| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| App Store Fees and App Business Models |
0 |
2 |
16 |
31 |
1 |
9 |
50 |
68 |
| Chocs de demande, effets d’apprentissage et exclusion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
16 |
| Chocs de demande, effets d’apprentissage et exclusion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
| Chocs de demande, effets d’apprentissage et exclusion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
22 |
| Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
16 |
| Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
126 |
0 |
9 |
12 |
424 |
| Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
47 |
| Choosing Intellectual Protection: Imitation, Patent Strength and Licensing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
14 |
| Collusion between two-sided platforms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
30 |
| Collusion between two-sided platforms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
106 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
120 |
| Cross-Licensing and Competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
62 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
73 |
| Cross-Licensing and Competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
325 |
0 |
3 |
21 |
110 |
| Cross-Licensing and Competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
112 |
| Cross-Licensing and competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
| Data Sharing or Analytics Sharing ? |
0 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
18 |
23 |
| Data Sharing or Analytics Sharing? |
0 |
0 |
4 |
18 |
1 |
9 |
18 |
34 |
| Data sharing or algorithm sharing? |
0 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
89 |
| Decentralizing Cooperation through Upstream Bilateral Agreements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
24 |
| Decentralizing Cooperation through Upstream Bilateral Agreements |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
37 |
| Decentralizing Cooperation through Upstream Bilateral Agreements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
| Demand Shocks, Learning-by-Doing and Exclusion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
83 |
| Do Standard-Essential Patent Owners Behave Opportunistically? Evidence from U.S. District Court Dockets |
0 |
0 |
2 |
25 |
1 |
3 |
12 |
68 |
| Do Standard-Essential Patent Owners Behave Opportunistically? Evidence from U.S. District Court Dockets |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
17 |
| Gatekeeping at the counter: The regulation of stacked payment platforms |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
14 |
| Gatekeeping at the counter: The regulation of stacked payment platforms |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
5 |
17 |
32 |
| Green Energy Pricing for Digital Europe |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
27 |
| Green energy pricing for digital europe |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
31 |
| Horizontal Mergers Between Multi-Sided Platforms: Insights from Cournot Competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
94 |
1 |
6 |
20 |
245 |
| Horizontal Mergers and Incremental Innovation |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
12 |
| Horizontal mergers and innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
29 |
| Horizontal mergers between multisided platforms: Insights from Cournot competition |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
19 |
| Invalid but infringed? An analysis of the bifurcated patent litigation system |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
1 |
6 |
8 |
97 |
| Leniency Programs for Multimarket Firms: The Effect of Amnesty Plus on Cartel Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
14 |
| Leniency Programs for Multimarket Firms: The Effect of Amnesty Plus on Cartel Formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
17 |
| Leniency Programs for Multimarket Firms: The Effect of Amnesty Plus on Cartel Formation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
123 |
1 |
6 |
13 |
581 |
| Leniency programs for multimarket firms: The effect of Amnesty Plus on cartel formation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
131 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
209 |
| Licensing 'weak' patents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
37 |
| Licensing weak patents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
19 |
| Market Structure and Investments: A Progress Report |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0 |
13 |
35 |
80 |
| Mergers and Demand-Enhancing Innovation |
0 |
3 |
9 |
29 |
1 |
8 |
30 |
100 |
| Mergers and Investments in New Products |
0 |
0 |
3 |
101 |
1 |
5 |
22 |
124 |
| Mergers and Investments: Where Do We Stand? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
13 |
| Mergers and Investments: Where Do We Stand? |
1 |
2 |
3 |
25 |
1 |
9 |
38 |
60 |
| Mergers and demand-enhancing innovation |
0 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
0 |
5 |
22 |
30 |
| Network Centrality and Device Ecosystems |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
14 |
17 |
| Network Centrality and Device Ecosystems |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
29 |
| Optimal Licensing of Uncertain Patents in the Shadow of Litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
61 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
124 |
| Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in the shadow of litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
56 |
| Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in the shadow of litigation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
3 |
11 |
64 |
| Patent Licensing Networks |
0 |
0 |
0 |
103 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
94 |
| Platform Liability and Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
2 |
19 |
36 |
| Platform Liability and Innovation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
40 |
0 |
4 |
22 |
101 |
| Platform Liability and Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
7 |
26 |
56 |
| Pooled Procurement of Drugs in Low and Middle Income Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
6 |
15 |
67 |
| Pooled Procurement of Drugs in Low and Middle Income Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
3 |
13 |
91 |
| Privacy Protection, Security, and Consumer Retention |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
20 |
| Privacy Protection, Security, and Consumer Retention |
0 |
0 |
3 |
46 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
146 |
| Privacy Protection, Security, and Consumer Retention |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
6 |
21 |
43 |
| Privacy Regulation and Quality Investment |
0 |
0 |
1 |
29 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
41 |
| Privacy Regulation and Quality-Enhancing Innovation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
4 |
16 |
35 |
| Privacy Regulation and Quality-Enhancing Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
5 |
11 |
23 |
| Privacy Regulation and Quality-Enhancing Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
1 |
3 |
18 |
146 |
| Privacy regulation and quality-enhancing innovation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
24 |
| The Economics of Platform Liability |
0 |
0 |
0 |
38 |
2 |
7 |
30 |
99 |
| The Economics of Platform Liability |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
7 |
15 |
30 |
| The Effect of Fee Shifting On Litigation: Evidence from a Policy Innovation in Intermediate Cost Shifting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
5 |
14 |
75 |
| The effect of fee shifting on litigation: evidence from a policy innovation in intermediate cost shifting |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
13 |
| Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Multi-Homing: Corrigendum and Comment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
6 |
17 |
84 |
| What to Buy When Forum Shopping? Analyzing Court Selection in Patent Litigation |
0 |
0 |
1 |
32 |
0 |
5 |
16 |
76 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
11 |
69 |
2,143 |
44 |
271 |
1,015 |
4,842 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.