| Working Paper |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Parametric Estimation of Total Factor Productivity and Its Components in U.S. Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
| A panel study of Iowa Farm Financial Conditions: 2014-2016 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Accounting for the Impact of Public Research, R&D Spill-ins, Extension and Roads in U.S. Regional Agricultural Productivity Growth, 1980–2004 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
50 |
| Additionality in cover-crop cost-share programs in Iowa: a matching assessment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
| An Economic Analysis of Cover Crop Utilization in Georgia Cotton and Peanut Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
| An Empirical Investigation of Productivity Spillovers along the Agricultural Supply Chain |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
| Annual Net Returns to Cover Crops in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Base acreage reallocation and payment yield update |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Benefits of Public R&D in U.S. Agriculture: Spill-Ins, Extension, and Roads |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
145 |
| Comprehensive Partial Budgets for Cover crops in Midwest Row Crop Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
63 |
| Cotton Market Integration across Countries, among Qualities, and through Time |
0 |
1 |
3 |
35 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
112 |
| Cotton Production Prospects in Selected Foreign Countries (PowerPoint) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
92 |
| Cover Crop Cost-Share Programs in Iowa: Do They Work? |
1 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
16 |
| Cover Crops Use in Midwestern U.S. Agriculture: Perceived Benefits and Net Returns |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
| Cover Crops and No-till in the I-States: Non-Permanence and Carbon Markets |
1 |
1 |
7 |
29 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
65 |
| Crop Insurance in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| Crop Insurance in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
33 |
| Crop insurance policies in 2014 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
| Current Crop Insurance Policies |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
46 |
| Declining Liquidity in Iowa Farms: 2014–2017 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| Decomposing U.S. agricultural productivity into weather shocks, technical change, scale effects, input price effects, and cost efficiency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
| Do Cover Crops Pay? Net Returns to Corn/Soybean Farmers in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Do cost-share programs increase cover crop use? Empirical evidence from Iowa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
13 |
| Does Fair Trade Deliver on Its Core Value Proposition? Effects on Income, Educational Attainment, and Health in Three Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
107 |
| Drivers of Profit Inefficiency in Iowa Crop Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Drivers of Profit Inefficiency in Iowa Crop Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
| Economic Effects of Gmos on Small Developing Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| Effects of restrictions on parameter estimates of US agricultural production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
| Farm Bill Payments in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Farmland leasing meetings will increase understanding of rental agreements |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
| Futures Market for Ag Carbon Offsets under Mandatory and Voluntary Emission Targets |
1 |
2 |
12 |
30 |
3 |
5 |
22 |
55 |
| How Weather Affects the Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity in U.S. Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
26 |
| Impact of local public goods on agricultural productivity growth in the U.S |
0 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
205 |
| Iowa Farmland Ownership and Tenure Survey 1982-2017: A Thirty-five Year Perspective |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
37 |
| Iowa farm custom rate survey shows slight increases for 2015 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| Is ARC-CO acting as a Safety Net Program? Evidence from Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Land Tenure and Conservation Practice Use: Evidence from Landowners’ Decisions in Iowa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
| Land rents decline but margins do not improve |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
| Land rents decline but margins do not improve |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| MARKET AND WELFARE EFFECTS OF MANDATORY COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN LABELING IN THE US SPECIALTY CROPS SECTOR |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
103 |
| Market Disintermediation and Producer Value Capture: The Case of Fair Trade Coffee in Nicaragua, Peru and Guatemala |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
75 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of GMO Introduction in Small Exporting Countries |
0 |
0 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
212 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of GMO Introduction in Small Open Economies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
50 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of Mandatory Country-Of-Origin Labeling in the Specialty Crops Sector |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling in the American Agri-food System |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling in the American Agri-food System |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
| Market and Welfare Effects of Mandatory Country-of-Origin Labeling in the US Specialty Crops Sector |
0 |
0 |
1 |
51 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
262 |
| Measuring U.S. Agriculture Productivity: Primal vs. Dual Approaches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
96 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
46 |
| New ARC-CO and PLC spreadsheets calculate projected payments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
| New ARC-CO and PLC spreadsheets calculate projected payments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| New Farm Bill, New Decisions, New Tools |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
| New Safety Net: PLC, ARC-CO, ARC-IC |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
| New and updated Iowa State University farm bill tools |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| PASS-THROUGH ANALYSIS OF COTTON PRICES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
332 |
| Partial Budgets for Cover Crops in Midwest Row Crop Farming |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
| Past and Future of Farm Bill Payments |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Price Expectations and Risk Profiles Drive Commodity Program Choices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Price Volatility in the World Cotton Market: Causes, Impacts, and Mitigation (PowerPoint) |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
47 |
| Rates of Return to Public Agricultural Research in 48 U.S. States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
| Rates of Return to Public Agricultural Research in 48 U.S. States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
94 |
| Rates of Returns to Public Agricultural Research in 48 U.S. States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
49 |
| Revenue Protection Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
| Revenue Protection Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
| Revenue Protection Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
52 |
| Revenue Protection Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
52 |
| Technical efficiency and adoption of conservation practices in Iowa soybean production |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
17 |
| The Effects of Public R&D on U.S. Agriculture: A State-Level Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
31 |
| The Farm Management Extension Audience of 2030 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| The Perceived Benefits, Challenges, and Environmental Effects of Cover Crop Implementation in South Carolina |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
16 |
| Theoretical Production Restrictions and Agricultural Technology in the United States |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
| US Agriculture as a Carbon Sink: From International Agreements to Farm Incentives |
0 |
0 |
48 |
48 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
| US Agriculture as a Carbon Sink: From International Agreements to Farm Incentives |
0 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
21 |
| What Drives Landowners' Conservation Decisions? Evidence from Iowa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
| What drives landowners’ conservation decisions? Evidence from Iowa |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
| What's in Store for Voluntary Agricultural Carbon Markets? |
0 |
0 |
7 |
20 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
38 |
| Total Working Papers |
3 |
5 |
97 |
943 |
8 |
23 |
129 |
3,117 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.