Access Statistics for Stuart J.H. Graham

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Business Dynamics of Innovating Firms: Linking U.S. Patents with Administrative Data on Workers and Firms 0 0 1 140 2 3 7 457
Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of US and European Patents 0 0 0 228 4 5 11 782
Can Post-Grant Reviews Improve Patent System Design? A Twin Study of US and European Patents 0 0 1 97 5 6 10 379
Comparing Patent Litigation Across Europe: A First Look 0 0 0 57 2 4 10 112
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property and the Platform Paradox 0 0 0 115 4 7 19 356
Distance (Still) Hampers Diffusion of Innovations 0 0 0 13 2 4 10 44
Nanothechnology and the emergence of a general purpose technology 0 0 0 77 1 2 6 84
Pioneers, Submariners, or Thicket-builders: Which Firms Use Continuations in Patenting? 0 0 0 56 1 3 12 200
Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-Examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 8 4 7 10 167
Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 183 3 5 12 906
Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 0 4 7 13 13
Post-Issue Patent "Quality Control": A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 5 1 3 5 113
Post-Issue Patent “Quality Control:” A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 0 2 5 8 153
Post-Issue Patent “Quality Control:” A Comparative Study of US Patent Re-examinations and European Patent Oppositions 0 0 0 0 4 5 10 12
Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition 0 0 1 115 1 3 18 631
Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition 0 0 0 0 2 4 5 11
Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition 0 0 0 6 2 2 10 136
Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition 0 0 0 181 1 3 5 735
Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition 0 0 0 1 0 3 8 107
Secrecy in the Shadow of Patenting: Firms Use of Continuation Patents, 1975-1994 0 0 0 83 0 2 4 251
The Impact of Patenting on New Product Introductions in the Pharmaceutical Industry 0 0 0 120 2 5 11 402
The Problem of Earlier Rights: Evidence from the European Trademark System 1 1 4 26 3 3 19 85
Total Working Papers 1 1 7 1,511 50 91 223 6,136

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? 0 0 0 80 4 5 17 339
Business dynamics of innovating firms: Linking U.S. patents with administrative data on workers and firms 0 1 1 21 2 3 23 102
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property, and Platform Technologies 0 0 1 38 4 5 13 181
Foreword 0 0 0 5 1 2 5 35
Monetizing marks: Insights from the USPTO Trademark Assignment Dataset 0 0 3 18 5 8 16 79
Nanotechnology and the Emergence of a General Purpose Technology 0 1 1 12 2 3 15 97
Of Smart Phone Wars and Software Patents 0 0 1 45 0 4 27 253
Patent transactions in the marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset 2 3 4 34 7 10 23 127
Pioneering Inventors or Thicket Builders: Which U.S. Firms Use Continuations in Patenting? 0 0 1 27 0 1 9 90
Productivity and the role of complementary assets in firms' demand for technology innovations 0 0 0 23 4 7 16 125
Research Note ---The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement on Open Source Software Project Success 0 0 1 5 1 3 11 42
Separating patent wheat from chaff: Would the US benefit from adopting patent post-grant review? 0 0 1 6 4 5 9 63
Submarines in software? continuations in US software patenting in the 1980s and 1990s 0 1 3 102 3 4 18 315
The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A window on patent processing 0 0 2 16 2 7 28 90
The USPTO Trademark Case Files Dataset: Descriptions, Lessons, and Insights 0 0 1 50 9 15 32 185
The USPTO economics research agenda 0 0 0 8 5 14 23 73
Valuable Choices: Prominent Venture Capitalists’ Influence on Startup CEO Replacements 0 1 3 17 5 8 17 81
Venture capital investment strategies under financing constraints: Evidence from the 2008 financial crisis 1 1 6 52 5 12 38 174
Total Journal Articles 3 8 29 559 63 116 340 2,451

Book File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Standards, Patents and Innovations 0 0 0 0 2 4 17 182
Total Books 0 0 0 0 2 4 17 182

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Co-evolution of Intellectual Property Protections and Innovation: The Case of ‘Continuation’ Patents in the United States 0 0 0 11 0 0 2 22
Competing on Standards? Entrepreneurship, Intellectual Property and Platform Technologies 0 0 0 41 0 1 14 150
Prospects for Improving US Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition 0 0 0 32 4 7 25 214
The Determinants of Patentees’ Use of ‘Continuation’ Patent Applications in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 1980–99 0 0 0 11 1 1 6 25
Why Do Entrepreneurs Patent? 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 16
Total Chapters 0 0 0 99 5 9 48 427
1 registered items for which data could not be found
logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-05-06