| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
64 |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
32 |
| A Broomean model of rationality and reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
| A Joint Characterization of Belief Revision Rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
72 |
| A Model of Jury Decisions Where All Jurors Have the Same Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
628 |
| A Model of Non-Informational Preference Change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
82 |
| A Theory Of Bayesian Groups |
0 |
0 |
1 |
38 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
52 |
| A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
94 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
486 |
| A model of non-informational preference change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| A model of non-informational preference change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| A model of non-informational preference change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
8 |
| A model of non-informational preference change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
98 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
150 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
297 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
19 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
29 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
46 |
| A reason-based theory of rational choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
101 |
| A response to Baltag, Girard, and White |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
| A response to Baltag, Girard, and White |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
27 |
| A theory of Bayesian groups |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
32 |
| A theory of Bayesian groups |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
| A theory of Bayesian groups |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
12 |
| Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
| Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
14 |
| Abstract rationality: the 'logical' structure of attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
18 |
| Aggregating causal judgements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
129 |
| Aggregating causal judgments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
| Aggregating causal judgments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
| Aggregating causal judgments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
| Aggregation and the relevance of some issues for others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
96 |
| Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
26 |
| Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
| Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
58 |
| Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
127 |
| Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
18 |
| Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
28 |
| Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
| Anti-terrorism policies and the risk of provoking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
| Anti-terrorism politics and the risk of provoking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
181 |
| Arrow's Theorem in Judgement Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
162 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
670 |
| Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
147 |
| Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
34 |
| Arrow’s theorem in judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
121 |
| Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: the extended Kalai-Smorodinsky solution |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
96 |
| Bargaining with endogenous disagreement: the extended Kalai-Smorodinsky solution |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
26 |
| Bayesian group belief |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
44 |
| Bayesian group belief |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
23 |
| Bayesian group belief |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
96 |
| Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
42 |
| Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
15 |
| Belief revision generalized: A joint characterization of Bayes' and Je¤rey's rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
9 |
| Belief revision generalized: a joint characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
29 |
| Beyond Belief: Logic in Multiple Attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
17 |
| Beyond Belief: Logic in Multiple Attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
25 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
12 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
10 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
10 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| Categorical versus graded beliefs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
15 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
25 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
51 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
19 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
77 |
| Decision Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
35 |
| Decision Under Normative uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
60 |
| Decision under normative uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
23 |
| Decision under normative uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
| Decision under normative uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
| Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
18 |
| Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
31 |
| Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
10 |
| Deliberation and the wisdom of crowds |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
16 |
| Dynamically rational judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
21 |
| Dynamically rational judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
30 |
| Dynamically rational judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
18 |
| Epistemic democracy with defensible premises |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
76 |
| Epistemic democracy with defensible premises |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
| Epistemic democracy with defensible premises |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
34 |
| Epistemic democracy with defensible premises |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
121 |
| Expected Value Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
| Expected Value Under Normative Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
33 |
| From degrees of belief to beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
69 |
| From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
| From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
| From degrees of belief to binary beliefs: Lessons from judgment-aggregation theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
55 |
71 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
20 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
16 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
22 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
33 |
| Fully Bayesian Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
47 |
| Independent opinions? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
115 |
| Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
19 |
| Independent opinions? On the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
34 |
| Independent opinions? on the causal foundations of belief formation and jury theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
55 |
| Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
17 |
| Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
9 |
| Introduction to the special issue "Beliefs in Groups" of Theory and Decision |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
| Judgement Aggregation in Search for the Truth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
127 |
| Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
29 |
| Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
21 |
| Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
21 |
| Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
2 |
5 |
19 |
121 |
| Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
17 |
| Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
53 |
| Judgment aggregation and the discursive dilemma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
21 |
| Judgment aggregation by quota rules |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
245 |
| Judgment aggregation in general logics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
106 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
657 |
| Judgment aggregation in search for the truth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
23 |
| Judgment aggregation in search for the truth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
30 |
| Judgment aggregation in search for the truth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
15 |
| Judgment aggregation on restricted domains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
132 |
| Judgment aggregation under constraints |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
75 |
| Judgment aggregation with consistency alone |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
61 |
| Judgment aggregation without full rationality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
150 |
| Judgment aggregation without full rationality |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
129 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
22 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
| Jury Theorems |
0 |
1 |
2 |
28 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
65 |
| Majority voting on restricted domains |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
41 |
| Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
87 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
42 |
| Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
15 |
| Mentalism Versus Behaviourism in Economics: A Philosophy-of-Science Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
| Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
1 |
2 |
22 |
104 |
| Mentalism versus behaviourism in economics: a philosophy-of-science perspective |
0 |
0 |
1 |
112 |
1 |
1 |
29 |
249 |
| Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
155 |
| Modelling change in individual characteristics: an axiomatic framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
| Opinion Pooling under Asymmetric Information |
0 |
0 |
0 |
97 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
366 |
| Opinion pooling on general agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
36 |
| Opinion pooling on general agendas" |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
159 |
| Possible worlds in modal logic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
| Possible worlds in modal logic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
13 |
| Possible worlds in modal logic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
| Probabilistic Opinion Pooling |
1 |
2 |
6 |
34 |
1 |
6 |
29 |
131 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
45 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
22 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
18 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part one: General agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
49 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized Part two: The premise-based approach |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
38 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
30 |
43 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
17 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: General agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
33 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
29 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
24 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
10 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: The premise-based approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
| Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part two: the premise-based approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
35 |
| Propositionwise judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
9 |
9 |
15 |
112 |
| Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
24 |
| Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
20 |
| Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
30 |
| Reason-Based Rationalization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
50 |
| Reason-Based Rationalization |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
72 |
| Reason-Based Rationalization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
70 |
| Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
0 |
1 |
40 |
65 |
| Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
94 |
| Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
31 |
| Reason-based choice and context-dependence: An explanatory framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
19 |
| Reason-based choice and context-dependence: an explanatory framework |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
65 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
13 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
6 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
12 |
| Reasoning in attitudes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
| Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
19 |
| Reasons for (prior) belief in Bayesian epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
114 |
| Reasons for (prior) belief in bayesian epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
107 |
| Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
22 |
| Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
8 |
8 |
19 |
52 |
| Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness |
0 |
0 |
2 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
47 |
| Savage's Theorem Under Changing Awareness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
20 |
| Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
39 |
| Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
2 |
5 |
14 |
54 |
| Savage's response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
91 |
| Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
14 |
| Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
18 |
| Savage’s response to Allais as Broomean reasoning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
16 |
| Scoring rules for judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
2 |
8 |
40 |
104 |
| Scoring rules for judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
| Scoring rules for judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
| Scoring rules for judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
38 |
44 |
| Social Epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
130 |
| Social Epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
37 |
| Social Epistemology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
38 |
| Strategy-proof judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
316 |
| Strategy-proof judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
98 |
| Strategy-proof judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
50 |
| Strategy-proof judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
164 |
| Terrorism Prevention: A General Model |
0 |
0 |
0 |
259 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
838 |
| The Premiss-Based Approach to Judgment Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
24 |
| The Premiss-Based Approach to Logical Aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
38 |
| The Rational Group |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
34 |
| The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
| The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
| The Relation between Degrees of Belief and Binary Beliefs: A General Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
| The aggregation of propositional attitudes: towards a general theory |
0 |
0 |
1 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
199 |
| The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
12 |
| The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
14 |
| The impossibility of non-manipulable probability aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
13 |
| The impossibility of unbiased judgement aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
232 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1,180 |
| The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
125 |
| The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation (updated version) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
203 |
| The possibility of judgment aggregation for network agendas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
167 |
| The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
44 |
| The premises of condorcet's jury theorem are not simultaneously justified |
0 |
0 |
1 |
38 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
231 |
| The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
53 |
| The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
155 |
| The premiss-based approach to logical aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
134 |
| The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
251 |
| The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
12 |
| The relation between degrees of belief and binary beliefs: A general impossibility theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
38 |
| Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l'agrégation logique |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
30 |
| Un bilan interprétatif de la théorie de l’agrégation logique |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
137 |
| Welfare vs. Utility |
0 |
0 |
22 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
14 |
| Welfare vs. Utility |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
| Welfare vs. Utility |
0 |
0 |
21 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
6 |
| Welfare vs. Utility |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
27 |
| Welfarism, Preferencism, Judgmentism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
329 |
| What are Social Norms? |
0 |
0 |
2 |
44 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
46 |
| What are Social Norms? |
0 |
0 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
| What matters and how it matters: A choice-theoretic representation of moral theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
81 |
| What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
18 |
| What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
29 |
| What matters and how it matters: a choice-theoretic representation of moral theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| Where do preferences come from? |
0 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
19 |
111 |
| Where do preferences come from? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
117 |
| Where do preferences come from? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
26 |
| Where do preferences come from? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
221 |
| Where do preferences come from? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
61 |
| Where do preferences come from? A summary |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
12 |
| Where do preferences come from? A summary |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
26 |
| Total Working Papers |
2 |
5 |
90 |
3,930 |
101 |
192 |
2,301 |
17,178 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.