| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Comment on the Environment and Directed Technical Change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
128 |
2 |
7 |
12 |
405 |
| A Kantian approach to sustainable development indicators for climate change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
96 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
293 |
| Can voluntary product-labeling replace trade bans in the case of GMOs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
249 |
| Carbon capture and storage technologies in the European power market |
0 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
200 |
| Climate Change, Employment and Local Development in London, UK |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
118 |
| Climate Policy without Commitment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
2 |
5 |
8 |
153 |
| Climate Policy without Commitment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
86 |
| Directed Technical Change and the Resource Curse |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
1 |
6 |
10 |
24 |
| Directed technical change and the resource curse |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
6 |
10 |
25 |
| Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
87 |
| Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
56 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
74 |
| Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
23 |
| Does a Renewable Fuel Standard for Biofuels Reduce Climate Costs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
64 |
| Does a renewable fuel standard for biofuels reduce climate costs? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
75 |
| Eco-labels, Production Related Externalities and Trade |
0 |
0 |
0 |
212 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
666 |
| Effects of Global Fisheries on Developing Countries Possibilities for Income and Threat of Depletion |
0 |
2 |
2 |
53 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
267 |
| Effects of Global Fisheries on Developing Countries: Possibilities for Income and Threat of Depletion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
79 |
| Emissions leakage and subsidies for pollution abatement. Pay the polluter or the supplier of the remedy? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
42 |
1 |
7 |
12 |
298 |
| Environmental Economics, Regulation, and Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
61 |
| Environmental Economics, Regulation, and Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
33 |
| Environmental Policy and the Direction of Technical Change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
64 |
| Explaining experience curves for LNG liquefaction costs: Competition matter more than learning |
0 |
1 |
1 |
866 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
2,302 |
| From natural resources and environmental accounting to construction of indicators for sustainable development |
0 |
0 |
1 |
338 |
3 |
4 |
11 |
1,212 |
| Incentives for Environmental R&D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
179 |
| Incentives for environmental R&D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
41 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
92 |
| Industrial Competitiveness and Diffusion of New Pollution Abatement Technology - a new look at the Porter-hypothesis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
231 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
762 |
| Internalizing negative environmental impacts from wind power production. Coasian bargaining, offsetting schemes and environmental taxes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
| Lock-in and the transition to hydrogen cars. When should governments intervene? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
92 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
379 |
| On blending mandates, border tax adjustment and import standards for biofuels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
110 |
| Optimal CO2 abatement and technological change. Should emission taxes start high in order to spur R&D? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
97 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
231 |
| Optimal Environmental Policy with Network Effects: Is Lock-in in Dirty Technologies Possible? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
65 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
77 |
| Optimal Environmental Policy with Network Effects: Will Pigovian Taxation Lead to Excess Inertia? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
59 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
159 |
| Optimal regulatory policies for charging of electric vehicles |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
48 |
| Policies for Second Generation Biofuels: Current status and future challenges |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
139 |
| Promoting Second Generation Biofuels: Does the First Generation Pave the Road? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
71 |
| R&D in natural resource based industries: Governments should prioritize innovation which reduces environmental hazards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
34 |
| Resource Rent in Norwegian Fisheries. Trends and policies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
92 |
| Robust Policies against Emission Leakage: The Case for Upstream Subsidies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
5 |
9 |
13 |
148 |
| Strategic Climate Policy in Small, Open Economies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
48 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
180 |
| Strategic Technology Policy as a Supplement to Renewable Energy Standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
70 |
| Strategic investment in climate friendly technologies: the impact of permit trade |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
142 |
| Strategic technology policy as a supplement to renewable energy standards |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
53 |
| The Fiscal Incentive of GHG Cap and Trade: Permits May Be Too Cheap and Developed Countries May Abate Too Little |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
71 |
| The Resource Rent in Norwegian Aquaculture from 1984 to 2020 – Is the Rent Ripe for Taxation? |
0 |
0 |
3 |
36 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
22 |
| The Transition to Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
50 |
| The fiscal incentive of GHG cap and trade. Permits may be too cheap and developed countries may abate too little |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
61 |
| The resource rent in Norwegian aquaculture 1984-2020. Calculations applying the National Accounts |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
20 |
| Trade and Resources: Welfare effects of the Lake Victoria fisheries boom |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
123 |
| Trade, GMOs, and Environmental Risk: Are Policies Likely to Improve Welfare? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
77 |
| Vehicle-to-Grid. Impacts on the electricity market and consumer cost of electric vehicles |
0 |
0 |
1 |
71 |
3 |
6 |
11 |
164 |
| Total Working Papers |
0 |
3 |
13 |
3,625 |
79 |
158 |
271 |
10,424 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.