| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Natural Resource Theory of U.S. Crop Insurance Contract Choice |
0 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
61 |
| A Recent Trend in Ecological Economic Research: Quantifying the Benefits and Costs of Improving Ecosystem Services |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
78 |
| Allocating Nutrient Load Reduction across a Watershed: Implications of Different Principles |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
66 |
| Alternative Intertemporal Permit Trading Regimes with Stochastic Abatement Costs |
0 |
0 |
2 |
31 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
126 |
| Alternative Intertemporal Permit Trading Regimes with Stochastic Abatement Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
197 |
| An Analysis of Farmers' Insurance Choices and Federal Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
128 |
| Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of the Conservation Reserve Program and its Interaction with Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
42 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: Value and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
175 |
| Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: an Offset Program versus Other Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
114 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
177 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
126 |
| Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
29 |
| Consequences of Co-Benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
121 |
| Consequences of Co-benefits for the Efficient Design of Carbon Sequestration Programs, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
142 |
| Conservation Payments: Challenges in Design and Implementation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
148 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
173 |
| Conservation Reserve Program in the Presence of a Working Land Alternative: Implications for Environmental Quality, Program Participation, and Income Transfer, The |
0 |
0 |
1 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
238 |
| Designation of Co-benefits and Its Implication for Policy: Water Quality versus Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
131 |
| Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Alternative Carbon Accounting, with an Application to the Upper Mississippi River Basin, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
258 |
| Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Measures of Cost-Effectiveness, The |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
216 |
| Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
432 |
| Effects of Crop Insurance Subsidies and Sodsaver on Land Use Change, The |
0 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
63 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement Versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
329 |
| Environmental Conservation in Agriculture: Land Retirement versus Changing Practices on Working Land |
1 |
1 |
1 |
95 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
501 |
| GREEN PAYMENTS AND DUAL POLICY GOALS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
51 |
| Geographic Determinants of Preferences along U.S. Crop Insurance Subsidy Schedule |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
29 |
| Green Payments and Dual Policy Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
144 |
| Green Payments and Dual Policy Goals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
410 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn |
0 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
152 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis Versus System-Wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
117 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
570 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis versus System-wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
192 |
| Greenhouse Gas Impacts of Ethanol from Iowa Corn: Life Cycle Analysis versus System-wide Accounting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
281 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
1 |
39 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
144 |
| Impacts of Ethanol on Planted Acreage in Market Equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
353 |
| Land Resilience and Tail Dependence among Crop Yield Distributions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
43 |
| Land Retirement Program Design and Empirical Assessments In the Presence of Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
67 |
| Land Use Change and Policy in Iowa's Loess Hills |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
34 |
| Land Use Consequences of Crop Insurance Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
1 |
36 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
97 |
| Least Cost Control of Agricultural Nutrient Contributions to the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
85 |
| Least-Cost Tradeable Risk Permit Scheme for Controlling Risk of Introducing Invasive Alien Species by Shipping |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
33 |
| Native Grassland Conversion: the Roles of Risk Intervention and Switching Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
32 |
| Native Grassland Conversion: the Roles of Risk Intervention and Switching Costs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
43 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an Ex Ante Pollution Target |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
118 |
| Optimal Design of Permit Markets with an ex ante Pollution Target |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
123 |
| Perspectives on Addressing Global Climate Change Issues: Case of U.S. And China |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
71 |
| Privatizing Ecosystem Services: Water Quality Effects from a Carbon Market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
59 |
| Production and Abatement Distortions under Noisy Green Taxes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
105 |
| Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets |
0 |
0 |
3 |
61 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
125 |
| Role of Ethanol Plants in Dakotas’ Land Use Change: Analysis Using Remotely Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
51 |
| Role of Ethanol Plants in Dakotas’ Land Use Change: Analysis Using Remotely Sensed Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
139 |
| Searching for Efficiency: Least Cost Nonpoint Source Pollution Control with Multiple Pollutants, Practices, and Targets |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
59 |
| Subsidies! The Other Incentive-Based Instrument: The Case of the Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
198 |
| Tail Dependence is to be Expected Among Crop Yields |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
44 |
| The Allocation of Nutrient Load Reduction Across a Watershed: Assessing Delivery Coefficients As an Implementation Tool |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
246 |
| The Cost of Cleaner Water: Assessing Agricultural Pollution Reduction at the Watershed Scale |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
177 |
| The Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration and Alternative Carbon Accounting, with an Application to the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
104 |
| The Effects of Government Payments on Cropland Acreage, CRP Enrollment, and Grassland Conversion in the Dakotas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
43 |
| The Effects of Government Payments on Native Grassland Conversion, the Crp, and Corn Acreage Changes in the Dakotas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
68 |
| The Provision of Public Goods from Agriculture: Observations from |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
55 |
| Time Path and Implementation of Carbon Sequestration (The) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
150 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
156 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
95 |
| Towards Implementing Carbon Markets in Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
26 |
| Transfers and Environmental Co-Benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
247 |
| Upper Mississippi River Basin Modeling System Part 3: Conservation Practice Scenario Results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
173 |
| When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions Be Penalized in a Trading Program? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
111 |
| When Should Uncertain Nonpoint Emissions be Penalized in a Trading Program? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
60 |
| Willingness to Pay for Surplus Sugar in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
140 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
3 |
17 |
1,754 |
13 |
52 |
382 |
9,774 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.