Access Statistics for Ewa Zawojska

Author contact details at EconPapers.

Working Paper File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preference methods 0 0 0 22 4 7 13 106
An adverse social welfare effect of a doubly gainful trade 0 0 1 33 0 3 8 60
An adverse social welfare effect of a doubly gainful trade 0 0 0 9 2 8 18 53
Anomalies or Expected Behaviors? Understanding Stated Preferences and Welfare Implications in Light of Contemporary Behavioral Theory 1 3 16 117 2 11 37 197
Are preferences stated in web vs. personal interviews different? A comparison of willingness to pay results for a large multi-country study of the Baltic Sea eutrophication reduction 0 0 1 10 3 4 12 41
Benefit Transfer and Commodity Measurement Scales: Consequences for Validity and Reliability 0 0 0 18 3 3 8 85
Disentangling impacts of payment and provision consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences 0 0 0 20 0 3 7 37
Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences 0 0 0 49 2 3 14 139
Do numerical probabilities promote informed stated preference responses under inherent uncertainty? Insight from a coastal adaptation choice experiment 0 0 0 51 3 5 13 32
Does the number of discrete choice alternatives matter for respondents’ stated preferences? The case of tap water quality improvements 0 0 1 84 3 5 10 151
Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by the Wilanów Park: A benefit transfer study 0 0 0 36 0 0 5 89
From simple to complex: A revealed preference test of discrete choice experiment designs 0 2 7 7 10 20 44 44
Gender differentiation in risk-taking behavior: On the relative risk aversion of single men and single women 0 0 0 2 3 6 17 61
Gender differentiation in risk-taking behavior: On the relative risk aversion of single men and single women 0 0 0 36 0 4 17 102
How stable and predictable are welfare estimates using recreation demand models? 0 0 1 12 1 3 10 34
Incentivizing stated preference elicitation with choice-matching in the field 0 0 0 19 3 4 13 30
Information, consequentiality and credibility in stated preference surveys: A choice experiment on climate adaptation 0 0 0 13 1 12 20 32
Is there really a difference between “contingent valuation” and “choice experiments”? Evidence from an induced-value experiment 0 0 2 55 2 5 15 133
Measuring policy consequentiality perceptions in stated preference surveys 0 0 3 8 2 4 22 47
Mitigating strategic misrepresentation of values in open-ended stated preference surveys by using negative reinforcement 0 0 0 0 1 4 8 10
Moving beyond the contingent valuation versus choice experiment debate – Presentation effects in stated preference 2 3 5 223 5 14 34 624
On a way to overcome strategic overbidding in open-ended stated preference surveys: A recoding approach 0 0 0 50 1 4 9 79
On the inference about willingness to pay distribution using contingent valuation data 0 1 3 30 5 9 32 79
Payment and policy consequentiality in dichotomous choice contingent valuation: Experimental design effects on self-reported perceptions 0 1 5 52 1 8 16 130
Re-examining empirical evidence on contingent valuation – Importance of incentive compatibility 0 0 1 50 3 5 12 138
Reliability of international benefit transfer in cultural economics: Non-market valuation of theater in Denmark and Poland 0 0 2 16 1 3 12 40
Rewarding truthful-telling in stated preference studies 0 0 1 27 2 2 11 92
Time Pressure and Risk Taking in Auctions: A Field Experiment 0 0 0 34 1 4 9 108
Time Pressure and Risk Taking in Auctions: A Field Experiment 0 0 0 3 5 8 16 42
Toward a better understanding of elicitation effects in stated preference studies 0 0 0 62 1 1 14 128
Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems 0 0 0 28 4 5 18 94
Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving coastal and marine ecosystems 0 0 0 41 4 6 10 101
Valuing tap water quality improvements using stated preference methods. Does the number of discrete choice options matter? 0 0 0 19 2 3 11 49
Valuing theater performances through benefit transfer: Accuracy of transfers over space 0 0 24 24 6 13 43 43
Will a government find it financially easier to neutralize a looming protest if more groups are involved? 0 0 0 11 2 19 34 114
Will a government find it financially easier to neutralize a looming protest if more groups are involved? 0 0 0 6 0 1 3 89
Total Working Papers 3 10 73 1,277 88 219 595 3,433

Journal Article File Downloads Abstract Views
Last month 3 months 12 months Total Last month 3 months 12 months Total
A Consequential Contingent Valuation Referendum: Still Not Enough to Elicit True Preferences for Public Goods! 0 0 0 1 2 3 11 39
Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preferences methods 1 1 3 33 5 10 19 159
An adverse social welfare effect of a doubly gainful trade 0 0 0 4 0 3 14 77
Anomalies or Expected Behaviors? Understanding Stated Preferences and Welfare Implications in Light of Contemporary Behavioral Economics 0 0 2 2 2 3 16 18
Behavioral Drivers or Economic Incentives? Toward a Better Understanding of Elicitation Effects in Stated Preference Studies 0 1 2 36 2 9 24 117
Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: Progress, Prospects and Challenges 0 1 9 94 4 5 30 183
Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences 0 0 1 20 7 9 21 132
Effects of Varying the Location of Perceived Consequentiality Elicitation in a Discrete Choice Experiment Survey 0 1 5 7 0 4 14 17
Gender differentiation in risk-taking behavior: On the relative risk aversion of single men and single women 0 0 0 11 2 5 17 72
How much is our online privacy worth? A comparison of the value of personal data to internet users and online platforms in Poland 0 0 1 1 3 3 9 9
How stable and predictable are welfare estimates using recreation demand models? 0 1 1 1 0 4 18 18
Information, Consequentiality and Credibility in Stated Preference Surveys: A Choice Experiment on Climate Adaptation 0 0 1 6 2 3 18 43
Mitigating strategic misrepresentation of values in open-ended stated preference surveys by using negative reinforcement 0 0 0 5 3 5 19 66
Moving beyond the Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiment Debate: Presentation Effects in Stated Preference 0 0 4 15 5 9 22 83
On the inference about a willingness-to-pay distribution using contingent valuation data 1 1 2 2 8 13 28 35
Payment and Policy Consequentiality in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation: Experimental Design Effects on Self-Reported Perceptions 0 0 0 9 3 5 15 34
Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: importance of incentive compatibility 0 0 2 18 0 2 16 69
Relative Versus Absolute Commodity Measurements in Benefit Transfer: Consequences for Validity and Reliability 0 0 0 5 5 9 20 54
The role of dynamics for trust development. An experimental study 0 0 0 10 1 2 15 76
Time pressure and risk taking in auctions: A field experiment 0 0 0 8 3 4 14 62
Will a government find it financially easier to neutralize a looming protest if more groups are involved? 0 0 0 5 3 8 11 109
Total Journal Articles 2 6 33 293 60 118 371 1,472

logo

LogEc Home

Top Working Papers
Top Journal Articles
Top Books
Top Chapters
Top Software Items

Top Authors

Top Working Paper series and Journals

About LogEc

Authors with papers registered in the RePEc Author Service.

Register yourself as an author or register more papers in the RePEc Author Service.

Authors with no registered papers

RePEc
LogEc provides access and usage statistics for services based on the RePEc data set.

Örebro UniversityLogEc is hosted by the Örebro University School of Business.

Questions or comments? Please see our explanation of how the statistics are collected or e-mail

Since October 2025, abstract view statistics are potentially heavily influenced by traffic from AI bots and tools that we could not eliminate despite our best efforts.

Statistics updated 2026-05-06