Access Statistics for Jean-François Laslier

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Behavioral Learning Process in Games 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1,146
A Theorem on Symetric Two-Player Zero-Sum Games 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 542
A behavioral learning process in games 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 348
A live experiment on approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 27
A live experiment on approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
A note on choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation 0 0 0 32 0 0 2 59
A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 0 1 6 33 0 3 22 66
A solution to the two-person implementation problem 1 1 2 17 1 2 10 10
Addressing the European Union’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district’s proposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17
Addressing the European Union’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district’s proposal 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Aggregation of Preferences with a Variable set of Alternatives 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 376
Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 106
Ambiguity in electoral competition 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 103
And the loser is... Plurality Voting 0 0 0 55 0 3 13 123
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 20
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 20 1 1 2 6
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 45 2 2 6 56
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 12 2 3 3 29
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bargaining through Approval 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 6
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 6 1 2 3 34
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 7 1 2 5 42
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2
Choosing an Electoral Rule 1 1 21 21 3 3 21 21
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 18
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 7
Classical electoral competition under approval voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16
Commitee decisions: optimality and equilibrium 0 0 1 108 0 2 5 227
Committee decisions: Optimality and Equilibrium 0 0 0 33 0 0 4 90
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election 0 0 1 22 0 0 6 13
Comparing Voting Methods: 2016 US Presidential Election 1 1 2 13 1 2 12 37
Comparison functions and choice correspondences 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 120
Compte-rendu de l'expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-­Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 14 1 1 2 49
Compte-rendu de l’expérimentation des votes par approbation et par note lors des élections présidentielles françaises le 22 avril 2012 à Saint-Etienne, Strasbourg et Louvigny 0 0 0 15 0 0 5 47
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 4 8 28 28 12 34 91 91
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 0 0 2 2 0 0 5 5
Convention Citoyenne pour le Climat: Les citoyens de la Convention comparés à des échantillons représentatifs de la population française. Note de travail 0 1 3 3 3 4 10 10
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick 0 0 2 69 3 12 24 77
Decision Under Psychological Pressure: The Shooter's Anxiety at the Penalty Kick 0 0 0 48 1 1 6 14
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 3 4 6 6
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 1 3 8 8
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 0 0 2 3 7 25
Deliberating on Climate Action: Insights from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate 13 47 47 47 36 120 120 120
Democracy for Polarized Committees. The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 32
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 12 2 2 5 6
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 30
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 15
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 52 1 1 5 47
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 0 38 0 0 2 25
Designing Preference Voting 0 22 22 22 2 3 3 3
Designing Preference Voting 0 1 8 8 2 3 5 5
Distributive politics: does electoral competition promote inequality ? 0 0 1 23 0 0 5 177
Dividing One Euro, Democratically 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 244
Dividing one euro democratically 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 133
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? 0 0 19 19 1 10 27 27
Do Kantians drive others to extinction? 0 0 2 2 0 1 6 6
Election présidentielle: Une expérience pour un autre mode de scrutin 0 0 1 15 0 1 3 105
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 22 0 0 2 3
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Electoral System and Number of Candidates: Candidate Entry under Plurality and Majority Runoff 0 0 0 22 0 1 3 43
Euclidean preferences 0 0 0 54 5 5 7 211
Evolutionary games 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existe-t-il un avantage à commencer la séance de tirs au but au football ? 0 4 5 5 0 4 8 8
Existe-t-il un avantage à commencer la séance de tirs au but au football ? 0 1 6 6 3 6 6 6
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Experiments on the Reaction of Citizens to New Voting Rules: A Survey 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 19
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of `sour grapes’ behavior 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 23
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior 0 0 0 24 0 1 1 1
Heuristic voting under the Alternative Vote: the efficiency of “sour grapes" behavior 0 0 0 19 0 0 3 14
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 1 6 6 6 1 8 8 8
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 0 19 19 19 6 11 11 11
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 4 6 6 6 3 6 6 6
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 1 13 13 13 3 16 16 16
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: a new theory of voter turnout 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 3 11 11 0 8 12 12
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 1 2 2 0 5 9 9
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 20 20 1 4 17 17
Homo moralis goes to the voting booth: coordination and information aggregation 0 0 0 0 1 5 7 7
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 14 0 0 5 43
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 35
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 1 2 20 0 1 8 27
Impact du mode de scrutin sur les résultats de l'élection présidentielle de 2012 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 29
In Silico Voting Experiments 0 0 0 44 0 0 5 98
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Individual Behavior under Evaluative Voting. A comparison between laboratory and In Situ experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 57
Individual Freedom of Choice in a Social Setting 0 0 0 2 0 0 6 1,383
Individual Moral Consistency and Aggregative Collective Choices 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 802
Individual freedom of choice in a social setting 0 0 0 0 3 4 8 658
Individual moral consistency and aggregative collective choices 0 0 0 0 1 2 5 220
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 44 0 2 4 107
Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility in Bargaining: Evidence from a Transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 24 0 1 2 86
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: Evidence from a transcontinental Ultimatum Game 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 75
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 60
K-Players Additive Extensions of Two-player Games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 474
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » 0 0 2 5 0 0 3 7
L'étrange « Jugement Majoritaire » 0 0 0 8 1 1 11 37
La "Nouvelle Economie Politique": Analyse Economique du Vote 0 0 0 84 0 1 2 236
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 17
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 13
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 2 0 1 7 41
Le vote par assentiment: une expérience 0 0 0 26 0 0 1 187
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Measuring Perceptions of Candidate Viability in Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 22
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World 0 0 0 0 2 2 6 6
Messi, Ronaldo, and the Politics of Celebrity Elections: Voting for the Best Soccer Player in the World 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 23
Multivariate Analysis of Comparison Matrices 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 401
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8
Multiwinner approval rules as apportionment methods 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 8
One Round versus Two Round Elections: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 22 0 1 2 96
One-round vs. Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
One-round vs. Two-round Elections: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 20
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 20
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 28
Opportunist politicians and the evolution ofelectoral competition 0 0 0 26 0 0 1 105
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 40
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 0 38 0 0 5 111
Overstating: A tale of two cities 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 33
Party Preference Representation 0 1 3 3 0 1 5 5
Party Preference Representation 0 1 2 2 0 1 4 4
Party identification and the existence of a voting equilibrium 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 276
Party objectives in the "Divide a dollar" electoral competition 0 0 0 18 1 1 2 90
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6
Pivots et Elections 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 20
Preference Intensity Representation: Strategic Overstating in Large Elections 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 52
Reaching Consensus Through Simultaneous Bargaining 0 0 2 29 0 0 3 57
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3
Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives are enough, two are not 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 10
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10
Sincere Voting, Strategic Voting A Laboratory Experiment Using Alternative Proportional Systems 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 5
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 1 2 25 0 1 5 8
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 11 1 4 14 32
Sincere voting, strategic voting A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 1 27 0 1 12 32
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 41
Sincere voting, strategic voting: A laboratory experiment using alternative proportional systems 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 4
Sincere, strategic, and heuristic voting under four election rules: An experimental study 0 0 0 47 0 0 1 272
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 19 1 1 3 72
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 17 0 0 1 69
Strategic Approval Voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 15 0 0 4 91
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates 0 0 0 27 0 0 2 23
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 3
Strategic Voting in Multi-Winner Elections with Approval Balloting: A Theory for Large Electorates 1 1 2 16 1 2 7 18
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 5
Strategic Voting in Multiwinner Elections with Approval Balloting: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 17
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 1
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: A Theory 0 0 1 11 0 0 4 29
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 30
Strategic Voting under Committee Approval: An Application to the 2011 Regional Government Election in Zurich 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 1 22 0 1 7 76
Strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 1 91 0 1 10 230
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 15
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 80 0 0 4 325
Strategic, Sincere and Heuristic Voting under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study 0 0 0 39 0 1 1 197
Stubborn Learning 0 0 1 6 1 2 6 48
Stubborn Learning 0 0 1 33 1 1 4 31
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 6
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 24
The 2017 French presidential election: Were voters happy with their first-round vote? 0 1 1 1 1 2 3 3
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
The EuroVotePlus experiment 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 13
The Future of Economic Design 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 14
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
The Future of Economic Design: The Continuing Development of a Field as Envisioned by Its Researchers 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 7
The Leader rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 27
The Mechanical and Psychological Effects of Electoral Systems: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 21 1 1 4 179
The allocation between the EU member states of the seats in the European Parliament Cambridge Compromise 0 0 3 18 0 1 13 78
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
The consequences of internationalization on research topics in economics 0 0 1 1 0 0 5 19
To vote or to abstain? An experimental study or first past the poste and PR elections 0 0 0 31 2 2 8 129
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 3
To vote or to abstain? An experimental test of rational calculus in first past the post and PR elections 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 43
Vote choice in one round and two round elections 1 1 1 34 2 3 7 95
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d’Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 24
Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation in situ lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
Vote par approbation, vote par note: Une expérimentation lors des élections présidentielles du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8
Voter Autrement 2017 for the French Presidential Election 1 2 4 14 1 2 8 18
Voter autrement 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Voter autrement 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 4
Votes for Women: Electoral Systems and Support for Female Candidates 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 24
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 15
Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Voting Under Ignorance of Job Skills of Unemployed: The Overtaxation bias 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 75
Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 28 0 0 5 97
Who's favored by Evaluative Voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 29
Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 48
Who's favored by evaluative voting? An experiment conducted during the 2012 French presidential election 0 0 0 17 0 0 3 24
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 1 25 1 2 11 153
Who’s Favored by Evaluative Voting ? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election 0 0 0 23 0 1 7 41
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 26
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 23 0 0 4 56
Total Working Papers 29 145 288 2,355 140 410 1,165 14,739
2 registered items for which data could not be found

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
10. Systèmes électoraux, qualité de la représentation: qu’apporte la science économique à la science politique ? 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
A Behavioral Learning Process in Games 0 0 0 111 0 1 2 336
A Theorem on Symmetric Two-Player Zero-Sum Games 1 1 1 71 1 1 3 192
A live experiment on approval voting 0 1 1 44 0 2 3 122
A mixed-utility theory of vote choice regret 0 1 1 3 0 2 5 26
A reinforcement learning process in extensive form games 0 0 0 52 1 1 2 168
Addressing Europe’s democratic deficit: An experimental evaluation of the pan-European district proposal 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 15
Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives 0 0 0 48 0 0 3 381
Ambiguity in Electoral Competition 1 1 1 30 1 2 6 122
An Incentive-Compatible Condorcet Jury Theorem 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 38
Analysing a preference and approval profile 0 0 0 14 1 1 2 65
Approval voting: three examples 0 0 0 53 0 0 2 262
Bargaining through Approval 0 1 1 2 0 3 6 45
Ce que le vote par approbation révèle des préférences des électeurs français 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 23
Citizens’ preferences about voting rules: self-interest, ideology, and sincerity 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 36
Comparison functions and choice correspondences 0 0 0 56 0 0 1 309
Composition-consistent tournament solutions and social choice functions 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 112
Condorcet choice correspondences: A set-theoretical comparison 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 79
Condorcet choice correspondences: A set-theoretical comparison 0 0 0 32 0 0 1 74
Consistency between tastes and values: A universalization approach 0 0 0 45 0 0 3 681
Decision under psychological pressure: The shooter's anxiety at the penalty kick 0 0 2 10 6 13 30 68
Democracy for Polarized Committees: The Tale of Blotto's Lieutenants 0 0 1 4 0 0 6 26
Distributive Politics and Electoral Competition 0 5 12 149 0 5 17 307
Editorial 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 39
Electoral competition under imperfect information 0 0 0 51 0 1 2 132
Euclidean preferences 0 0 6 152 0 2 14 498
Heuristic Voting Under the Alternative Vote: The Efficiency of “Sour Grapes” Behavior 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 35
How voters use grade scales in evaluative voting 0 0 0 3 2 2 8 36
Interpersonal comparisons of utility in bargaining: evidence from a transcontinental ultimatum game 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 46
Interpretation of electoral mixed strategies 0 0 0 47 0 1 3 292
K–Player Additive Extension of Two-Player games with an Application to the Borda Electoral Competition Game 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 40
L'auto-organisation et le marché 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 29
La norme majoritaire 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 67
La question du vote. Expérimentations en laboratoire et In Situ 0 0 0 1 0 2 9 24
L’étrange « jugement majoritaire » 0 0 0 2 1 2 5 9
On choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation 0 0 1 3 1 2 3 50
Opportunist politicians and the evolution of electoral competition 0 1 1 2 1 2 5 44
Optimal Apportionment 0 0 0 42 1 2 14 318
Pivots et élections 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21
Preference intensity representation: strategic overstating in large elections 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 48
Rank-based choice correspondences 0 0 1 12 0 1 2 55
Reaching consensus through approval bargaining 0 0 1 2 0 0 5 21
Social-Choice Mediators 0 0 1 39 0 0 3 174
Sorting Out Mechanical and Psychological Effects in Candidate Elections: An Appraisal with Experimental Data 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 13
Spatial Approval Voting 0 0 0 1 0 4 6 10
Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates 0 0 3 4 0 2 5 29
Strategic, sincere, and heuristic voting under four election rules: an experimental study 0 0 1 26 1 2 8 106
Stubborn learning 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 28
The Bipartisan Set of a Tournament Game 2 3 10 165 3 8 21 379
The Leader Rule 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 23
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une expérimentation lors de l'élection présidentielle du 22 avril 2012 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 50
Vote par approbation, vote par note. Une réponse au commentaire d'Allisson et Brisset 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 44
Voting under ignorance of job skills of unemployed: the overtaxation bias 0 0 0 30 0 1 4 150
Why not proportional? 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 48
Total Journal Articles 4 14 46 1,433 20 72 262 6,346

Chapter File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
And the Loser Is… Plurality Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Classical Electoral Competition Under Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Describing Society Through Approval Data 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In Silico Voting Experiments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Introduction to the Handbook on Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laboratory Experiments on Approval Voting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lessons from In Situ Experiments during French Elections 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Party Objectives in the “Divide a Dollar” Electoral Competition 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The Basic Approval Voting Game 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Chapters 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Statistics updated 2021-05-05