| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Framed-field experiment on Approval voting and Evaluation voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
31 |
| A new methodology for the history of economic thought |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
| A.K. Sen and J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
13 |
| A.K. Sen et J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
72 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
197 |
| A.K. Sen et J.E. Roemer: une même approche de la responsabilité ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
32 |
| Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
35 |
| Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
59 |
| Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
25 |
| Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
17 |
| Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
58 |
| Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
57 |
| Consumption externality and Pigovian taxation: A comparison between Rawls and Bentham |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
28 |
| Dis moi ce que tu penses de la propriété intellectuelle, je te dirai qui tu es |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
51 |
| Disentangling distributional motives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
104 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
107 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
| Du paradoxe libéral-parétien à un concept de métaclassement des préférences |
0 |
0 |
1 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
358 |
| Experimentation and voting theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
26 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation le 22 avril 2007. Premiers résultats |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
27 |
| Expérimentation du vote par note et du vote par approbation lors de l'élection présidentielle française du 22 avril 2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| Extending Xu's results to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
| Extending Xu's results to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
| Framed-field experiments on approval voting in political contexts. Some teachings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
31 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
47 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
1 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
4 |
5 |
18 |
52 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
60 |
| How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
14 |
| Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
38 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
11 |
| Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
67 |
| Invoking a Cartesian Product Structure on Social States: New Resolutions of Sen's and Gibbard's Impossibility Theorems |
0 |
0 |
1 |
59 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
348 |
| La question de l’Autre en économie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
17 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
23 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
66 |
| La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
27 |
| Le paradoxe libéral-parétien: un second théorème d'impossibilité dû aux effets d'indépendance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
| Le paradoxe libéral-parétien: un second théorème d'impossibilité dû aux « effets d'indépendance » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
30 |
| Liberalism of Freedom Versus Liberalism of Happiness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
| Libéralisme de la liberté versus libéralisme du bonheur - Le cas du paradoxe libéral-parétien |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
22 |
| Measuring Success: Women Leaders in Industry in Nineteenth Century France: The Case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
45 |
| Par-delà le transcendantal et le comparatif. Deux arguments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
24 |
| Political philosophy and economics: freedom and labour |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
89 |
| Rawls and the economists: the (im)possible dialogue |
0 |
0 |
1 |
146 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
260 |
| Rawls with Hegel: The concept of liberalism freedom |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
20 |
| Reconstructing preferences in a voting context |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
31 |
| Review of “Welfare Theory, Public Action, and Ethical Values: Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics” edited by Roger E. Backhouse, Antoinette Baujard and Tamatsu Nishizawa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
36 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
| Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
15 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
61 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
69 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
26 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
49 |
| Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
65 |
| Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
33 |
| The Death of Welfare Economics: History of a Controversy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
144 |
| The Political Supply in the 2007 French Presidential Elections: An Analysis Based on Experimental Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
31 |
| The death of welfare economics: history of a controversy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
31 |
| Transcendental vs. Comparative Approaches to Justice: A Reappraisal of Sen’s Dichotomy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
96 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
272 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
33 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
17 |
| Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
24 |
| Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election |
0 |
1 |
1 |
26 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
51 |
| Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
13 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
1 |
2 |
27 |
192 |
| Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
5 |
6 |
19 |
69 |
| Women Leaders in Industry in Nineteenth Century France: The Case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
1 |
4 |
30 |
120 |
| Women leaders in industry in nineteenth-century France: The case of Amélie de Dietrich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
19 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
2 |
6 |
908 |
22 |
66 |
629 |
4,057 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.