35 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
57 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
15 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
14 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
13 |
| Les défis posés par l’économie numérique aux politiques de concurrence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
29 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
28 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
27 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
24 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
35 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
40 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
10 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
68 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
152 |
| Merger Control on Two-Sided Markets: Is There Need for an Efficiency Defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
17 |
100 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
44 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
60 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
31 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
2 |
2 |
28 |
149 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
28 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
24 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
42 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
13 |
82 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficinecy defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
171 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
253 |
| Merger selection, evidence provision, and the timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
12 |
| Merger selection, evidence provision, and the timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
38 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
69 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
40 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
245 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
167 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
412 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
93 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
116 |
| On the effective design of the efficiency defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
165 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
597 |
| On the law and economics of public interest defense for cartels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
28 |
| Product Liability Influences Incentives for Horizontal Mergers |
0 |
0 |
2 |
29 |
3 |
9 |
31 |
79 |
| Product Liability Influences Incentives for Horizontal Mergers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
29 |
| Product liability influences incentives for horizontal mergers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
16 |
| Settlement in Merger Cases: Remedies and Litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
128 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
356 |
| Settlement in Merger Cases: Remedies and Litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
16 |
20 |
| Substantive Law and Antitrust Liability Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
16 |
| Success and failure of bargaining in merger control: The case of asset divestitures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
| Upward Price Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Feedback Effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
14 |
| Upward Price Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Feedback Effects |
1 |
1 |
2 |
183 |
2 |
7 |
27 |
418 |
| Upward Pricing Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Rebalancing Effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
44 |
| Where to locate to escape predation? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
30 |
| Total Working Papers |
2 |
4 |
18 |
2,435 |
146 |
204 |
1,013 |
7,428 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.