Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
"The Laws of Returns Under Competitive Conditions": Progress in Microeconomics since Sraffa (1926)? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
250 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
694 |
A Pareto-Improving Way to Teach Principles of Economics: Evidence from the University of Toronto |
0 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
44 |
CAPITAL CONTROVERSY FROM BÖHM-BAWERK TO BLISS: BADLY POSED OR VERY DEEP QUESTIONS? OR WHAT “WE” CAN LEARN FROM CAPITAL CONTROVERSY EVEN IF YOU DON'T CARE WHO WON |
0 |
2 |
3 |
41 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
82 |
Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium [A Review Article] |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
197 |
Comments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
Economic Thought - The State and the Economic System: An Introduction to the History of Political Economy. By Phyllis Deane. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Pp. xii, 205. $36.00, cloth; $11.95, paper |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
58 |
Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
Factor substitution and induced innovation in north American kraft pulping: 1914-1940 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
55 |
Introduction to JEE symposium on “What should go into the only economics course students will ever take?” |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Issues in the Cambridge Controversies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
Most Wonderful Machine: Mechanization and Social Change in Berkshire Paper Making, 1801–1885. By Judith A. McGaw. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987. Pp. xvii, 439. $40.00 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
45 |
Phil Weyerhaeuser: Lumberman. By Charles E. Twining. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1985. Pp. xvii, 401. $25.00 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
Prices, Capital, and the One-Commodity Model in Neoclassical and Classical Theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
Reading Lists in History of Economic Thought |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? |
1 |
1 |
4 |
210 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
816 |
Scalable, scaffolded writing assignments with online peer review in a large introductory economics course |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
Stabilizing Dynamics: Constructing Economic Knowledge. By E. Roy Weintraub. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Pp. x, 177. $39.50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
THE MYTHOLOGY OF CAPITAL OR OF STATIC EQUILIBRIUM? THE BÖHM-BAWERK/CLARK CONTROVERSY |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
57 |
Teaching-Track Economists in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Teaching-Track Economists: A Canadian Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Technological Change as Historical Process: The Case of the U.S. Pulp and Paper Industry, 1915–1940 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
The Hayek/Knight Capital Controversy: The Irrelevance of Roundaboutness, or Purging Processes in Time? |
0 |
0 |
4 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
76 |
The Kaldor/Knight controversy: Is capital a distinct and quantifiable factor of production? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
153 |
The Methodological Resolution of the Cambridge Controversies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
Veblen Contra Clark and Fisher: Veblen-Robinson-Harcourt lineagesin capital controversies and beyond |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
52 |
What do we want students to (know and) be able to do: Learning outcomes, competencies, and content in literacy-targeted principles courses |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? (With comments by L. Pasinetti, F. Fisher, J. Felipe and J. McCombie, R. Greenfield and reply by the authors) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
Total Journal Articles |
1 |
7 |
28 |
703 |
5 |
16 |
68 |
2,607 |