| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A bird's-eye view of scientific trading: Dependency relations among fields of science |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
71 |
| A comment to the paper by Waltman et al., Scientometrics, 87, 467–481, 2011 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
| A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
17 |
| A comparative study on communication structures of Chinese journals in the social sciences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
32 |
| A comparison between the China Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations Database and the Science Citation Index in terms of journal hierarchies and interjournal citation relations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
15 |
| A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
24 |
| A discussion of measuring the top-1% most-highly cited publications: quality and impact of Chinese papers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
5 |
33 |
51 |
| A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
2 |
5 |
21 |
72 |
| A heuristic approach based on Leiden rankings to identify outliers: evidence from Italian universities in the European landscape |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
18 |
| A magyar gazdaság tudásalapú szerveződésének mérése. Az innovációs rendszerek szinergiáinak térbelisége |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
3 |
20 |
96 |
| A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
67 |
| A rejoinder on energy versus impact indicators |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| A reply to Etzkowitz’ comments to Leydesdorff and Martin (2010): technology transfer and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
| A review of theory and practice in scientometrics |
0 |
0 |
5 |
53 |
1 |
6 |
43 |
317 |
| A routine for measuring synergy in university–industry–government relations: mutual information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix indicator |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
5 |
24 |
64 |
| A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations and the decomposition of the redundancy |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
31 |
| A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
149 |
| AN ECO-SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTING ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY MEASURES: ENDOGENIZATION OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL DIMENSION USING LOTKA–VOLTERRA EQUATIONS |
0 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
101 |
| Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
31 |
| Accounting for the uncertainty in the evaluation of percentile ranks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
| Aggregated journal–journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
56 |
| Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
23 |
| An Integrated Impact Indicator: A new definition of 'Impact' with policy relevance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
31 |
| An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
27 |
| An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
20 |
| Anticipatory Systems and the Processing of Meaning: a Simulation Study Inspired by Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems |
0 |
0 |
2 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
222 |
| Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
25 |
| Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio‐semantic networks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
28 |
| BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
45 |
| Beer's Viable System Model and Luhmann's Communication Theory: ‘Organizations’ from the Perspective of Meta‐Games |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
48 |
| Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? (A rejoinder) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
15 |
| Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
45 |
| Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
95 |
| Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
56 |
73 |
| Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject Headings of PubMed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
31 |
| Bibliometric perspectives on medical innovation using the medical subject Headings of PubMed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
40 |
| Can intellectual processes in the sciences also be simulated? The anticipation and visualization of possible future states |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
18 |
| Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal‐journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
17 |
| Can technology life-cycles be indicated by diversity in patent classifications? The crucial role of variety |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
37 |
| Can ‘the public’ be considered as a fourth helix in university-industry-government relations? Report on the Fourth Triple Helix Conference, 2002 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
48 |
2 |
6 |
14 |
135 |
| Can “hot spots” in the sciences be mapped using the dynamics of aggregated journal–journal citation Relations? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
11 |
| Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
43 |
| Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
11 |
23 |
| Challenges for regional innovation policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Spatial concentration and foreign control of US patenting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
55 |
| Citation algorithms for identifying research milestones driving biomedical innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
39 |
| Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge: A new routine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
63 |
| Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge: A new routine |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
48 |
| Cited references and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) as two different knowledge representations: clustering and mappings at the paper level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
42 |
| Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
| Co-word maps and topic modeling: A comparison using small and medium-sized corpora (N > 1,000) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
51 |
| Construction of a pragmatic base line for journal classifications and maps based on aggregated journal-journal citation relations |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
39 |
| Content‐based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| Correction: Past performance, peer review, and project selection. Research Evaluation 18 (2009) Peter Van den Besselaar, Loet Leydesdorff |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
20 |
| Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
68 |
| Co‐occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
21 |
| Co‐word analysis using the Chinese character set |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
8 |
| Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging “big data” research |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
96 |
| Decomposing the Triple-Helix synergy into the regional innovation systems of Norway: firm data and patent networks |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
70 |
| Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports methods and their effect on citation measures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
17 |
| Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
39 |
78 |
| Disclosure of university research to third parties: A non-market perspective on an Italian university |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
36 |
| Discontinuities in citation relations among journals: self-organized criticality as a model of scientific revolutions and change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
30 |
| Disruption indices and their calculation using web-of-science data: Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
43 |
| Diversity and interdisciplinarity: how can one distinguish and recombine disparity, variety, and balance? |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
23 |
57 |
| Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
73 |
| Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
31 |
| Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
| Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
18 |
| Eco-system mapping of techno-science linkages at the level of scholarly journals and fields |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
26 |
| Economic and technological complexity: A model study of indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
5 |
39 |
148 |
| El nuevo régimen de comunicación en las relaciones universidad-empresa-gobierno: una triple hélice de innovaciones |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
27 |
| Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations |
2 |
4 |
12 |
162 |
3 |
20 |
57 |
467 |
| Empirical evidence of self‐organization? A rejoinder |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
| Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design as a Journal: The Interdisciplinarity of its Environment and the Citation Impact |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
251 |
| Field-normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
14 |
43 |
| Field‐normalized impact factors (IFs): A comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
30 |
41 |
| Fractional counting of citations in research evaluation: A cross- and interdisciplinary assessment of the Tsinghua University in Beijing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
18 |
49 |
| Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
30 |
| Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
57 |
| Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) of citations in scholarly literature: Dynamic qualities of “transient” and “sticky knowledge claims” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
16 |
86 |
| Growth of international collaboration in science: revisiting six specialties |
0 |
1 |
9 |
50 |
3 |
13 |
53 |
197 |
| Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea |
1 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
53 |
| Heterogeneity in an undirected network: Definition and measurement |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
44 |
| Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS): Authors, institutions, and network structures |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
41 |
| Historical roots of Judit Bar-Ilan’s research: a cited-references analysis using CRExplorer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
16 |
| How are new citation‐based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
20 |
| How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
33 |
| How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
28 |
| How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
25 |
| How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
23 |
| How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
18 |
36 |
| How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management |
0 |
0 |
5 |
41 |
5 |
12 |
46 |
303 |
| How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
23 |
| How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
| How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
57 |
| How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
20 |
41 |
| Identification of long-term concept-symbols among citations: Do common intellectual histories structure citation behavior? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
13 |
| Identifying research fields within business and management: a journal cross-citation analysis |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
28 |
| Improved clusterings and visualizations of 11,359 journals in the JCRs 2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
15 |
| In search of a network theory of innovations: Relations, positions, and perspectives |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
37 |
| Indicators of structural change in the dynamics of science: Entropy statistics of the SCI Journal Citation Reports |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
23 |
| Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations |
0 |
2 |
3 |
17 |
3 |
8 |
31 |
92 |
| Information metrics (iMetrics): a research specialty with a socio-cognitive identity? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
52 |
| Innovation and the Triple Helix |
1 |
3 |
13 |
13 |
8 |
16 |
69 |
69 |
| Innovation systems in México: A matter of missing synergies |
0 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
70 |
| Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
76 |
| Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors: An alternative research design with policy implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
29 |
| Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
12 |
32 |
109 |
| Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
40 |
| Interactive overlays of journals and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of aggregated journal–journal citations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
23 |
| Interactive overlays: A new method for generating global journal maps from Web-of-Science data |
0 |
0 |
1 |
34 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
120 |
| Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals: Rao-Stirling diversity, relative variety, and the Gini coefficient |
0 |
1 |
7 |
19 |
3 |
13 |
55 |
167 |
| Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level: The changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
23 |
| International coauthorship relations in the Social Sciences Citation Index: Is internationalization leading the Network? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
37 |
| International collaboration clusters in Africa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
4 |
24 |
64 |
| International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
4 |
27 |
77 |
| Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization |
0 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
3 |
5 |
24 |
139 |
| Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations |
0 |
3 |
4 |
47 |
0 |
4 |
18 |
152 |
| Is the European Union Becoming a Single Publication System? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
8 |
| Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
31 |
| Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
34 |
| Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
39 |
| Journal maps, interactive overlays, and the measurement of interdisciplinarity on the basis of Scopus data (1996–2012) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
24 |
| Journal portfolio analysis for countries, cities, and organizations: Maps and comparisons |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
41 |
| Katy Börner: Atlas of science: visualizing what we know |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
73 |
| Knowledge emergence in scientific communication: from “fullerenes” to “nanotubes” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
12 |
| Knowledge linkage structures in communication studies using citation analysis among communication journals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
19 |
| Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
36 |
| Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
36 |
| Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
| Loet Leydesdorff wins the 2003 Derek John de Solla Price Medal |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
9 |
| Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
180 |
| Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
63 |
| Main‐path analysis and path‐dependent transitions in HistCite™‐based historiograms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
23 |
| Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
49 |
| Mapping (USPTO) patent data using overlays to Google Maps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
11 |
44 |
| Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
25 |
| Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
18 |
55 |
| Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
23 |
| Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of strengths and weaknesses |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
11 |
32 |
82 |
| Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal–journal citation relations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
16 |
| Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
41 |
| Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
15 |
| Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
22 |
| Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus “digital humanities” as a topic |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
39 |
| Matching Medline/PubMed data with Web of Science: A routine in R language |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
29 |
| Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
40 |
| Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory' |
0 |
0 |
0 |
68 |
1 |
5 |
14 |
248 |
| Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
83 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
290 |
| Measuring the knowledge-based economy of China in terms of synergy among technological, organizational, and geographic attributes of firms |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
22 |
| Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
35 |
| Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about 'Monarch butterflies,' 'Frankenfoods,' and 'stem cells' |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
19 |
| Measuring triple-helix synergy in the Russian innovation systems at regional, provincial, and national levels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
29 |
| Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: Steps toward a calculus of processing meaning |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
36 |
| Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
22 |
| National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University–industry–government versus international coauthorship relations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
19 |
| Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science |
1 |
2 |
4 |
152 |
1 |
16 |
37 |
838 |
| New features of CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
48 |
| On measuring complexity in a post-industrial economy: the ecosystem’s approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
59 |
| On the normalization and visualization of author co‐citation data: Salton's Cosine versus the Jaccard index |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
26 |
| Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
37 |
| Patent citation spectroscopy (PCS): Online retrieval of landmark patents based on an algorithmic approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
43 |
| Patent classifications as indicators of intellectual organization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
17 |
| Patent portfolio analysis of cities: statistics and maps of technological inventiveness |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
22 |
| Patents as instruments for exploring innovation dynamics: geographic and technological perspectives on “photovoltaic cells” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
44 |
| Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis |
0 |
1 |
5 |
31 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
165 |
| Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
22 |
| Percentile ranks and the integrated impact indicator (I3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
| Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators—a state-of-the-art report |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
65 |
| Publish or patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade-offs in national funding strategies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
28 |
| Publish or patent: Bibliometric evidence for empirical trade‐offs in national funding strategies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
| Re-thinking relations between texts and contexts in science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
18 |
| Redundancies in the communication of music: An operationalization of Schutz's ‘Making Music Together’ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
23 |
| Reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS) of Eugene Garfield’s publications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
69 |
| Referenced Publication Years Spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics, Journal of Informetrics, and a relevant subset of JASIST |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
27 |
61 |
| Regional Development in the Knowledge-Based Economy: The Construction of Advantage |
0 |
0 |
2 |
250 |
2 |
4 |
21 |
700 |
| Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
174 |
| Rejoinder to Van den Besselaar's letter entitled “Descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, rhetorical statistics” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
| Replicability and the public/private divide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
| Reply about using co‐words |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| Retraction of Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences lacks justification |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
23 |
| Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
111 |
| Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913-1997) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
222 |
| Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
58 |
| Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
96 |
| Science shops in Europe: the public as stakeholder |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
44 |
| Scopus' SNIP indicator: Reply to Moed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
29 |
| Scopus' SNIP indicator: Reply to Moed |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
14 |
| Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
18 |
| Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
67 |
| Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
18 |
| Should co‐occurrence data be normalized? A rejoinder |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
| Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
23 |
| Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
33 |
93 |
| Statistical significance and effect sizes of differences among research universities at the level of nations and worldwide based on the leiden rankings |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
| Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
16 |
| Statistical tests and research assessments: A comment on Schneider (2012) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
18 |
| Statistics for the dynamic analysis of scientometric data: the evolution of the sciences in terms of trajectories and regimes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
20 |
| Strategic intelligence on emerging technologies: Scientometric overlay mapping |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
28 |
| Synergy and policy-making in German innovation systems: Smart Specialisation Strategies at national, regional, local levels? |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
20 |
| Synergy in the knowledge base of U.S. innovation systems at national, state, and regional levels: The contributions of high‐tech manufacturing and knowledge‐intensive services |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
18 |
| Technological change and trade unions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
69 |
| Technology Transfer in European Regions: Introduction to the Special Issue |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
227 |
| Technology and Culture: the Dissemination and the Potential 'Lock-In' of New Technologies |
0 |
0 |
3 |
257 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
872 |
| Testing differences statistically with the Leiden ranking |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
| The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
25 |
74 |
| The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
21 |
| The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge-based economy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
45 |
| The Swedish system of innovation: Regional synergies in a knowledge‐based economy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
15 |
| The Synergy and Cycle Values in Regional Innovation Systems: The Case of Norway |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
66 |
| The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies |
0 |
0 |
4 |
45 |
1 |
7 |
38 |
204 |
| The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations |
2 |
6 |
12 |
25 |
5 |
25 |
87 |
196 |
| The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
57 |
| The Triple Helix of university‐industry‐government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
22 |
51 |
| The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy? |
0 |
0 |
3 |
49 |
1 |
6 |
42 |
337 |
| The citation field of evolutionary economics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
108 |
| The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese journals in mathematics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
16 |
| The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' “structuration theory” and Luhmann's “self-organization” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
19 |
54 |
| The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' “structuration theory” and Luhmann's “self‐organization” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
13 |
| The construction of interdisciplinarity: The development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977–2013 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
13 |
| The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh–Dole effect |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
38 |
| The delineation of an interdisciplinary specialty in terms of a journal set: The case of communication studies |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
23 |
| The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
21 |
| The dynamics of exchanges and references among scientific texts, and the autopoiesis of discursive knowledge |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
34 |
| The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations |
10 |
48 |
149 |
1,077 |
36 |
197 |
668 |
3,615 |
| The dynamics of triads in aggregated journal–journal citation relations: Specialty developments at the above-journal level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
36 |
| The emergence of China as a leading nation in science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
142 |
2 |
4 |
16 |
442 |
| The evaluation of national performance in selected priority areas using scientometric methods |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
91 |
| The integrated impact indicator revisited (I3*): a non-parametric alternative to the journal impact factor |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
53 |
| The measurement of “interdisciplinarity” and “synergy” in scientific and extra‐scientific collaborations |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
26 |
| The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
3 |
4 |
17 |
64 |
| The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
45 |
| The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
52 |
| The normalization of occurrence and Co-occurrence matrices in bibliometrics using Cosine similarities and Ochiai coefficients |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
65 |
| The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
53 |
| The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
37 |
| The scientometrics of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations (Introduction to the topical issue) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
18 |
| The self‐organization of the European Information Society: The case of “biotechnology” |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
| The semantic mapping of words and co-words in contexts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
16 |
43 |
| The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
| The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
18 |
| The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations |
0 |
0 |
2 |
127 |
0 |
2 |
23 |
390 |
| The university–industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
9 |
| The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits |
0 |
0 |
4 |
38 |
1 |
7 |
43 |
893 |
| The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
45 |
| The “academic trace” of the performance matrix: A mathematical synthesis of the h-index and the integrated impact indicator (I3) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
31 |
| Threaded Email Messages in Self-Organization and Science & Technology Studies Oriented Mailing Lists |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
12 |
| Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Reportof the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
15 |
| Topical connections between the institutions within an organisation (institutional co-authorships, direct citation links and co-citations) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
30 |
| Toward a calculus of redundancy: Signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
| Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings |
0 |
0 |
2 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
173 |
| Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue |
0 |
0 |
0 |
173 |
1 |
5 |
25 |
524 |
| Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
13 |
| Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
32 |
| University-Industry Collaboration in China and the USA: A Bibliometric Comparison |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
25 |
31 |
| Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
12 |
| Walk-round |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
15 |
| What Is the Effect of Synergy Provided by International Collaborations on Regional Economies? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
11 |
49 |
| Where is synergy indicated in the Norwegian innovation system? Triple-Helix relations among technology, organization, and geography |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
75 |
| Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
36 |
| Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
| Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
39 |
| Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
58 |
| Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
30 |
| Why words and co‐words cannot map the development of the sciences |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
11 |
| Within-journal self-citations and the Pinski-Narin influence weights |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
17 |
| hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
26 |
| “Interdisciplinarity” and “Synergy” in the Œuvre of Judit Bar-Ilan |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
12 |
| “Structuration” by intellectual organization: the configuration of knowledge in relations among structural components in networks of science |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
14 |
| “While a Storm is Raging on the Open Sea”: Regional Development in a Knowledge-based Economy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
129 |
| Total Journal Articles |
20 |
82 |
304 |
4,136 |
178 |
681 |
4,090 |
22,315 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.