Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
21 |
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
16 |
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
"Compter les voix" et optimiser la démocratie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
"Compter les voix" et optimiser la démocratie |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
A Behavioral Learning Process in Games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1,148 |
A Theorem on Symetric Two-Player Zero-Sum Games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
548 |
A behavioral learning process in games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
353 |
A live experiment on approval voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
A live experiment on approval voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
37 |
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
A note on choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
89 |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
A solution to the two-person implementation problem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
Addressing the European Union’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district’s proposal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
Addressing the European Union’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district’s proposal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Aggregation of Preferences with a Variable set of Alternatives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
381 |
Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
108 |
All (electoral) politics is local? Candidate's regional roots and vote choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
All (electoral) politics is local? Candidate's regional roots and vote choice |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
7 |
7 |
Ambiguity in electoral competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
107 |
An incentive-compatible Condorcet jury theorem |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
And the loser is... Plurality Voting |
0 |
0 |
1 |
63 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
150 |
Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
Bargaining through Approval |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
Bargaining through Approval |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Bargaining through Approval |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
35 |
Bargaining through Approval |
0 |
0 |
0 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
66 |
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
51 |
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
Choosing an Electoral Rule |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
44 |
Choosing an Electoral Rule: Values and Self-Interest in the Lab |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
Classical electoral competition under approval voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
Commitee decisions: optimality and equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
108 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
234 |
Committee decisions: Optimality and Equilibrium |
0 |
1 |
2 |
36 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
116 |
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election |
1 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
12 |
Comparison functions and choice correspondences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
123 |
Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
50 |
Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
49 |
Compter les voix et « optimiser » la démocratie ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Compter les voix et « optimiser » la démocratie ? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail |
0 |
0 |
2 |
45 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
165 |
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
26 |
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
15 |
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick |
0 |
0 |
1 |
52 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
35 |
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick |
0 |
0 |
0 |
70 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
88 |
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees. The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
38 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
38 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
1 |
54 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
62 |
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Designing Preference Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
Designing Preference Voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
Distributive politics: does electoral competition promote inequality ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
180 |
Dividing One Euro, Democratically |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
253 |
Dividing one euro democratically |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
140 |
Do Kantians Drive Others to Extinction? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
Do Kantians Drive Others to Extinction? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? |
0 |
0 |
2 |
23 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
30 |
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
17 |
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? |
0 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
Economic analysis of the 12th man: should the fans be paid? |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
Economic analysis of the 12th man: should the fans be paid? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Election présidentielle: Une expérience pour un autre mode de scrutin |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
112 |
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
Euclidean preferences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
216 |
Evolutionary games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
52 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
39 |
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
In Silico Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
103 |
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
Individual Freedom of Choice in a Social Setting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1,393 |
Individual Moral Consistency and Aggregative Collective Choices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
804 |
Individual freedom of choice in a social setting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
664 |
Individual moral consistency and aggregative collective choices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
228 |
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
90 |
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
111 |
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: Evidence from a transcontinental Ultimatum Game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
82 |
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
73 |
K-Players Additive Extensions of Two-player Games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
478 |
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
La "Nouvelle Economie Politique": Analyse Economique du Vote |
0 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
241 |
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
57 |
Le vote par assentiment: une expérience |
0 |
0 |
2 |
29 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
198 |
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
26 |
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
41 |
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
Multivariate Analysis of Comparison Matrices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
407 |
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
106 |
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Opportunist politicians and the evolution ofelectoral competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
109 |
Optimal Apportionment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
47 |
Optimal Apportionment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
123 |
Overstating: A tale of two cities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
39 |
Party Preference Representation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
21 |
Party Preference Representation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Party identification and the existence of a voting equilibrium |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
280 |
Party objectives in the "Divide a dollar" electoral competition |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
96 |
Party preference representation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
Party preference representation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
Pivots et Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Pivots et Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
Pivots et Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
Pivots et Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
Preference Intensity Representation: Strategic Overstating in Large Elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
Profit vs. win maximization in a league: a paradox |
11 |
11 |
14 |
15 |
7 |
7 |
22 |
24 |
Profit vs. win maximization in a league: a paradox |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Reaching Consensus Through Simultaneous Bargaining |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
70 |
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
50 |
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
52 |
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
273 |
Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
73 |
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
Strategic Approval Voting in a large electorate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
99 |
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates |
0 |
0 |
1 |
19 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
15 |
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
33 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
38 |
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
38 |
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich |
0 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate |
0 |
0 |
1 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
84 |
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
92 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
237 |
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
204 |
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study |
0 |
0 |
1 |
81 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
335 |
Stubborn Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
68 |
Stubborn Learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
34 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
57 |
Stubborn learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
Stubborn learning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
The EuroVotePlus experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
17 |
The EuroVotePlus experiment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
The Future of Economic Design |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
28 |
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
31 |
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
The Leader rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
35 |
The Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Electoral Systems: An Appraisal with Experimental Data |
1 |
1 |
2 |
24 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
187 |
The allocation between the EU member states of the seats in the European Parliament Cambridge Compromise |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
92 |
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
The first-mover advantage in penalty shoot-outs: Really? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
23 |
The first-mover advantage in penalty shoot-outs: Really? |
0 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
28 |
To vote or to abstain? An experimental study or first past the poste and PR elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
146 |
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
Universalization and altruism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
22 |
Universalization and altruism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
Universalization and altruism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Universalization and altruism |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
24 |
Vote choice in one round and two round elections |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
104 |
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
28 |
Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election |
0 |
1 |
1 |
25 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
43 |
Voter autrement |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
Voter autrement |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
Voting Experiments |
0 |
2 |
22 |
22 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
10 |
Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
Voting Experiments |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
Voting Under Ignorance of Job Skills of Unemployed: The Overtaxation bias |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
77 |
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? |
0 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
17 |
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
17 |
Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
47 |
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election |
0 |
0 |
2 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
164 |
Why not proportional? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
71 |
Why not proportional? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
Total Working Papers |
16 |
27 |
83 |
2,480 |
78 |
147 |
427 |
15,973 |