| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A RELATIVE EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
147 |
| A RELATIVE EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
154 |
| ANALYZING AGRICULTURAL LANDOWNERS' WILLINGNESS TO INSTALL STREAMSIDE BUFFERS |
0 |
0 |
1 |
69 |
3 |
5 |
10 |
209 |
| Agricultural Land Use |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
30 |
| An Evaluation of Working Land and Open Space Preservation Programs in Maryland: Are They Paying Too Much? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
204 |
| Beyond Nutrition and Organic Labels—30 Years of Experience With Intervening in Food Labels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
27 |
| CAPITALIZATION OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS INTO FARMLAND PRICES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
57 |
| Competition-Based Environmental Policy: An Analysis of Farmland Preservation in Maryland |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
200 |
| DO AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION PROGRAMS AND PREFERENTIAL PROPERTY TAX PROGRAMS AFFECT FARMLAND CONVERSION? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
124 |
| DOES THE FARM SECTOR HAVE A CRITICAL MASS? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
157 |
| Do Agricultural Preservation Programs Affect Farmland Conversion? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
93 |
| Do Agricultural Preservation Programs Affect Farmland Conversion? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
321 |
| Do women and minorities earn less due to occupational segregation, lower wages, or fewer hours? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
| Do women and minorities earn less due to occupational segregation, lower wages, or fewer hours? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
12 |
| Does Targeting a Designated Area Crowd out the other Preservation Programs’ Efforts? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
90 |
| Economic Benefits of Farmland Preservation: Evidence from the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
154 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
1,723 |
| Economic Experiments for Policy Analysis and Program Design: A Guide for Agricultural Decisionmakers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
37 |
| Economic Experiments for Policy Analysis and Program Design: A Guide for Agricultural Decisionmakers |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
51 |
| Effects of a Free Trade Agreement on U.S. and Mexican Sanitary and Phytosanitary Regulations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
| FACTORS INFLUENCING PARTICIPATION IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
79 |
| FACTORS INFLUENCING PARTICIPATION IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
137 |
| GETTING THE MOST FOR OUR MONEY IN FARMLAND PRESERVATION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
56 |
| Gauging Support for Innovative Farmland Preservation Techniques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
133 |
| HEDONIC PRICE ANALYSIS OF EASEMENT PAYMENTS IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
195 |
| MIGRATION OF EXOTIC PESTS: PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS AND COOPERATIVE POLICIES TO PROTECT U.S. ECOSYSTEMS AND AGRICULTURAL INTERESTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
72 |
| Processing Costs for Canned Peaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
| Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
| Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
13 |
| THE ECONOMICS OF CONTROLLING INSECT-TRANSMITTED PLANT DISEASES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
178 |
| THE IMPACTS OF ALLOCATION STRATEGIES FOR SPATIALLY REGULATED CHEMICAL USE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
47 |
| The Effect of Farmland Preservation Programs on Farmland Prices |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
40 |
| WILLINGNESS OF FOREST LANDOWNERS TO USE POULTRY LITTER AS FERTILIZER |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
87 |
| Total Working Papers |
1 |
1 |
3 |
783 |
25 |
52 |
108 |
4,742 |