Access Statistics for Franz Dietrich

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 22 1 1 1 57
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 22 0 0 3 14
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 28
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 4
A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 7
A Joint Characterization of Belief Revision Rules 0 0 0 7 1 4 5 63
A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence 0 0 0 80 1 3 4 620
A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change 0 0 0 10 0 1 2 76
A Theory Of Bayesian Groups 0 1 1 38 2 3 3 40
A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation 0 0 1 94 1 2 8 473
A model of non-informational preference change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
A model of non-informational preference change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
A model of non-informational preference change 0 0 0 23 1 1 2 92
A model of non-informational preference change 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 40
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 24
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 13
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 0 64 1 2 4 287
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 1 15 1 3 8 147
A reason-based theory of rational choice 0 0 0 35 1 1 4 91
A response to Baltag, Girard, and White 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
A response to Baltag, Girard, and White 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21
A theory of Bayesian groups 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 5
A theory of Bayesian groups 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 22
A theory of Bayesian groups 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 3
Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 13
Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 10
Aggregating causal judgements 0 0 0 16 0 1 1 117
Aggregating causal judgments 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6
Aggregating causal judgments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Aggregating causal judgments 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 5
Aggregation and the relevance of some issues for others 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 91
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 8
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 0 4 2 4 5 44
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 0 15 1 2 4 19
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 0 28 1 1 1 123
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 9
Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking 0 0 0 0 2 3 3 13
Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking 0 0 0 0 3 4 7 16
Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Anti-terrorism politics and the risk of provoking 0 0 0 37 1 2 4 172
Arrow's Theorem in Judgement Aggregation 0 0 0 161 1 1 3 665
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation 0 0 0 30 1 1 3 140
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation 0 0 0 39 1 1 2 112
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 24
Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: the extended Kalai-Smorodinsky solution 0 0 0 30 0 1 1 90
Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: the extended Kalai-Smorodinsky solution 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 20
Bayesian group belief 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 16
Bayesian group belief 0 0 0 29 1 2 3 90
Bayesian group belief 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 28
Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules 0 0 0 14 0 0 2 12
Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3
Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules 0 0 0 28 0 0 1 34
Belief revision generalized: a joint characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 23
Beyond Belief: Logic in Multiple Attitudes 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 19
Beyond Belief: Logic in Multiple Attitudes 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 9
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 6
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 9 1 1 2 8
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 4
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 5 1 1 4 8
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 15 0 0 2 15
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 7 0 2 3 5
Categorical versus graded beliefs 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 6
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 40 1 2 3 72
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 20 1 1 3 25
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 13 1 1 1 11
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 11
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 20
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 5 2 2 2 12
Decision Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 31 1 1 2 47
Decision Under Normative uncertainty 0 0 0 21 0 0 2 51
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 7
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds 0 2 5 5 3 7 14 16
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds 0 0 1 9 0 3 4 13
Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds 0 0 0 11 1 3 3 21
Deliberation and the wisdom of crowds 0 0 0 8 0 2 3 6
Dynamically rational judgment aggregation 0 0 0 18 1 4 4 24
Dynamically rational judgment aggregation 0 0 0 3 2 2 2 13
Dynamically rational judgment aggregation 0 0 0 3 4 4 4 14
Epistemic democracy with defensible premises 0 0 0 17 0 1 4 109
Epistemic democracy with defensible premises 0 0 0 2 1 2 3 63
Epistemic democracy with defensible premises 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 32
Epistemic democracy with defensible premises 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Expected Value Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 9
Expected Value Under Normative Uncertainty 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 23
From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory 0 0 0 36 0 0 1 59
From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 6
From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7
From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 13 0 1 1 9
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 13 2 2 5 42
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 15
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 8 3 3 4 19
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 6 0 1 2 15
Fully Bayesian Aggregation 0 0 0 5 2 3 4 28
Independent opinions? 0 0 0 16 1 1 2 105
Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 25
Independent opinions? on the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems 0 0 0 21 1 1 3 46
Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 8
Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Judgement Aggregation in Search for the Truth 0 0 0 12 2 2 3 88
Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 20
Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation 0 0 0 0 5 6 6 18
Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 18
Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation 1 1 1 16 1 3 5 105
Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma 0 0 0 18 1 1 2 45
Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 11
Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8
Judgment aggregation by quota rules 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 238
Judgment aggregation in general logics 0 0 0 106 1 3 5 647
Judgment aggregation in search for the truth 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28
Judgment aggregation in search for the truth 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 6
Judgment aggregation in search for the truth 0 0 0 0 3 3 6 13
Judgment aggregation on restricted domains 0 0 0 20 0 1 1 126
Judgment aggregation under constraints 0 0 0 12 0 0 1 73
Judgment aggregation with consistency alone 0 0 0 7 2 2 2 56
Judgment aggregation without full rationality 0 0 0 17 1 3 3 118
Judgment aggregation without full rationality 0 0 0 22 0 1 1 140
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 8
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 20
Jury Theorems 0 1 1 27 0 1 2 40
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4
Jury Theorems 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3
Majority voting on restricted domains 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 32
Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective 0 0 0 87 3 3 3 35
Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 11
Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 17
Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective 0 0 0 111 3 6 10 226
Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective 0 0 0 43 2 6 6 88
Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 23
Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework 0 0 0 22 0 1 1 143
Opinion Pooling under Asymmetric Information 0 0 0 97 1 1 2 354
Opinion pooling on general agendas 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 31
Opinion pooling on general agendas" 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 153
Possible worlds in modal logic 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8
Possible worlds in modal logic 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9
Possible worlds in modal logic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Probabilistic Opinion Pooling 0 3 6 31 1 6 12 108
Probabilistic opinion pooling 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15
Probabilistic opinion pooling 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 38
Probabilistic opinion pooling 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part one: General agendas 0 0 0 13 1 2 3 40
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part two: The premise-based approach 0 0 0 14 1 2 4 29
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas 0 0 0 15 1 1 3 27
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas 0 0 0 0 3 4 5 7
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas 0 0 0 11 2 2 3 21
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 15
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 6
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach 0 0 0 7 1 3 4 18
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach 0 0 0 13 2 2 3 25
Propositionwise judgment aggregation 0 0 0 54 0 1 1 98
Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 16
Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18
Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10
Reason-Based Rationalization 0 0 0 9 2 2 4 45
Reason-Based Rationalization 0 1 1 31 2 3 4 65
Reason-Based Rationalization 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 63
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework 0 0 0 25 2 2 2 21
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework 0 0 0 50 2 2 4 84
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework 0 0 0 52 6 8 9 33
Reason-based choice and context-dependence: an explanatory framework 0 0 0 77 2 4 5 52
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 5
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 5
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
Reasoning in attitudes 0 0 1 10 0 0 2 21
Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 110
Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Reasons for (prior) belief in bayesian epistemology 0 0 0 32 0 2 4 99
Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness 0 0 0 16 1 2 2 35
Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness 0 1 1 18 0 2 5 38
Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness 0 0 1 5 1 3 7 15
Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness 0 0 0 12 1 3 4 14
Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 13 0 0 3 83
Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 12 1 1 3 34
Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 24 1 2 3 42
Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 12
Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 11
Scoring rules for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 0 3 3 4 9
Scoring rules for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Scoring rules for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 35 1 2 2 66
Scoring rules for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 9
Social Epistemology 0 0 1 27 0 0 2 123
Social Epistemology 0 0 0 35 1 1 6 30
Social Epistemology 0 0 0 22 3 4 5 30
Strategy-proof judgment aggregation 0 0 0 53 0 2 2 310
Strategy-proof judgment aggregation 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 91
Strategy-proof judgment aggregation 0 0 0 16 2 2 3 154
Strategy-proof judgment aggregation 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 42
Terrorism Prevention: A General Model 0 0 0 259 2 3 6 830
The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
The Premiss-Based Approach to Logical Aggregation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
The Rational Group 0 0 0 12 1 2 5 21
The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6
The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4
The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory 0 0 0 44 3 4 4 190
The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation 0 0 7 7 0 0 5 5
The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 8
The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation 0 0 1 3 1 1 5 7
The impossibility of unbiased judgement aggregation 0 0 0 232 0 1 1 1,168
The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation 0 0 0 19 1 2 2 110
The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation (updated version) 0 0 0 37 0 0 1 198
The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas 0 0 1 20 0 0 1 159
The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 37
The premises of condorcet's jury theorem are not simultaneously justified 1 1 1 38 2 3 6 221
The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 150
The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 43
The premiss-based approach to logical aggregation 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 125
The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem 0 0 0 17 0 2 4 28
The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem 0 0 0 27 2 4 5 244
The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem 0 0 0 5 1 2 2 7
Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l'agrégation logique 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 27
Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l’agrégation logique 0 0 0 38 1 1 3 129
Welfare vs. Utility 0 0 10 10 0 0 14 14
Welfarism, Preferencism, Judgmentism 0 0 0 73 2 2 2 318
What are Social Norms? 2 2 11 44 2 2 16 39
What matters and how it matters: A choice-theoretic representation of moral theories 0 0 0 29 0 1 3 56
What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 21
What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 13
What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 8
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 13 1 2 3 94
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 14 0 0 1 108
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 100 4 5 5 197
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 1 0 4 6 50
Where do preferences come from? A summary 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 8
Where do preferences come from? A summary 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 24
Total Working Papers 4 13 53 3,857 195 346 637 15,238
12 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A generalised model of judgment aggregation 0 0 0 36 3 6 7 157
A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 137
A model of non-informational preference change 0 0 0 9 1 1 2 60
Abstract rationality: the ‘logical’ structure of attitudes 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 6
Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others 0 0 1 3 1 1 4 44
Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 48
Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation 0 0 0 31 0 1 3 170
Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: The extended Kalai–Smorodinsky solution 0 0 0 10 2 2 4 62
Bayesian group belief 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 33
Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Jeffrey's rules 0 0 0 8 0 1 3 48
Decision under normative uncertainty 0 1 3 4 0 1 3 13
Deliberation and the wisdom of crowds 1 2 3 3 3 6 8 8
Dynamically rational judgment aggregation 0 0 1 1 1 1 5 5
EPISTEMIC DEMOCRACY WITH DEFENSIBLE PREMISES1 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 35
Fully Bayesian aggregation 0 0 0 6 1 3 4 21
General Representation of Epistemically Optimal Procedures 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 61
How to reach legitimate decisions when the procedure is controversial 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 50
Introduction to the special issue “Beliefs in Groups” of Theory and Decision 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 13
Judgment Aggregation By Quota Rules 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 22
Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation 0 0 0 5 0 3 4 50
Judgment aggregation in search for the truth 0 0 0 6 4 4 6 45
Judgment aggregation without full rationality 0 0 0 13 2 2 3 77
Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems 0 0 0 22 3 4 5 107
MENTALISM VERSUS BEHAVIOURISM IN ECONOMICS: A PHILOSOPHY-OF-SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE 0 0 2 10 2 2 5 49
Majority voting on restricted domains 0 0 0 15 2 2 3 89
Modelling change in individual characteristics: An axiomatic framework 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 64
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21
Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach 0 0 0 1 2 5 8 31
Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case 0 0 0 2 1 1 4 39
REASON-BASED CHOICE AND CONTEXT-DEPENDENCE: AN EXPLANATORY FRAMEWORK 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 35
STRATEGY-PROOF JUDGMENT AGGREGATION* 0 0 0 4 1 1 4 81
Savage's theorem under changing awareness 0 0 0 9 1 1 1 48
Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 18
Scoring rules for judgment aggregation 0 0 0 2 3 5 8 34
The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 50
The limiting distribution of the t-ratio for the unit root test in an AR(1) 0 0 0 15 11 14 15 1,097
The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications 0 0 0 4 0 1 2 56
The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation 0 0 0 10 2 2 2 82
Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l'agrégation logique 0 0 0 6 0 1 5 58
Where do preferences come from? 0 0 0 16 0 0 2 86
Total Journal Articles 1 3 10 311 51 84 150 3,210

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Statistics updated 2025-12-06