| Journal Article |
File Downloads |
Abstract Views |
| Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
Last month |
3 months |
12 months |
Total |
| A Budget Allocation Model for Large Hierarchical R&D Organizations |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
60 |
| A CRITIQUE OF THE CONSTANT ELASTICITY OF TRANSFORMATION (CET) LINEAR SUPPLY SYSTEM |
0 |
1 |
1 |
134 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
367 |
| A Fourier analysis of the US dairy industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
5 |
7 |
147 |
| A Long Road to Merger of Existing Programs at Washington State University |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
66 |
| A Nonparametric Investigation of Agricultural Production Behavior for U.S. Subregions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
19 |
| A POOLED TIME-SERIES CROSS-SECTION ANALYSIS OF LAND PRICES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
67 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
197 |
| ADAPTIVE PLANNING OVER THE CATTLE PRICE CYCLE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
55 |
| AJAE Appendix for: Induced Innovation In U.S. Agriculture: Time-series, Direct Econometric, and Nonparametric Tests |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
33 |
| ALLOCATABLE FIXED INPUTS AND JOINTNESS IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION: MORE IMPLICATIONS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
141 |
| ANALYSIS OF INNOVATIONS: DAIRY AND EXOTIC CROSSBREEDS FOR BEEF PRODUCTION |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
48 |
| Adaptive Planning Over the Cattle Price Cycle |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
| Agent Heterogeneity in Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion Technology: Integrating Economic, Diffusion, and Behavioral Innovation Theories |
0 |
0 |
0 |
27 |
4 |
7 |
7 |
102 |
| Aggregation of data and profit maximization in Mexican agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
128 |
| Aggregation without Separability: Tests of the United States and Mexican Agricultural Production Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
104 |
| Agricultural Product Supplies and Input Demands: Regional Comparisons |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
34 |
| Agricultural Production Technologies with Systematic and Stochastic Technical Change |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
38 |
| Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: Implications for Economic Modeling: Reply |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
| Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: More Implications |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
9 |
| Allocation of Scarce Resources to Agricultural Research: Review of Methodology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
15 |
| Analysis of Credit Access, U.S. Agricultural Productivity, and Residual Returns to Resources |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
12 |
27 |
| Analysis of Innovations: Dairy and Exotic Crossbreeds for Beef Production* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
| Assessing the comparative economics of a biotechnology: Artificial insemination dairy sires |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
61 |
| Asset fixity under state-contingent production uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
5 |
25 |
| Asymmetric Information and Profit Taking in Crop Insurance |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
48 |
| Benefits of Reducing Nutrient Variation in Fertilizer Mixes |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
48 |
| COW-CALF PRODUCERS' PERCEIVED PROFIT MAXIMIZATION OBJECTIVE: A LOGIT ANALYSIS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
36 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
240 |
| Choice of Functional Form for Agricultural Production Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
| Climate change, health care access and regional influence on components of U.S. agricultural productivity |
0 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
39 |
| Cost economies in the presence of marketing contracts |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
98 |
| Cow-Calf Producers' Perceived Profit Maximization Objective: A Logit Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
| Crop Insurance, Land Allocation, and the Environment |
0 |
0 |
1 |
65 |
3 |
5 |
12 |
193 |
| DERIVED DEMAND FOR IRRIGATION WATER: THE CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
193 |
| DETERMINING OPTIMAL REPLACEMENT AGE OF BEEF COWS IN THE PRESENCE OF STOCHASTIC ELEMENTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
51 |
| DISAGGREGATED ANALYSIS OF SHORT-RUN BEEF SUPPLY RESPONSE |
0 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
80 |
| DISCUSSION OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS AND THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
16 |
| Derived Demand for Irrigation Water: The California Aqueduct* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
9 |
| Determining Optimal Replacement Age of Beef Cows in the Presence of Stochastic Elements* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
| Determining market power exertion between buyers and sellers |
0 |
1 |
1 |
265 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
1,050 |
| Diffuse Decision-Making in Hierarchical Organizations: An Empirical Examination |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
43 |
| Disaggregated Output Supply and Pesticide Policy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Disaggregated estimates of output supply and input demand elasticities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
90 |
| Discussion of Agricultural Economics and the Changing Structure of Higher Education* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| Distinguishing the Source of Market Power |
0 |
0 |
1 |
107 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
424 |
| Do the Largest Firms Grow and Diversify the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
| Do the Largest Firms Grow and Diversify the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
110 |
| Does consistent aggregation really matter? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
54 |
| Dynamic Adjustment in US Agriculture under Climate Change |
0 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
1 |
4 |
10 |
83 |
| Dynamic Adjustment in the U.S. Dairy Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
| ECONOMICS OF SWINE CROSSBREEDING SYSTEMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
71 |
| Economics of Swine Crossbreeding Systems |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Enterprise diversification in US dairy: impact of risk preferences on scale and scope economies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
81 |
| Environmental Regulation and Innovation Offsets in the Bluegrass Seed Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
| Environmental Regulation and Innovation Offsets in the Bluegrass Seed Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
135 |
| Estimating the effectiveness of extension information systems using farm trials and subjective probabilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
82 |
| Estimating the effectiveness of extension information systems using farm trials and subjective probabilities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
| Estimation of Multicrop Production Functions: Comment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
| Evaluating alternative price expectation models for multiproduct supply analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
| Evaluating alternative price expectation models for multiproduct supply analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
81 |
| FUNCTIONAL FORM AND U.S. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ELASTICITIES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
111 |
| Farm Growth, Consolidation, and Diversification: Washington Dairy Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
73 |
| Farm Planning and Calf Marketing Strategies for Risk Management: An Application of Linear Programming and Statistical Decision Theory |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
| Geographic aggregation and induced innovation in American agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
29 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
118 |
| IMPACT OF RISK AVERSE BEHAVIOR ON FERTILIZER DEMAND FOR TAME FORAGES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
46 |
| INFORMATION AND HERD HEALTH MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN TEXAS DAIRIES |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
54 |
| INTEGRATION, RISK, AND SUPPLY RESPONSE: A SIMULATION AND LINEAR PROGRAMMING ANALYSIS OF AN EAST TEXAS COW-CALF PRODUCER |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
66 |
| ISSUES AND METHODS IN ESTIMATING ADJUSTMENT COSTS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
| Identifying Growth and Diversification Relationship in Washington Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
36 |
| Impact of Corn Prices on Slaughter Beef Composition and Prices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| Impact of Risk Averse Behavior on Fertilizer Demand for Tame Forages* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
| Impact of Target Prices and Payment Limits on the Supply Function |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| Impacts of terrain attributes on economics and the environment: costs of reducing potential nitrogen pollution in wheat production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
| Induced Innovation in U.S. Agriculture: Time-series, Direct Econometric, and Nonparametric Tests |
0 |
0 |
0 |
37 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
119 |
| Induced innovation and marginal cost of new technology |
0 |
0 |
1 |
31 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
111 |
| Information and Herd Health Management Practices in Texas Dairies |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
| Input Demands and Inefficiency in U.S. Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
3 |
6 |
9 |
55 |
| Integration, Risk, and Supply Response: A Simulation and Linear Programming Analysis of An East Texas Cow-Calf Producer |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
| Joint Estimation of Risk Preference Structure and Technology Using Expo-Power Utility |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
55 |
| Knowledge accumulation in US agriculture: research and learning by doing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
41 |
| Lifecycle economic analysis of biofuels: Accounting for economic substitution in policy assessment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
38 |
| Linear Programming versus Positively Estimated Supply Functions: An Empirical and Methodological Critique |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
| MANAGEMENT OF INTENSIVE FORAGE-BEEF PRODUCTION UNDER YIELD UNCERTAINTY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
93 |
| MULTIDIMENSIONAL EVALUATION OF FLEXIBLE FUNCTIONAL FORMS FOR PRODUCTION ANALYSIS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
72 |
| MULTIPLE-OUTPUT PRODUCTION MODELED WITH THREE FUNCTIONAL FORMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
5 |
9 |
10 |
122 |
| MULTIPRODUCT PRODUCTION CHOICES AND POLICY RESPONSE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
56 |
| Management of Intensive Forage-Beef Production Under Yield Uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
| Measuring the effectiveness of non-price export promotion using a supply-side approach |
0 |
0 |
0 |
142 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
746 |
| Mexican agricultural trade under the GATT |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
296 |
| Modeling Mexican agricultural production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
187 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
849 |
| Multidimensional Evaluation of Flexible Functional Forms for Production Analysis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
| Multiproduct Supply and Input Demand in U.S. Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
20 |
| NONROBUSTNESS OF DYNAMIC DUAL MODELS OF THE U.S. DAIRY INDUSTRY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
67 |
| Non-Neutral Marginal Innovation Costs, Omitted Variables, and Induced Innovation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
13 |
| Nonparametric Tests for Monopsonistic Market Power Exertion |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
16 |
| Off‐farm work and technical efficiency on U.S. dairies |
1 |
1 |
5 |
12 |
2 |
3 |
9 |
40 |
| Optimum Resource Allocation in U.S. Agriculture: Comment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
| Optimum Resource Allocation in U.S. Agriculture: Rejoinder |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
| PESTICIDE TAX, CROPPING PATTERNS, AND WATER QUALITY IN SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
146 |
| PRODUCTION INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN SRI LANKAN PEASANT AGRICULTURE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
124 |
| PRODUCTION INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN SRI LANKAN PEASANT AGRICULTURE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
| PRODUCTION RELATIONSHIPS IN SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
37 |
| PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY AND INPUT ALLOCATIONS IN SRI LANKAN MULTICROP FARMING |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
57 |
| PROFIT-MAXIMIZING DAIRY SIRE SELECTION PACKAGE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
113 |
| PROFITABILITY AND RISKS IN DAIRY FEEDING PROGRAMS: A MULTIPERIOD OPTIMIZATION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
30 |
| Pesticide Tax, Cropping Patterns, and Water Quality in South Central Texas |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
| Possible Implications of Voids in USDA Cattle Slaughter Data: Comment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
13 |
| Production Relationships in South Central Agriculture |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
| Production economics: Worthwhile investment? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
| Production economics: Worthwhile investment? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
| Productivity growth and convergence in US agriculture: new cointegration panel data results |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
2 |
6 |
8 |
136 |
| Profit Maximization, Returns to Scale, and Measurement Error |
0 |
0 |
1 |
61 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
412 |
| Profit maximization-does it matter? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
25 |
| Profit-Maximizing Dairy Sire Selection Package |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
| Profitability and Risks in Dairy Feeding Programs: A Multiperiod Optimization |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
| RECENT DUALITY CONTRIBUTIONS IN PRODUCTION ECONOMICS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
52 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
171 |
| RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE SOYBEAN CHECKOFF PROGRAMS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
39 |
| Refutable implications of the firm model under risk |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
94 |
| Research and Productivity in Mexican Agriculture |
0 |
1 |
1 |
21 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
87 |
| Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
| Returns to Soybean Producers from Investments in Promotion and Research |
0 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
85 |
| STRUCTURE OF SOUTH CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
174 |
| SUPPLY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE SOUTH - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
26 |
| SUPPLY RESPONSE AND IMPACT OF GOVERNMENT-SUPPORTED CROPS ON THE TEXAS VEGETABLE INDUSTRY |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
86 |
| SUPPLY RESPONSE OF TEXAS FIELD CROPS: AN EVALUATION OF THE CET LINEAR SUPPLY MODEL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
62 |
| Separability in State-Level Agricultural Technology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
| Simulating differences in net returns from beef production under alternative forage systems and management practices |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
31 |
| State-Level Output Supply and Input Demand Elasticities for Agricultural Commodities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
93 |
| Structure of South Central Agricultural Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
| Subjectivity in Ex Ante Research Evaluation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
| Supply Relationships in the South—What have we Learned? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
17 |
| Supply Response and Impact of Government-Supported Crops on the Texas Vegetable Industry |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
| Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
22 |
| TEXAS FIELD CROPS: ESTIMATION WITH CURVATURE |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
6 |
9 |
9 |
88 |
| Technical Change and Applications of Dynamic Duality to Agriculture: Reply |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
15 |
| Technical Change and Model Specification: U.S. Agricultural Production |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
38 |
| Testing Structure and Behavior with First- and Second-order Taylor Series Expansions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
35 |
| Testing aggregation consistency across geography and commodities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
50 |
| Testing aggregation consistency across geography and commodities |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
130 |
| Testing expected utility maximization under price and quantity risk with a heterogeneous panel |
0 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
93 |
| Testing for Behavioral Objective and Aggregation Opportunities in U.S. Agricultural Data |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
48 |
| The Economics and Econometrics of Damage Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
71 |
| The Economics of Dairy Anaerobic Digestion with Coproduct Marketing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
224 |
| The Economics of Dairy Anaerobic Digestion with Coproduct Marketing |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
32 |
| The Factor Share Approach to Production Function "Estimation": Actual or Estimated Equilibrium Shares? |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
18 |
| The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and U.S. Public Agricultural Research |
0 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
69 |
| The choice of functional form and estimation of banking inefficiency |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
116 |
| The role of federal Renewable Fuel Standards and market structure on the growth of the cellulosic biofuel sector |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
28 |
| To Tell the Truth about Interpreting the Morishima Elasticity of Substitution |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
35 |
| Trade Liberalization and Agricultural Chemical Use: United States and Mexico |
1 |
1 |
2 |
47 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
209 |
| U.S. AGGREGATE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION ELASTICITIES ESTIMATED BY AN ARIMA FACTOR SHARE ADJUSTMENT MODEL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
48 |
| U.S. Aggregate Agricultural Production Elasticities Estimated by an Arima Factor Share Adjustment Model |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
| U.S. Agricultural Productivity: A Review of USDA Economic Research Service Methods |
0 |
0 |
1 |
26 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
70 |
| Use of Scoring Models in Evaluating Research Programs |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
| Using the Quadratic Box-Cox for Flexible Functional Form Selection and Unconditional Variance Computation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
407 |
| VERIFICATION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING SOLUTIONS, WITH EMPHASIS ON SUPPLY IMPLICATIONS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
39 |
| Values, Changing Forces, Choices, and the Profession |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
10 |
| Verification of Linear Programming Solutions, with Emphasis on Supply Implications* |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| Washington biofuel feedstock crop supply under output price and quantity uncertainty |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
34 |
| Water access, farm productivity, and farm household income: Sri Lanka's Kirindi Oya irrigation system |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
50 |
| What Does Initial Farm Size Imply About Growth and Diversification? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
92 |
| What Does Initial Farm Size Imply About Growth and Diversification? |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
| Total Journal Articles |
2 |
12 |
29 |
2,612 |
177 |
362 |
576 |
12,943 |
LogEc is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.