Access Statistics for Vincent de Gardelle

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
An implicit representation of stimulus ambiguity in pupil size 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 5
An implicit representation of stimulus ambiguity in pupil size 0 0 0 0 2 7 7 9
An implicit representation of stimulus ambiguity in pupil size 0 0 0 0 1 4 5 7
Auditory Perception: Laurel and Yanny Together at Last 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 19
Auditory Perception: Laurel and Yanny Together at Last 0 0 0 0 1 5 15 37
Auditory Perception: Laurel and Yanny Together at Last 0 1 1 1 0 3 7 24
Confidence as a Priority Signal 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 14
Confidence as a Priority Signal 0 0 0 0 2 4 6 13
Confidence as a Priority Signal 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 25
From local to global estimations of confidence in perceptual decisions 0 0 0 6 1 5 10 24
How Overconfidence Bias Influences Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making 0 0 0 9 0 3 4 13
How Overconfidence Bias Influences Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making 0 0 0 19 0 1 4 25
How Overconfidence Bias Influences Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making 0 0 0 9 0 3 6 14
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 15
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 24
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 24
Hydrocortisone decreases metacognitive efficiency independent of perceived stress 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 9
Hydrocortisone decreases metacognitive efficiency independent of perceived stress 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 15
Hydrocortisone decreases metacognitive efficiency independent of perceived stress 0 0 0 0 2 4 5 15
Individual differences in decision-making: A test of a one-factor model of rationality 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 22
Individual differences in decision-making: A test of a one-factor model of rationality 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 13
Individual differences in decision-making: A test of a one-factor model of rationality 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 7
Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 6
Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4
Interindividual variability in auditory scene analysis revealed by confidence judgements 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 14
Metacognitive ability predicts learning cue-stimulus associations in the absence of external feedback 0 0 0 18 0 1 3 32
Metacognitive ability predicts learning cue-stimulus associations in the absence of external feedback 0 0 0 39 0 3 5 34
Metacognitive ability predicts learning cue-stimulus associations in the absence of external feedback 0 0 0 7 0 2 5 15
NOBEL, LE JEU DE LA DECOUVERTE SCIENTIFIQUE 0 0 0 14 1 2 2 120
No evidence of biased updating in beliefs about absolute performance: A replication and generalization of Grossman and Owens (2012) 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9
No evidence of biased updating in beliefs about absolute performance: A replication and generalization of Grossman and Owens (2012) 0 0 0 4 0 1 6 13
No evidence of biased updating in beliefs about absolute performance: A replication and generalization of Grossman and Owens (2012) 0 0 0 4 0 6 7 14
Overestimate yourself or underestimate others? Two sources of bias in bargaining with joint production 0 0 0 47 0 6 7 90
Overestimate yourself or underestimate others? Two sources of bias in bargaining with joint production 0 0 0 11 0 1 2 27
Overestimate yourself or underestimate others? Two sources of bias in bargaining with joint production 0 0 0 50 0 2 4 93
The Confidence Database 0 0 0 3 0 6 9 64
The Confidence Database 0 0 0 10 0 4 4 35
The Confidence Database 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 14
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence 0 0 1 1 0 1 4 22
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 7
The impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 14
Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 11
Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 12
Unsuppressible Repetition Suppression and exemplar-specific Expectation Suppression in the Fusiform Face Area 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 13
Total Working Papers 0 1 2 257 18 130 209 1,036
12 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Confidence as a Common Currency between Vision and Audition 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 11
How does symbolic success affect redistribution in left-wing voters? A focus on the 2017 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 25
How economic success shapes redistribution: The role of self-serving beliefs, in-group bias and justice principles 0 0 0 14 0 3 8 50
I did most of the work! Three sources of bias in bargaining with joint production 0 0 1 4 2 5 10 21
No evidence of biased updating in beliefs about absolute performance: A replication and generalization of Grossman and Owens (2012) 0 0 0 2 2 11 12 25
The confidence-noise confidence-boost (CNCB) model of confidence rating data 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 3
Total Journal Articles 0 0 1 20 4 27 42 135
1 registered items for which data could not be found
logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-03-04