| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| 2018 Farm Act Retains Conservation Programs But Could Reduce Payments for Land Retirement |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| A Discrete-Count Model of Recreational Demand |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
181 |
| A Theoretical Foundation for Count Data Models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
34 |
| Barriers to Using Economic Experiments in Evidence‐Based Agricultural Policymaking |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
| Book Review: Multiple Use Management: The Economics of Public Forestland |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
| Calibrating Benefit Function Transfer to Assess the Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
43 |
| Challenges Facing USDA’s Conservation Reserve Program |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
36 |
| Common Organic Practices Include Complex Rotations, Cover Crops, and Pasture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
| Conservation Programs: Balancing Outcomes With a Selection Index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Conservation Reserve Program Acreage To Decline; Will Benefits Also Fall? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
| Conservation Reserve Program Boosts Outdoor Recreation in Rurul Communities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
| Conservation Reserve Program Signup Options Considered |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
| Conservation Trends in Agriculture Reflect Policy, Technology, and Other Factors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
| Conserving Spatially Explicit Benefits in Ecosystem Service Markets: Experimental Tests of Network Bonuses and Spatial Targeting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
73 |
| Declines in Pollinator Forage Suitability Were Concentrated in the Midwest, the Over-Summering Grounds for Many Honeybees |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
| Do Farm Programs Encourage Native Grassland Losses? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
85 |
| Do Government Economists Value AAEA Conferences? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
| Do Government Economists Value AAEA Conferences? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
82 |
| Do Roads Cause Deforestation? Using Satellite Images in Econometric Analysis of Land Use |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
91 |
| ESTIMATING PRODUCER'S SURPLUS WITH THE CENSORED REGRESSION MODEL: AN APPLICATION TO PRODUCERS AFFECTED BY COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN SALMON RECOVERY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
163 |
| Ecosystem services from agriculture: Steps for expanding markets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
146 |
| Estimating Consumer Surplus in the Censored Linear Model |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
47 |
| Farmland Preservation Programs: Another Tool for Managing Urban Growth? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
| Farmland Retirement's Impact on Rural Growth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
| Farmland Retirement’s Impact on Rural Growth |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Fee Hunting May Boost Farm Income, Wildlife Habitat |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
| Gathering Experimental Evidence To Improve the Design of Agricultural Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
| How Does Farmland Retirement Affect Rural Counties |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
| Improving the cost-effectiveness of the Conservation Reserve Program: A laboratory study |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
40 |
| In Recent Years, Most Expiring Land in the Conservation Reserve Program Returned to Crop Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
184 |
| Measuring hazardous waste damages with panel models |
0 |
0 |
0 |
163 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
414 |
| Modeling Discrete Choice with Uncertain Data: An Augmented MNL Estimator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
93 |
| Options for Improving Conservation Programs: Insights From Auction Theory and Economic Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Protecting Rural Amenities Through Farmland Preservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
166 |
| Protecting Rural Amenities Through Farmland Preservation Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
| RURAL AMENITIES:A KEY REASON FOR FARMLAND PROTECTION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
18 |
| Recent Conservation Reserve Program Enrollments Signal Changing Priorities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Rural Amenities: A Key Reason for Farmland Protection |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Symphony of the Soil [documentary]. Directed, produced, and written by Deborah Koons |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
75 |
| The Ecosystem Service Valuation and Federal Conservation Special Issue of ARER |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
| The Effective Use of Limited Information: Do Bid Maximums Reduce Procurement Cost in Asymmetric Auctions? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
| The Effective Use of Limited Information: Do Bid Maximums Reduce Procurement Cost in Asymmetric Auctions? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
134 |
| The Error Structure of Time Series Cross-Section Hedonic Models with Sporadic Event Timing and Serial Correlation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
82 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
355 |
| The Role of Conservation Program Design in Drought-Risk Adaptation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
| The US Conservation Reserve Program: The evolution of an enrollment mechanism |
1 |
3 |
9 |
11 |
4 |
9 |
21 |
43 |
| The Value of the Reservoir Services Gained with Soil Conservation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
82 |
| The error structure of time series cross‐section hedonic models with sporadic event timing and serial correlation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
| The predictive power of risk preference measures for farming decisions -super-† |
0 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
69 |
| Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
25 |
| Using Mixed Logit in Land Use Models: Can Expectation-Maximization (EM) Algorithms Facilitate Estimation? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
92 |
| Welfare Estimation Using Aggregate and Individual-Observation Models: A Comparison Using Monte Carlo Techniques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
17 |
| Total Journal Articles |
1 |
5 |
15 |
720 |
20 |
63 |
144 |
3,188 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.