| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| Deterrence, Lawsuits and Litigation Outcomes under Agency Problems and Court Errors |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
410 |
| Effective Labor Relations Laws and Social Welfare |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
80 |
| Exclusionary Vertical Restraints and Antitrust: Experimental Law and Economics Contributions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
239 |
| Exclusive Dealing and Market Foreclosure: Further Experimental Results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
82 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
119 |
| Financially-Constrained Lawyers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
| Financially-Constrained Lawyers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
59 |
| Financially-Constrained Lawyers: An Economic Theory of Legal Disputes |
1 |
1 |
1 |
35 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
72 |
| Incentive Contracts for Teams: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
43 |
| Incentive Contracts for Teams: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
91 |
| Irreconcilable Differences: Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
104 |
| Law and Economics and Tort Litigation Institutions: Theory and Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
90 |
| Naked Exclusion: An Experimental Study of Contracts with Externalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
279 |
| Naked Exclusion: An Experimental Study of Contracts with Externalities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
228 |
| Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
63 |
| Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
47 |
| Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
30 |
| Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
40 |
| Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
37 |
| Ordered Leniency: An Experimental Study of Law Enforcement with Self-Reporting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
| Playing against an Apparent Opponent: Incentives for Care, Litigation, and Damage Caps under Self-Serving Bias |
1 |
1 |
1 |
32 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
141 |
| Playing against an Apparent Opponent: Incentives for Care, Litigation, and Damage Caps under Self-Serving Bias |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
190 |
| Shotgun Mechanisms for Common-Value Partnerships: The Unassigned-Offeror Problem |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
130 |
| Shotguns and Deadlocks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
116 |
| Split-Award Tort Reform and Settlement Outcomes: An Experimental Investigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
304 |
| Split-Award Tort Reform, Firm's Level of Care and Litigation Outcomes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
345 |
| Stipulated Damages as a Rent-Extraction Mechanism: Experimental Evidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
69 |
| Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
166 |
| Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
243 |
| Trigger Happy or Gun Shy? Dissolving Common-Value Partnerships with Texas Shootouts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
525 |
| Total Working Papers |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1,034 |
6 |
17 |
67 |
4,312 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.