Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
A RELATIVE EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
139 |
A RELATIVE EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
150 |
ANALYZING AGRICULTURAL LANDOWNERS' WILLINGNESS TO INSTALL STREAMSIDE BUFFERS |
0 |
0 |
8 |
66 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
192 |
Agricultural Land Use |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
An Evaluation of Working Land and Open Space Preservation Programs in Maryland: Are They Paying Too Much? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
201 |
Beyond Nutrition and Organic Labels—30 Years of Experience With Intervening in Food Labels |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
20 |
CAPITALIZATION OF FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS INTO FARMLAND PRICES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
54 |
Competition-Based Environmental Policy: An Analysis of Farmland Preservation in Maryland |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
197 |
DO AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION PROGRAMS AND PREFERENTIAL PROPERTY TAX PROGRAMS AFFECT FARMLAND CONVERSION? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
122 |
DOES THE FARM SECTOR HAVE A CRITICAL MASS? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
150 |
Do Agricultural Preservation Programs Affect Farmland Conversion? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
92 |
Do Agricultural Preservation Programs Affect Farmland Conversion? Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator |
0 |
0 |
0 |
64 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
314 |
Do women and minorities earn less due to occupational segregation, lower wages, or fewer hours? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
Do women and minorities earn less due to occupational segregation, lower wages, or fewer hours? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
Does Targeting a Designated Area Crowd out the other Preservation Programs’ Efforts? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
Economic Benefits of Farmland Preservation: Evidence from the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
152 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1,711 |
Economic Experiments for Policy Analysis and Program Design: A Guide for Agricultural Decisionmakers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
28 |
Economic Experiments for Policy Analysis and Program Design: A Guide for Agricultural Decisionmakers |
0 |
0 |
1 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
42 |
Effects of a Free Trade Agreement on U.S. and Mexican Sanitary and Phytosanitary Regulations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
FACTORS INFLUENCING PARTICIPATION IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
FACTORS INFLUENCING PARTICIPATION IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
136 |
GETTING THE MOST FOR OUR MONEY IN FARMLAND PRESERVATION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
53 |
Gauging Support for Innovative Farmland Preservation Techniques |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
131 |
HEDONIC PRICE ANALYSIS OF EASEMENT PAYMENTS IN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
187 |
MIGRATION OF EXOTIC PESTS: PHYTOSANITARY REGULATIONS AND COOPERATIVE POLICIES TO PROTECT U.S. ECOSYSTEMS AND AGRICULTURAL INTERESTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
Processing Costs for Canned Peaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
THE ECONOMICS OF CONTROLLING INSECT-TRANSMITTED PLANT DISEASES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
166 |
THE IMPACTS OF ALLOCATION STRATEGIES FOR SPATIALLY REGULATED CHEMICAL USE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
The Effect of Farmland Preservation Programs on Farmland Prices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
28 |
WILLINGNESS OF FOREST LANDOWNERS TO USE POULTRY LITTER AS FERTILIZER |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
86 |
Total Working Papers |
0 |
0 |
10 |
771 |
2 |
6 |
41 |
4,573 |