Access Statistics for Antonio M. Espín

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Accepting Zero in the Ultimatum Game Does Not Reflect Selfish Preferences 0 0 1 89 3 4 8 156
Accepting Zero in the Ultimatum Game: Selfish Nash Response? 0 0 0 97 1 1 2 185
BMI is not related to altruism, fairness, trust or reciprocity: Experimental evidence from the field and the lab 0 0 0 69 1 3 5 173
Born this way? Prenatal exposure to testosterone may determine behavior in competition and conflict 0 0 0 38 2 3 5 21
Bringing together “old” and “new” ways of solving social dilemmas? The case of Spanish Gitanos 0 0 0 59 0 2 9 68
Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection? 0 0 1 23 1 2 11 268
Consistent and inconsistent choices under uncertainty: The role of cognitive abilities 0 0 0 43 1 1 1 150
Creativity and Cognitive Skills among Millennials: Thinking Too Much and Creating Too Little 0 1 1 35 2 3 4 66
Deliberation favors social efficiency by helping people disregard their relative shares: Evidence from US and India 0 0 0 15 0 0 1 38
Deliberation favours social efficiency by making people disregard their relative shares: Evidence from US and India 0 0 0 39 1 2 6 41
Differences in Cognitive Reflection Mediate Gender Differences in Social Preferences 0 0 0 17 3 5 7 38
Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts pro-social behavior in economic games only for unsatisfied individuals 0 0 0 86 1 2 4 125
Economic preferences 2.0: Connecting competition, cooperation and inter-temporal preferences 0 0 0 117 1 1 1 40
Economics students: self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs 0 0 0 63 1 2 3 130
Effects of Religiosity on Social Behaviour: Experimental Evidence From a Representative Sample of Spaniards 0 0 0 21 2 4 4 157
Effects of Religiosity on Social Behaviour: Experimental Evidence from a Representative Sample of Spaniards 0 0 0 141 2 3 7 105
Effects of religiosity on social behaviour: Experimental evidence from a representative sample of Spaniards 0 0 0 23 1 1 1 53
Experimental Subjects are Not Different 0 0 0 137 2 2 4 417
Exposure to economic inequality at the age of 8 enhances prosocial behaviour in adult life 0 0 0 15 2 3 6 30
Exposure to the Covid-19 pandemic and generosity 0 0 0 14 1 1 4 32
Exposure to the Covid-19 pandemic and generosity 0 0 0 26 3 4 8 102
Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 80 2 3 3 137
Fetal testosterone (2D:4D) as predictor of cognitive reflection 0 0 0 8 1 3 6 63
Fetal testosterone (2D:4D) as predictor of cognitive reflection 0 0 0 55 0 0 2 202
Heterogeneous Motives in the Trust Game: A Tale of Two Roles 0 0 0 52 2 2 3 59
Humans’ (incorrect) distrust of reflective decisions 0 1 1 45 1 3 7 78
Humans’ (incorrect) distrust of reflective decisions 0 0 0 119 1 1 2 92
Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence 0 1 1 74 5 7 9 58
Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence 0 0 1 17 2 4 7 59
Preferences or Confounders? Persistent Gender Gap in Competition Across Four Continents 0 0 1 1 1 5 9 9
Short- and Long-run Goals in Ultimatum Bargaining 0 0 0 65 3 4 6 195
The appropriate response of Spanish Gitanos: Short-run orientation beyond current socio-economic status 0 0 1 43 1 2 5 82
The appropriate response of Spanish Gitanos: Short-run orientation beyond current socio-economic status 0 0 0 12 1 3 6 60
The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 15
The cognitive basis of social behavior: cognitive reflection overrides antisocial but not always prosocial motives 0 0 1 147 1 1 8 232
The separate effects of self-estimated and actual alcohol intoxication on risk-taking: A field experiment 0 0 1 65 0 1 6 264
Trustors' Disregard for Trustees Deciding Intuitively or Reflectively: Three Experiments on Time Constraints 0 0 0 23 1 1 2 32
Trustors’ disregard for trustees deciding intuitively or reflectively: three experiments on time constraints 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 15
£1(£5) or Nothing in Dictator Games: Unexpected Differences 26 26 26 26 24 24 24 24
‘Born this Way’? Prenatal Exposure to Testosterone May Determine Behavior in Competition and Conflict 0 0 0 47 1 3 6 205
Total Working Papers 26 29 36 2,046 81 119 218 4,276
2 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Accepting zero in the ultimatum game does not reflect selfish preferences 0 0 0 14 1 2 7 67
Cognitive abilities and risk-taking: Errors, not preferences 0 0 2 22 1 2 14 103
Do Envy and Compassion Pave the Way to Unhappiness? Social Preferences and Life Satisfaction in a Spanish City 0 0 0 12 2 3 4 112
Economics students: Self-selected in preferences and indoctrinated in beliefs 0 0 0 5 0 3 4 19
Organizations should know their people: A behavioral economics approach 0 0 2 37 4 5 12 216
Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: lab, field and online evidence 0 1 2 12 1 6 23 55
Patience predicts cooperative synergy: The roles of ingroup bias and reciprocity 0 0 0 4 2 4 5 32
Religious Pro-Sociality? Experimental Evidence from a Sample of 766 Spaniards 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8
To trust, or not to trust: Cognitive reflection in trust games 0 0 1 26 0 0 3 98
‘Born this Way’? Prenatal exposure to testosterone may determine behavior in competition and conflict 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 18
Total Journal Articles 0 1 7 136 11 25 77 728

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Statistics updated 2025-12-06