| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
| Contrôle des concentrations et lutte anticartels: substituts ou compléments ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| Cournot Competition on the Hotelling Line Yields at Most Three Varieties |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
53 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| Cournot competition in spatial markets: some complementary results on complementarity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
148 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
515 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| Do remedies affect the efficiency defense? An optimal merger-control analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| Endogenous market structures, product liability, and the scope of product differentiation |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
| Endogenous market structures, product liability, and the scope of product differentiation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
77 |
| Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
| Enforcement of Merger Control: Theoretical insights for its Procedural Design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
89 |
| Enforcement of merger control: theoretical insights for its procedural design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
91 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
107 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
69 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
| Enforcement vs Deterrence in Merger Control: Can Remedies Lead to Lower Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| Environmental liability and product customization choices: strict liability vs negligence revisited |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
13 |
| Ex post or ex ante? On the optimal timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
192 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
442 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of Enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
162 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
184 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| Fight Cartels or Control Mergers? On the Optimal Allocation of enforcement Efforts within Competition Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
| Horizontal market concentration: Theoretical insights from the spatial models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
123 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
285 |
| Horizontal mergers in the circular city: a note |
0 |
0 |
0 |
90 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
332 |
| Horizontal mergers on platform markets: cost savings v. cross-group network effects? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
93 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
197 |
| Horizontal mergers, cost savings, and network effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
| How procedures shape substance: Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| How procedures shape substance: institutional design and antitrust evidentiary standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| Incentives to differentiate under environmental liability laws: Product customization and precautionary effort |
0 |
0 |
3 |
28 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
38 |
| Incentives to differentiate under environmental liability laws: Product customization and precautionary effort |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
1 |
1 |
54 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
125 |
| Institutional Design and Antitrust Evidentiary Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| Learning by Litigation:An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
18 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
40 |
| Learning by litigating: An application to antitrust commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| Les défis posés par l’économie numérique aux politiques de concurrence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
| Litigation, Settlement, and the Role of Legal Precedent: An Application to Antitrust Commitments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
1 |
1 |
68 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
140 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| Market collusion with joint harm and liability sharing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
21 |
| Merger Control on Two-Sided Markets: Is There Need for an Efficiency Defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
82 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
26 |
| Merger control on two- sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
53 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
22 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
67 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficiency defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
115 |
| Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficinecy defense? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
171 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
237 |
| Merger selection, evidence provision, and the timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
| Merger selection, evidence provision, and the timing of merger control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
| Negotiating remedies: Revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
30 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
58 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
167 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
397 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
230 |
| Negotiating remedies: revealing the merger efficiency gains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
33 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
85 |
| On the Effective Design of the Efficiency Defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
103 |
| On the effective design of the efficiency defence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
165 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
582 |
| On the law and economics of public interest defense for cartels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
25 |
| Product Liability Influences Incentives for Horizontal Mergers |
1 |
2 |
9 |
26 |
2 |
4 |
32 |
45 |
| Product Liability Influences Incentives for Horizontal Mergers |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
19 |
| Settlement in Merger Cases: Remedies and Litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
128 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
343 |
| Settlement in Merger Cases: Remedies and Litigation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Substantive Law and Antitrust Liability Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
| Success and failure of bargaining in merger control: The case of asset divestitures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
| Upward Price Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Feedback Effects |
0 |
0 |
1 |
181 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
387 |
| Upward Price Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Feedback Effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
| Upward Pricing Pressure in Two-Sided Markets: Incorporating Rebalancing Effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
| Where to locate to escape predation? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
| Total Working Papers |
4 |
7 |
25 |
2,410 |
9 |
45 |
227 |
6,300 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.