Access Statistics for Jean-François Laslier

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 27
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate 0 0 1 11 0 0 18 39
"Co-construction" in Deliberative Democracy: Lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate 0 0 0 2 0 1 12 25
"Compter les voix" et optimiser la démocratie 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
"Compter les voix" et optimiser la démocratie 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
A Behavioral Learning Process in Games 0 0 0 2 1 1 14 1,163
A Theorem on Symetric Two-Player Zero-Sum Games 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 554
A behavioral learning process in games 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 362
A live experiment on approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 50
A live experiment on approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 17
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 33
A note on choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation 0 0 0 33 0 0 4 65
A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 26
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 0 0 1 37 0 1 12 102
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 0 0 0 17 1 1 8 22
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 0 0 1 1 0 1 10 14
Aggregation of Preferences with a Variable set of Alternatives 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 386
Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 118
All (electoral) politics is local? Candidate's regional roots and vote choice 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8
All (electoral) politics is local? Candidate's regional roots and vote choice 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? 0 0 0 1 0 1 7 8
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? 0 0 0 2 0 1 15 23
Ambiguity in electoral competition 0 0 0 27 0 0 12 119
An incentive-compatible Condorcet jury theorem 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 9
And the loser is... Plurality Voting 0 0 1 64 0 0 12 167
Approval Voting, Evaluation Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 18
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 20 0 3 11 23
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 45 0 0 18 85
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 0 1 2 13 21
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 12 0 0 11 46
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 8 1 2 8 61
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 35
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 12
Choosing an Electoral Rule 0 0 0 27 1 2 6 50
Choosing an Electoral Rule: Values and Self-Interest in the Lab 0 0 0 4 0 0 10 16
Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 12
Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17
Classical electoral competition under approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 30
Commitee decisions: optimality and equilibrium 0 0 0 108 1 1 10 245
Committee decisions: Optimality and Equilibrium 0 0 0 36 0 1 11 128
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election 0 0 0 16 0 0 13 25
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election 0 0 0 3 0 2 15 19
Comparison functions and choice correspondences 0 0 0 0 2 2 17 141
Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-­Étienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 14 0 0 8 58
Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 15 0 1 9 58
Compter les voix et « optimiser » la démocratie ? 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 7
Compter les voix et « optimiser » la démocratie ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 0 0 3 48 0 0 17 185
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 0 0 0 8 0 0 11 38
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 19
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick 0 0 0 70 0 0 11 104
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick 0 0 2 54 0 2 13 52
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 1 4 18 29
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 24
Democracy for Polarized Committees. The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 3 0 1 11 51
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 12 0 1 11 22
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 3 0 2 27 67
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 38 0 2 15 44
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 0 2 2 12 34
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 54 0 1 17 79
Designing Preference Voting 0 0 0 11 0 0 5 27
Designing Preference Voting 0 0 0 23 0 0 4 21
Distributive politics: does electoral competition promote inequality ? 0 0 1 25 0 0 21 202
Dividing One Euro, Democratically 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 258
Dividing one euro democratically 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 146
Do Kantians Drive Others to Extinction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10
Do Kantians Drive Others to Extinction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 9
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? 0 0 0 19 0 0 5 37
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 13
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 17
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? 0 0 0 23 0 0 17 50
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? 0 0 0 7 0 0 24 43
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? 0 0 0 15 0 1 15 43
Does universalization ethics justify participation in large elections? 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 21
Economic analysis of the 12th man: should the fans be paid? 0 0 1 2 0 1 11 18
Economic analysis of the 12th man: should the fans be paid? 0 0 1 1 0 5 10 12
Election présidentielle: Une expérience pour un autre mode de scrutin 0 0 0 17 0 0 7 119
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 2 26 0 0 15 70
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 25
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 1 1 1 23 1 2 7 18
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 15
Euclidean preferences 0 0 0 54 0 1 12 228
Evolutionary games 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22
Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness 0 0 1 5 0 0 11 26
Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 28
Gouverner. Un enjeu essentiel 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 22
Gouverner. Un enjeu essentiel 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 18
Gouverner. Un enjeu essentiel 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 30
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior 0 0 0 19 0 1 15 67
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior 0 0 0 24 0 2 10 23
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 20
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 2 2 22 1 3 12 34
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 0 4 0 0 9 29
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 0 11 2 2 12 17
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 1 6 0 0 12 15
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 0 12 0 3 12 37
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 0 2 0 1 5 23
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 47
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 6 14 20
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 16 0 0 9 60
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 1 1 22 0 5 19 53
Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 38
In Silico Voting Experiments 0 0 0 44 1 1 10 113
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 12
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 67
Individual Freedom of Choice in a Social Setting 0 0 0 2 0 0 7 1,400
Individual Moral Consistency and Aggregative Collective Choices 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 812
Individual freedom of choice in a social setting 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 673
Individual moral consistency and aggregative collective choices 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 240
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game 1 1 1 45 1 1 6 117
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 24 0 1 6 96
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 18
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: Evidence from a transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 9 1 1 7 89
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game 0 0 0 4 1 2 16 90
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 14
K-Players Additive Extensions of Two-player Games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 488
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 43
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 21
La "Nouvelle Economie Politique": Analyse Economique du Vote 0 0 0 85 0 1 8 249
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 1 1 1 9 28
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 4 1 2 10 67
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 1 2 13 24
Le vote par assentiment: une expérience 0 0 0 30 0 1 10 209
Les opinions des conventionnels sur les mesures climatiques 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Les opinions des conventionnels sur les mesures climatiques 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 22
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 11
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 10
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 31
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 41
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World 0 0 0 0 2 4 59 102
Multivariate Analysis of Comparison Matrices 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 410
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 22
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 14
One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 11
One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 22 0 1 13 119
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 29
Opportunist politicians and the evolution ofelectoral competition 0 0 0 26 1 1 19 130
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 59
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 0 39 0 1 10 133
Overstating: A tale of two cities 0 0 0 3 0 1 8 49
Party Preference Representation 0 0 0 2 0 0 16 28
Party Preference Representation 0 0 1 6 1 2 11 35
Party identification and the existence of a voting equilibrium 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 287
Party objectives in the "Divide a dollar" electoral competition 0 0 0 19 0 1 8 104
Party preference representation 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12
Party preference representation 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 12
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 10
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 29
Preference Intensity Representation: Strategic Overstating in Large Elections 0 0 0 6 1 1 9 61
Profit Versus Win Maximization in a League: A Paradox 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 10
Profit Versus Win Maximization in a League: A Paradox 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10
Profit vs. win maximization in a league: a paradox 0 0 3 28 0 2 34 87
Profit vs. win maximization in a league: a paradox 0 0 4 6 0 0 15 20
Reaching Consensus Through Simultaneous Bargaining 0 0 0 36 0 1 16 87
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 32
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 16
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 10
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 24
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 28
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 12 1 1 10 62
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 27 0 0 8 26
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 27 0 2 17 70
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 50
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13
Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study 0 0 0 47 0 0 9 283
Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 19 0 0 14 88
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 17 0 0 13 86
Strategic Approval Voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 15 1 1 14 117
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates 0 0 1 20 0 0 15 46
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates 0 0 0 17 0 1 9 25
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 22
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 29
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory 0 0 0 12 1 1 13 52
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory 0 0 0 33 0 0 13 17
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 14 0 0 10 49
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 18 0 0 8 10
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 25 0 0 9 96
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 92 0 1 7 246
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 18
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 32
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 81 0 2 11 346
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 41 1 2 16 222
Stubborn Learning 0 0 0 6 0 1 6 76
Stubborn Learning 0 0 0 34 0 1 8 65
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 19
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 22
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? 0 1 1 3 0 2 11 25
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 32
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 27
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 15
The Future of Economic Design 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 40
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 40
The Leader rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 0 1 3 10 47
The Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Electoral Systems: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 25 2 2 13 201
The allocation between the EU member states of the seats in the European Parliament Cambridge Compromise 0 0 0 20 0 0 13 108
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 25
The first-mover advantage in penalty shoot-outs: Really? 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 33
The first-mover advantage in penalty shoot-outs: Really? 0 0 0 13 0 0 6 35
To vote or to abstain? An experimental study or first past the poste and PR elections 0 0 0 32 0 0 7 154
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 16
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 49
Universalization and altruism 0 0 0 13 0 0 7 31
Universalization and altruism 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 8
Universalization and altruism 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 8
Universalization and altruism 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 32
Vote choice in one round and two round elections 0 0 0 35 0 0 12 117
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 1 8 18 25
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 33
Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 24
Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election 0 0 1 26 0 0 7 51
Voter autrement 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13
Voter autrement 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 17
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 35
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 17
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 18
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 1 8 8
Voting Experiments 0 0 2 27 0 1 26 39
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 1 1 43 43
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 34
Voting Under Ignorance of Job Skills of Unemployed: The Overtaxation bias 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 81
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? 0 0 0 2 2 2 11 43
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? 0 0 2 9 0 1 10 31
Who Are the Citizens of the French Convention for Climate? 0 0 0 8 0 1 16 59
Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 14
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 23 0 7 20 71
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 28 1 3 29 194
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 23 0 1 3 75
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 36
Total Working Papers 2 6 36 2,536 47 194 2,369 18,612
37 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
10. Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 8
A Behavioral Learning Process in Games 0 0 0 111 0 0 9 353
A Theorem on Symmetric Two-Player Zero-Sum Games 0 0 0 78 0 0 3 212
A live experiment on approval voting 0 1 1 49 0 2 22 165
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 44
A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games 0 0 0 52 0 1 9 179
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 0 0 0 7 1 1 10 36
Addressing Europe’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district proposal 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 33
Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives 0 0 1 50 0 0 8 393
Alternatives to plurality rule for single-winner elections: When do they make a difference? 0 1 3 5 1 3 15 26
Ambiguity in Electoral Competition 0 0 0 30 0 0 16 145
An Incentive‐Compatible Condorcet Jury Theorem 0 0 0 6 0 1 11 59
Analysing a preference and approval profile 0 0 1 16 1 1 7 74
Approval voting: three examples 0 0 0 54 1 1 17 289
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 4 0 1 13 71
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 4 0 2 15 45
Choosing an electoral rule: Values and self-interest in the lab 0 0 1 4 0 2 14 29
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 4 0 1 11 60
Comparing voting methods: 2016 US presidential election 0 1 2 10 0 4 21 63
Comparison functions and choice correspondences 0 0 1 58 1 2 21 339
Composition-consistent tournament solutions and social choice functions 0 0 0 34 0 1 10 129
Condorcet choice correspondences: A set-theoretical comparison 0 0 0 34 0 0 8 92
Condorcet choice correspondences: A set-theoretical comparison 0 0 0 24 0 0 6 93
Consistency between tastes and values: A universalization approach 0 0 0 46 0 3 12 701
Correction: “Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate 0 0 0 3 1 3 14 22
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 1 24 2 7 22 159
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 1 5 0 0 10 48
Distributive Politics and Electoral Competition 0 1 3 186 1 3 31 390
Editorial 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 41
Electoral competition under imperfect information 0 0 0 54 0 1 9 150
Euclidean preferences 0 0 1 160 1 2 15 532
Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness 0 1 3 10 5 8 34 74
Heuristic Voting Under the Alternative Vote: The Efficiency of “Sour Grapes” Behavior 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 52
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 1 8 0 0 13 68
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game 0 0 0 6 0 2 8 59
Interpretation of electoral mixed strategies 0 0 0 50 0 1 10 313
K–Player Additive Extension of Two-Player games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game 0 0 0 9 0 0 5 51
L'auto-organisation et le marché 0 0 0 2 1 1 11 44
La norme majoritaire 0 0 0 2 0 1 6 79
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 1 0 1 19 52
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 1 1 5 0 2 13 33
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods 0 0 0 1 0 1 17 32
On choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 63
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 1 1 2 5 1 4 25 79
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 2 52 0 2 11 368
Pivots et élections 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 36
Preference intensity representation: strategic overstating in large elections 0 0 0 7 0 2 15 75
Rank-based choice correspondences 0 0 0 12 0 1 8 72
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 31
Réinventer la démocratie française: le grand débat des modes de scrutin 0 0 0 1 2 2 4 5
Social-Choice Mediators 0 0 0 44 0 2 8 191
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 2 0 1 13 35
Spatial Approval Voting 0 1 2 6 0 1 15 30
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 1 7 0 1 24 63
Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study 1 2 2 32 1 2 19 146
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 5 0 2 14 57
The Bipartisan Set of a Tournament Game 0 0 6 203 1 4 19 466
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 37
The Leader Rule 0 0 0 5 0 1 10 39
Two Person Bargaining Mechanisms: A Laboratory Experiment 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 28
Universalization and altruism 0 0 0 4 0 1 10 28
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une expérimentation lors de l'élection présidentielle du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 9 1 2 11 71
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d'Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 2 0 0 14 62
Voting under ignorance of job skills of unemployed: the overtaxation bias 0 0 0 33 0 0 8 164
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 12 0 1 8 65
“Co-construction” in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens’ Convention for Climate 0 0 3 6 1 2 20 40
Total Journal Articles 2 10 39 1,679 24 92 835 8,088

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
And the Loser Is… Plurality Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 27
Classical Electoral Competition Under Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 5
Describing Society Through Approval Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8
In Silico Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 16
Introduction to the Handbook on Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 17
Laboratory Experiments on Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 16
Lessons from In Situ Experiments during French Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10
Party Objectives in the “Divide a Dollar” Electoral Competition 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 10
The Basic Approval Voting Game 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 14
Total Chapters 0 0 0 0 1 3 67 123

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-10-11